Ulva fenestrata
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1515/bot-2023-0075 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11582444 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C39459-FFD2-FFBE-F420-FBB0FB0DFB31 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Ulva fenestrata |
status |
|
3.2 Small- and large-scale experiments with Ulva fenestrata treated with GeO 2
In the small-scale experiment, the RGR and all three photosynthetic parameters of Ulva fenestrata were statistically similar between the control (0 mg GeO 2 l −1) and the 3 GeO 2)
standard deviations. Lowercase letters above columns indicate
statistically significant differences between the treatments (P <0.001,
1-way ANOVA, Tukey-Kramer HSD post-hoc test).
20 photons 0.25 0.30
)
15
−
1
1
−
%
d
ETR
μmol0.20
(10
0.15
RGR 5 α electrons 0.05 0.10
0 μmol 0.00
0 0.022 0.223 2.235 (0 0.022 0.223 2.235 Figure 3: Physiological parameters of the small-scale cultivation of Ulva fenestrata with GeO 2.
40)
) 1
( A) Relative growth rates ( RGR),
1
− − s200
s
2 ( B) photosynthetic electron transport
−
2 −
m
30
m
efficiencies (α ETR), ( C) maximum electron
ETR
electrons max
20 photons 150
100 transport
saturation rates
after
points (
small-scale
ETR of max photosynthesis) and
cultivation
(D) light ( E k
(
)
5
of
days
) 10
μmol μmol
(
E
(
k 50 in tions 1-l glass at 140 beakers µmol photons with four m −2 GeO s −1 2 and concentra- 9 ° C.
0 0
Data are means of three replicates per treat-
0 0.022 0.223 2.235 0 0.022 0.223 2.235
ment (n = 3) and error bars represent standard
GeO 2 concentration (mg L− 1) GeO 2 concentration (mg L− 1) deviations.
concentrations tested between 0.022 and 2.235 mg l −1 (Figure 3). In addition, the contents of Chl a and Chl b in U. fenestrata remained unaffected by the presence of different GeO 2 concentrations in the seawater ( Table 1 View Table 1 ). However, there was slight decrease in the Chl a / b ratio of U. fenestrata from 1.61 ± 0.08 in the control by 10 – 15 % in the presence of GeO 2 ( P = 0.0208, 1-way ANOVA; Table 1 View Table 1 ).
In the large-scale experiment, the RGR, all three photosynthetic parameters, and the chlorophyll contents, including the Chl a / b ratio of U. fenestrata , were statistically similar between the control and the two tested GeO 2 concentrations after 14 days of cultivation (Figure 4 and Table 1 View Table 1 ). However, the addition of GeO 2 to the seawater decreased the density of F. oceanica on the wall surfaces of the Plexiglass water tanks by 36 – 43 % at 0.223 – 2.235 mg GeO 2 l −1 compared to the control ( P = 0.0077, 1-way ANOVA; Figure 5 View Figure 5 ).
A |
Harvard University - Arnold Arboretum |
B |
Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin-Dahlem, Zentraleinrichtung der Freien Universitaet |
C |
University of Copenhagen |
E |
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh |
P |
Museum National d' Histoire Naturelle, Paris (MNHN) - Vascular Plants |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |