Enaphalodes archboldi, Lingafelter and Chemsak, 2002
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.3713489 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DA65E553-0721-48FA-A774-85F8ABDBB5FD |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3717350 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A2D601-7008-EC26-0282-FEBBFE61CCEA |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Enaphalodes archboldi |
status |
|
Enaphalodes archboldi View in CoL .
Observations on the life history of E. archboldi were made in March 2018 in Marion County, Florida. Larval workings were initially noticed as cut-off stems of scrub oaks felled on the ground. The size of the larvae and the unique larval workings suggested that it may belong either to Romulus globosus Knull or E. archboldi . Rearing revealed that it was the latter species.
E. archboldi develops in living stems (typically 2-5 cm in diameter) of scrub oaks (habitat and cut oak in Fig. 1-2 View Figures 1–2 ) and pupates in the roots. Larvae were found in Quercus myrtifolia Willd. , Quercus inopina Ashe , and Quercus geminata Small. Oviposition occurs in lower portions of the stem, about 50 cm or so above ground, although the height is quite variable. This statement is based on tracking larval galleries to their beginning. The young larva works its way down, usually circling the stem initially ( Fig. 3 View Figures 3–4 ) and then continues boring straight down just beneath the bark ( Fig. 4 View Figures 3–4 ). This relatively small and gradually widening subcortical gallery causes various perturbations in the bark such as cracks and swellings ( Fig. 3 View Figures 3–4 ). Sometimes the portion of the stem with the gallery inside becomes recessed as the surrounding living tissue grows and gains in circumference ( Fig. 5 View Figures 5–6 ). Slightly above the ground the larva completely severs the stem. Judging by the significant amount of expelled granular frass, it probably spends considerable time in this area ( Fig. 6-8 View Figures 5–6 View Figures 7–8 ). Below this girdle, the larva constructs a short tunnel (10-20 cm long) into the roots. The tunnel is kept empty ( Fig. 9 View Figures 9–10 ) and it is later used for pupation. Girdled stems break off and can be readily seen in the vegetation ( Fig. 2 View Figures 1–2 , 7 View Figures 7–8 ). Both girdled ends are covered with tightly packed granular frass left by larval activity ( Fig. 8 View Figures 7–8 ). Prior to pupation the larva seals the tunnel with a fibrous plug. Adult beetles emerge through this tunnel after removing larval frass. Empty emergence holes from previous years can be seen in the field ( Fig. 10 View Figures 9–10 ).
Overall, larval habits of E. archboldi are similar to several other elaphidiine beetles, for instance, Neaneflus fuchsii (Wickham) or Aneflomorpha subpubescens (LeConte) . In all these species, the larvae start feeding in living stems, then girdle the stem at the ground level and travel down into the roots where they pupate ( Heffern et al. 2018).
In early March, large larvae that appeared mature were found in the tunnel. Typically, only one larva was found per stem, although two thicker stems contained two larvae each. The larvae were placed into rearing vials as described previously ( Vlasak 2014). Several roots were also removed and placed into rearing containers. Transformation started many months later. The first pupa appeared in the second week of June and most larvae transformed into pupae in early to mid-July. The first adult transformed in the first week of July, followed by most adults in mid to late July and early August. The first adult emerged from the roots in the last week of July, the rest in early to mid-August. Only about 50% of larvae transformed into adult beetles. The rest slowly declined, shrank and, although still alive, were eventually discarded. A similar situation was observed in the roots; in mid-August the remaining roots were opened and, with the exception of one teneral adult, they contained shrunken larvae that did not appear to be in good health. The reason for their decline is unclear.
Although adult beetles are apparently rare, larval workings were seen frequently in the beetle’s habitat. Approximately twenty larvae were found along a stretch of a forest trail about 0.5 miles long; most workings were visible directly from the trail. About half as many stems where the beetle emerged in previous years were also encountered. Similar frequency was observed inside the scrub-oak vegetation but the beetle seemed to be more common (or at least was easier found) in open, sandy areas where one could walk relatively freely among oak shrubs ( Fig. 1 View Figures 1–2 ).
It has been reported that most specimens in collections (41 out of 46) are females ( Lingafelter and Chemsak 2002). In this study, 12 females and 16 males were reared, suggesting that the apparent sex bias is likely a result of the collection method (specimens were collected at lights) and not a true bias in the population.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |