Chrysis pubescens Smith, 1852
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4929.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1290857D-36E6-47DE-81C7-70CBD7C0AE01 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4544820 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A96A8877-B404-FF95-64CD-F560FB0D8D13 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Chrysis pubescens Smith, 1852 |
status |
|
( Figs 54 View FIGURE 54 A–54F)
Chrysis pubescens Smith, 1852: 45 . Holotype [sex unknown]; India: Maharashtra: Bombay [= Mumbai] (NHMUK). Dalla Torre 1892: 86 (cat., India); Kimsey & Bohart 1991: 452 (cat., India, comparata-scutellaris group).
Chrysis (Tetrachrysis) pubescens: Mocsáry 1889: 376 (descr., India Orientalis: Bombay); Bischoff 1913: 57 (cat., India).
Material examined. 1 ♂, Bihar, Dacca [= Dhaka], v.1938 ( MNLU) ; 1 ♀, Karaikal, Nadungadu [= Nedungadu], 10.iv.1933 ( MNLU) ; 1 ♀, Maharashtra, Bombay Presidency ( Mumbai) 1910, leg. E. Comber ( MNLU) ; 1 ♀, Tamil Nadu, Madras [= Chennai], Chetpat-Polur , 15.iv.1931, leg. P.S. Nathan ( MNLU) ; 2 ♀, Tamil Nadu, Settipatti , 30.ix–10.x.1975, leg. W. Perraudin ( MNLU) ; 1 ♀, idem, xi.1979 ( MNLU) ; 2 ♀, Tamil Nadu, Omalur, Settipatti , 27.xii.1975, leg. W. Perraudin ( MNLU) ; 1 ♀, idem, 6.i.1976 ( MNLU) ; 1 ♀, idem, 26.iii.1976 ( MNLU) ; 1 ♂, idem, 30.iii.1976 ( MNLU) ; 1 ♀, Tamil Nadu, Omalur, Salem , iii.1978, leg. W. Perraudin ( MNLU) .
Distribution. India (Bihar; Maharashtra; Tamil Nadu); Sri Lanka ( Kimsey & Bohart 1991).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Chrysidinae |
Tribe |
Chrysidini |
Genus |
Chrysis pubescens Smith, 1852
Rosa, Paolo, Aswathi, Pokkattu Gopi & Bijoy, Chenthamarakshan 2021 |
Chrysis (Tetrachrysis) pubescens: Mocsáry 1889: 376
Bischoff, H. 1913: 57 |
Mocsary, A. 1889: 376 |
Chrysis pubescens
Kimsey, L. S. & Bohart, R. M. 1991: 452 |
Dalla Torre, C. G. de 1892: 86 |
Smith, F. 1852: 45 |