Phrynidius, Lacordaire, 1869
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5323.4.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DAAF3E31-A245-4421-A41B-E9BE1538ABF9 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8221916 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FE18879D-9B1E-831C-FF2B-FC1AFA4DFDF5 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2023-08-03 16:09:28, last updated 2024-11-28 07:21:31) |
scientific name |
Phrynidius |
status |
|
Key to species of Phrynidius View in CoL
1. Elytra with distinct, short, erect spatulate setae (e.g. Fig. 12 View FIGURES 10–13 )................................................. 2
- Elytra without erect spatulate setae (e.g. Fig. 48 View FIGURES 46–51 ), or with erect setae almost absent (e.g. Fig. 24 View FIGURES 22–28 ).................... 6
2(1). Antennal tubercles contiguous basally (e.g. Fig. 14 View FIGURES 14–17 )........................................................ 3
- Antennal tubercles not contiguous basally (e.g. Fig. 22 View FIGURES 22–28 )..................................................... 5
3(2). Erect setae on elytra present only apically. Guatemala................................... P. guatemalensis sp. nov.
- Erect setae on elytra abundant throughout................................................................ 4
4(3). Antennomere III 0.6 times longer than IV; sides of prothorax distinctly rounded ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 10–13 ). Honduras.. P. poriferus sp. nov.
- Antennomere III twice length of IV; sides of prothorax slightly rounded ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 14–17 ). Guatemala........ P. skillmani sp. nov.
5(2). Antennomere IV about as long as V and VI together ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 18–21 ). Honduras......................... P. obrieni sp. nov.
- Antennomere IV distinctly longer than V and VI together ( Figs 22, 27 View FIGURES 22–28 ). Mexico (Veracruz)........... P. wibmeri sp. nov.
6(1). Antennomere III at most as long as scape................................................................ 7
- Antennomere III longer than scape.................................................................... 14
7(6). Pronotum with distinct elevated anterocentral gibbosity (e.g. Fig. 33 View FIGURES 29–35 ).......................................... 8
- Pronotum without anterocentral gibbosity or anterocentral gibbosity almost indistinct (e.g. Fig. 55 View FIGURES 52–56. 52–54 ).................. 9
8(7). Body stout ( Figs 29, 34 View FIGURES 29–35 ); anterocentral gibbosity on the pronotum uniformly convex dorsally, not sinuous laterally ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 29–35 ). Mexico (Oaxaca, Hidalgo)......................................................... P. pallifemoralis sp. nov.
- Body slender ( Figs 36, 40 View FIGURES 36–41 ); anterocentral gibbosity on the pronotum irregular dorsally, sinuous laterally ( Fig. 38 View FIGURES 36–41 ). Mexico (Oaxaca)....................................................................... P. oaxacanensis sp. nov.
9(7). Scape longer than pedicel and antennomere III together.................................................... 10
- Scape shorter or as long as pedicel and antennomere III together............................................. 11
10(9). Elytra elongate, pubescent. Mexico (Hidalgo; Veracruz, see also Volcán de Orizaba (Veracruz and/or Puebla — Selander & Vaurie 1962).................................................................... P. inaequalis ( Say, 1835)
- Elytra ovoid, subglabrous. Mexico (Chiapas)....................... P. diminutus Gutiérrez, Toledo & Noguera, 2020 View in CoL
11(9). Antennomere IV as long as V–VI together. Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua..................... P. asper Bates, 1885 View in CoL
- Antennomere IV shorter than V–VI together............................................................. 12
12(11). Scutellum more than twice as wide as long. Mexico, Guatemala........................... P. armatus Linsley, 1933 View in CoL
- Scutellum very small, almost as wide as long............................................................ 13
13(12). Antennal tubercles very close to each other basally, with the area between them V-shaped; prothorax longer than wide. El Salvador......................................................... P. salvadorensis salvadorensis Franz, 1954 View in CoL
- Antennal tubercles not very close to each other basally, with the area between them U-shaped; prothorax as wide as long. El Salvador, Honduras.............................................. P. salvadorensis montecristensis Franz, 1954 View in CoL
14(6). Elytra with large tubercle laterally after middle, with its base wider than apical width of metafemora. Mexico (Chiapas)............................................................ P. tuberculatus Gutiérrez, Toledo & Noguera, 2020 View in CoL
- None of the elytral tubercles as wide at the base as the apex of the metafemora................................. 15
15(14). Apex of elytral tubercles glabrous..................................................................... 16
- Apex of elytral tubercles pubescent.................................................................... 17
16(15). Central tubercle of pronotum distinctly conical. Mexico (Chiapas)......... P. jonesi Gutiérrez, Toledo & Noguera, 2020 View in CoL
- Central tubercle of pronotum uniformly convex. Guatemala, Honduras. P. guifarroi Santos-Silva, Van Roie & Jocqué, 2021 View in CoL
17(15). Antennal tubercles contiguous basally, with the area between them V-shaped................................... 18
- Antennal tubercles not contiguous basally, with the area between them U-shaped................................ 19
18(17). Antennomere III as long as scape. Mexico (Chiapas).................. P. cristinae Gutiérrez, Toledo & Noguera, 2020 View in CoL
- Antennomere III longer than scape. Guatemala...................................... P. echinoides Breuning, 1940 View in CoL
19(17). Pronotum without strongly elevated central tubercle. Guatemala, Honduras, Costa Rica, Panama... P. echinus Bates, 1880 View in CoL
- Pronotum with strongly elevated central tubercle with convex apex........................................... 20
20(19). Width of lower eye lobes equal to basal width of scape. Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras......... P. singularis Bates, 1880 View in CoL
- Width of lower eye lobes greater than basal width of scape. Mexico (Nayarit), Honduras............................................................................... P. nayaritensis Heffern, Nascimento & Santos-Silva, 2018 View in CoL
Bates, H. W. (1880) Longicornia, Fam. Cerambycidae [continuation]. In: Godman, F. D., Salvin, O. (Eds.), Biologia Centrali-Americana, Insecta, Coleoptera. Vol. 5. Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 17 - 152.
Bates, H. W. (1885) Supplement to Longicornia. In: Godman, F. D., Salvin, O. (Eds.), Biologia Centrali-Americana, Insecta, Coleoptera. Vol. 5. Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 249 - 436.
Heffern, D., Nascimento, F. E. L. & Santos-Silva, A. (2018) Descriptions, redescription, notes, and new ranks in American Cerambycidae (Coleoptera). Zootaxa, 4531 (1), 59 - 80. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4531.1.2
Linsley, E. G. (1933) A new longicorn beetle from Central America. The Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 9 (3), 131 - 132.
Santos-Silva, A., Van Roie, M. & Jocque, M. (2021) Longhorned woodboring beetles (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) from Cusuco National Park, Honduras: new species, new records, and revalidation. European Journal of Taxonomy, 764, 37 - 61. https: // doi. org / 10.5852 / ejt. 2021.764.1469
Say, T. (1835) Descriptions of New North American coleopterous insects, and observations on some already described. Boston Journal of Natural History, 1 (2), 151 - 203.
Selander, B. S. & Vaurie, P. (1962) A gazetteer to accompany the Insecta volumes of the Biologia Centrali-Americana. American Museum Novitates, 2099, 1 - 70.
FIGURES 10–13. Phrynidius poriferus sp. nov., holotype female: 10) Dorsal habitus; 11) Ventral habitus; 12) Lateral habitus; 13) Head, frontal view.
FIGURES 46–51. Phrynidius echinus Bates, 1880. 46–49) Male: 46) Dorsal habitus; 47) Ventral habitus; 48) Lateral habitus; 49) Head, frontal view. 50–51) Female: 50) Dorsal habitus; 51) Ventral habitus.
FIGURES 22–28. Phrynidius wibmeri sp. nov. 22–25) Holotype male: 22) Dorsal habitus; 23) Ventral habitus; 24) Lateral habitus; 25) Head, frontal view. 26) Paratype male, dorsal habitus. 27–28) Paratype female: 27) Dorsal habitus; 28) Ventral habitus.
FIGURES 14–17. Phrynidius skillmani sp. nov., holotype female: 14) Dorsal habitus; 15) Ventral habitus; 16) Lateral habitus; 17) Head, frontal view.
FIGURES 18–21. Phrynidius obrieni sp. nov., holotype female: 18) Dorsal habitus; 19) Ventral habitus; 20) Lateral habitus; 21) Head, frontal view.
FIGURES 29–35. Phrynidius pallifemoralis sp. nov. 29–33) Holotype male: 29) Dorsal habitus; 30) Ventral habitus; 31) Lateral habitus; 32) Head, frontal view; 33) Prothorax, oblique view. 34–35) Female paratype: 34) Dorsal habitus; 35) Ventral habitus.
FIGURES 52–56. 52–54) Phrynidius echinus Bates, 1880, holotype: 52) Dorsal habitus; 53) Lateral habitus; 54) Labels. 55–56) Phrynidius armatus Linsley, 1933, holotype male: 55) Dorsal habitus; 56) Lateral habitus. Figures 52–54 by Keita Matsumoto (BMNH); 55–56 by Ranchel Diaz-Bastin (CASC).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |