Phrynidius, Lacordaire, 1869
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5323.4.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DAAF3E31-A245-4421-A41B-E9BE1538ABF9 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FE18879D-9B1E-831C-FF2B-FC1AFA4DFDF5 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2023-08-03 16:09:28, last updated by Juliana 2023-08-07 17:52:01) |
|
scientific name |
Phrynidius |
| status |
|
Key to species of Phrynidius View in CoL
1. Elytra with distinct, short, erect spatulate setae (e.g. Fig. 12 View FIGURES 10–13 )................................................. 2
- Elytra without erect spatulate setae (e.g. Fig. 48 View FIGURES 46–51 ), or with erect setae almost absent (e.g. Fig. 24 View FIGURES 22–28 ).................... 6
2(1). Antennal tubercles contiguous basally (e.g. Fig. 14 View FIGURES 14–17 )........................................................ 3
- Antennal tubercles not contiguous basally (e.g. Fig. 22 View FIGURES 22–28 )..................................................... 5
3(2). Erect setae on elytra present only apically. Guatemala................................... P. guatemalensis sp. nov.
- Erect setae on elytra abundant throughout................................................................ 4
4(3). Antennomere III 0.6 times longer than IV; sides of prothorax distinctly rounded ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 10–13 ). Honduras.. P. poriferus sp. nov.
- Antennomere III twice length of IV; sides of prothorax slightly rounded ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 14–17 ). Guatemala........ P. skillmani sp. nov.
5(2). Antennomere IV about as long as V and VI together ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 18–21 ). Honduras......................... P. obrieni sp. nov.
- Antennomere IV distinctly longer than V and VI together ( Figs 22, 27 View FIGURES 22–28 ). Mexico (Veracruz)........... P. wibmeri sp. nov.
6(1). Antennomere III at most as long as scape................................................................ 7
- Antennomere III longer than scape.................................................................... 14
7(6). Pronotum with distinct elevated anterocentral gibbosity (e.g. Fig. 33 View FIGURES 29–35 ).......................................... 8
- Pronotum without anterocentral gibbosity or anterocentral gibbosity almost indistinct (e.g. Fig. 55 View FIGURES 52–56. 52–54 ).................. 9
8(7). Body stout ( Figs 29, 34 View FIGURES 29–35 ); anterocentral gibbosity on the pronotum uniformly convex dorsally, not sinuous laterally ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 29–35 ). Mexico (Oaxaca, Hidalgo)......................................................... P. pallifemoralis sp. nov.
- Body slender ( Figs 36, 40 View FIGURES 36–41 ); anterocentral gibbosity on the pronotum irregular dorsally, sinuous laterally ( Fig. 38 View FIGURES 36–41 ). Mexico (Oaxaca)....................................................................... P. oaxacanensis sp. nov.
9(7). Scape longer than pedicel and antennomere III together.................................................... 10
- Scape shorter or as long as pedicel and antennomere III together............................................. 11
10(9). Elytra elongate, pubescent. Mexico (Hidalgo; Veracruz, see also Volcán de Orizaba (Veracruz and/or Puebla — Selander & Vaurie 1962).................................................................... P. inaequalis ( Say, 1835)
- Elytra ovoid, subglabrous. Mexico (Chiapas)....................... P. diminutus Gutiérrez, Toledo & Noguera, 2020
11(9). Antennomere IV as long as V–VI together. Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua..................... P. asper Bates, 1885
- Antennomere IV shorter than V–VI together............................................................. 12
12(11). Scutellum more than twice as wide as long. Mexico, Guatemala........................... P. armatus Linsley, 1933
- Scutellum very small, almost as wide as long............................................................ 13
13(12). Antennal tubercles very close to each other basally, with the area between them V-shaped; prothorax longer than wide. El Salvador......................................................... P. salvadorensis salvadorensis Franz, 1954
- Antennal tubercles not very close to each other basally, with the area between them U-shaped; prothorax as wide as long. El Salvador, Honduras.............................................. P. salvadorensis montecristensis Franz, 1954
14(6). Elytra with large tubercle laterally after middle, with its base wider than apical width of metafemora. Mexico (Chiapas)............................................................ P. tuberculatus Gutiérrez, Toledo & Noguera, 2020
- None of the elytral tubercles as wide at the base as the apex of the metafemora................................. 15
15(14). Apex of elytral tubercles glabrous..................................................................... 16
- Apex of elytral tubercles pubescent.................................................................... 17
16(15). Central tubercle of pronotum distinctly conical. Mexico (Chiapas)......... P. jonesi Gutiérrez, Toledo & Noguera, 2020
- Central tubercle of pronotum uniformly convex. Guatemala, Honduras. P. guifarroi Santos-Silva, Van Roie & Jocqué, 2021
17(15). Antennal tubercles contiguous basally, with the area between them V-shaped................................... 18
- Antennal tubercles not contiguous basally, with the area between them U-shaped................................ 19
18(17). Antennomere III as long as scape. Mexico (Chiapas).................. P. cristinae Gutiérrez, Toledo & Noguera, 2020
- Antennomere III longer than scape. Guatemala...................................... P. echinoides Breuning, 1940
19(17). Pronotum without strongly elevated central tubercle. Guatemala, Honduras, Costa Rica, Panama... P. echinus Bates, 1880
- Pronotum with strongly elevated central tubercle with convex apex........................................... 20
20(19). Width of lower eye lobes equal to basal width of scape. Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras......... P. singularis Bates, 1880
- Width of lower eye lobes greater than basal width of scape. Mexico (Nayarit), Honduras............................................................................... P. nayaritensis Heffern, Nascimento & Santos-Silva, 2018
Bates, H. W. (1880) Longicornia, Fam. Cerambycidae [continuation]. In: Godman, F. D., Salvin, O. (Eds.), Biologia Centrali-Americana, Insecta, Coleoptera. Vol. 5. Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 17 - 152.
Bates, H. W. (1885) Supplement to Longicornia. In: Godman, F. D., Salvin, O. (Eds.), Biologia Centrali-Americana, Insecta, Coleoptera. Vol. 5. Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 249 - 436.
Heffern, D., Nascimento, F. E. L. & Santos-Silva, A. (2018) Descriptions, redescription, notes, and new ranks in American Cerambycidae (Coleoptera). Zootaxa, 4531 (1), 59 - 80. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4531.1.2
Linsley, E. G. (1933) A new longicorn beetle from Central America. The Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 9 (3), 131 - 132.
Santos-Silva, A., Van Roie, M. & Jocque, M. (2021) Longhorned woodboring beetles (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) from Cusuco National Park, Honduras: new species, new records, and revalidation. European Journal of Taxonomy, 764, 37 - 61. https: // doi. org / 10.5852 / ejt. 2021.764.1469
Say, T. (1835) Descriptions of New North American coleopterous insects, and observations on some already described. Boston Journal of Natural History, 1 (2), 151 - 203.
Selander, B. S. & Vaurie, P. (1962) A gazetteer to accompany the Insecta volumes of the Biologia Centrali-Americana. American Museum Novitates, 2099, 1 - 70.
FIGURES 10–13. Phrynidius poriferus sp. nov., holotype female: 10) Dorsal habitus; 11) Ventral habitus; 12) Lateral habitus; 13) Head, frontal view.
FIGURES 46–51. Phrynidius echinus Bates, 1880. 46–49) Male: 46) Dorsal habitus; 47) Ventral habitus; 48) Lateral habitus; 49) Head, frontal view. 50–51) Female: 50) Dorsal habitus; 51) Ventral habitus.
FIGURES 22–28. Phrynidius wibmeri sp. nov. 22–25) Holotype male: 22) Dorsal habitus; 23) Ventral habitus; 24) Lateral habitus; 25) Head, frontal view. 26) Paratype male, dorsal habitus. 27–28) Paratype female: 27) Dorsal habitus; 28) Ventral habitus.
FIGURES 14–17. Phrynidius skillmani sp. nov., holotype female: 14) Dorsal habitus; 15) Ventral habitus; 16) Lateral habitus; 17) Head, frontal view.
FIGURES 18–21. Phrynidius obrieni sp. nov., holotype female: 18) Dorsal habitus; 19) Ventral habitus; 20) Lateral habitus; 21) Head, frontal view.
FIGURES 29–35. Phrynidius pallifemoralis sp. nov. 29–33) Holotype male: 29) Dorsal habitus; 30) Ventral habitus; 31) Lateral habitus; 32) Head, frontal view; 33) Prothorax, oblique view. 34–35) Female paratype: 34) Dorsal habitus; 35) Ventral habitus.
FIGURES 52–56. 52–54) Phrynidius echinus Bates, 1880, holotype: 52) Dorsal habitus; 53) Lateral habitus; 54) Labels. 55–56) Phrynidius armatus Linsley, 1933, holotype male: 55) Dorsal habitus; 56) Lateral habitus. Figures 52–54 by Keita Matsumoto (BMNH); 55–56 by Ranchel Diaz-Bastin (CASC).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |