Xantholinus (Helicophallus) multispinosus, Assing, Volker, 2007

Assing, Volker, 2007, On the Xantholinini of Turkey and adjacent regions (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Staphylininae), Zootaxa 1474, pp. 1-54 : 33-35

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.176738

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1C57150F-8D4C-4B22-AF4B-8F1FBF614930

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6244466

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0D308E1E-FFA8-FF90-FF39-FDB5FC91FE6F

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Xantholinus (Helicophallus) multispinosus
status

sp. nov.

Xantholinus (Helicophallus) multispinosus View in CoL sp. n.

( Figs. 63–74 View FIGURES 63 – 74 , 84 View FIGURE 84 )

Type material. Holotype: ɗ, " TR [8] - Mersin, 1390 m, N Silifke, W Kirobasi, 36°44'02"N, 33°51'16"E, 19.IV.2005, leg. Brachat & Meybohm / Holotypus ɗ Xantholinus multispinosus sp. n. det. V. Assing 2006" (cAss). Paratype: ɗ, Mersin: Hacıahmetli, e. Mut, 1300 m / Anatolia mer., Heinz leg. 19.IV.1989 (cKor).

Description. Measurements (in mm) and ratios (holotype, paratype): AL: 2.20, 2.01; HL: 1.59, 1.51; HW: 1.27, 1.16; PW: 1.15, 1.01; PL: 1.60, 1.51; EL: 1.18, 1.04; EW: 1.39, 1.31; AW: 1.33, 1.28; TiL: 0.95, 0.89; TaL: 0.72, 0.72; ML: 1.39, – [squeezed]; TL: 10.3, 9.6; HL/HW: 1.25, 1.30; PW/HW: 0.90, 0.87; PL/PW: 1.39, 1.49; EL/PL: 0.740.69; EW/PW: 1.21, 1.30; AW/EW: 0.96, 0.98; TiL/TaL: 1.31, 1.22.

Habitus as in Fig. 63 View FIGURES 63 – 74 . Distinctly bicoloured species: head, pronotum, and abdomen blackish; elytra bright reddish; legs reddish brown; antennae dark reddish brown.

Head strongly oblong (see measurements and ratio HL/HW), weakly dilated posteriorly; lateral margins weakly convex in dorsal view ( Fig. 64 View FIGURES 63 – 74 ); eyes moderately small ( Fig. 65 View FIGURES 63 – 74 ), weakly projecting from lateral outline of head, little more than 1/4 the length of postocular region in dorsal view; dorsal surface with sparse, well-defined, and relatively coarse puncturation and with very few interspersed micropunctures, median dorsal area almost without coarse punctures; microsculpture absent. Antenna with antennomeres V–X weakly transverse, less than 1.5 times as wide as long ( Fig. 66 View FIGURES 63 – 74 ).

Pronotum distinctly narrower than head (see ratio PW/HW), distinctly tapering posteriad; lateral margins almost straight in dorsal view; dorsal series composed of 11–12 punctures; microsculpture absent ( Fig. 64 View FIGURES 63 – 74 ).

Elytra somewhat shorter and distinctly wider than pronotum (see ratios EL/PL and EW/PW), weakly dilated posteriad ( Fig. 64 View FIGURES 63 – 74 ); puncturation mostly well-defined, interstices on average slightly wider than diameter of punctures. Hind wings apparently fully developed. Legs relatively long (see measurements).

Abdomen slightly narrower than elytra, subparallel, segments III–VII of subequal width; puncturation fine, but distinct; all tergites with distinct transverse microsculpture; posterior margin of tergite VII with palisade fringe.

ɗ: posterior margins of tergite and sternite VIII weakly convex; aedeagus relatively large ( Figs. 67–68 View FIGURES 63 – 74 ), with internal structures composed of a long series of 35–40 long sclerotised spines (with some interspersed smaller spines), distally with a brush-like cluster of long and slender semitransparent spines and 3 additional short series of sclerotised spines: one of them composed of approximately 13–15 large and oblong spines (proximally extending into a series of numerous distinctly smaller semitransparent spines), one composed of 10 proximally very large and distally gradually smaller spines, and a central series composed of approximately 10 smaller spines ( Figs. 69–74 View FIGURES 63 – 74 ).

Comparative notes. Unlike many other subgenera and species groups of Xantholinus , the subgenus Helicophallus is characterised by relatively little interspecific variation of the aedeagal morphology, so that a separation of species based on an examination of an intact aedeagus may prove difficult. The internal structures are best evaluated after dissecting them, squeezing them (in order to make all spines visible), and examining them under a compound microscope.

From other Helicophallus species occurring in southern Turkey, X. multispinosus is separated as follows:

from X. tauricus (see Fig. 60 View FIGURES 60 – 62 ) by a larger aedeagus, by much more numerous spines of less oblong shape, and by the presence of a distal brush-like cluster of semitransparent spines;

from X. luteipennis (see Figs. 61–62 View FIGURES 60 – 62 ) by larger body size and by a larger aedeagus with distally longer and more slender spines, and distally with shorter and less slender spines;

from X. lividipennis (see figure 98C in Coiffait 1982) by larger body size and by an aedeagus with more numerous and distally larger and longer spines.

Since it was not possible to examine the holotype of X. lividipennis , which is deposited in the Fagel collection (see comments in section on X. rufipennis ), the comparison has to be based on the illustration by Coiffait (1972), which depicts an aedeagus with half-extruded internal structures and provides only rough details on the morphology of the internal structures.

Etymology. The name (Lat., adj.) refers to the great number of spines in the aedeagus. Distribution and bionomics. The species was discovered in two localities in Mersin, central southern Anatolia ( Fig. 84 View FIGURE 84 ), at altitudes of 1300 and nearly 1400 m.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Staphylinidae

SubFamily

Staphylininae

Tribe

Xantholinini

Genus

Xantholinus

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF