Tybalmia mydas ( Lucas, 1859 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5284.1.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:238A3877-7DC1-411B-BB60-93699AF68C98 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7921247 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0385D764-FFB2-FFA1-FF5B-9D8A9F0D3EEF |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tybalmia mydas ( Lucas, 1859 ) |
status |
|
Tybalmia mydas ( Lucas, 1859) View in CoL
( Figs 19–23 View FIGURES 19–23 , 37 View FIGURES 30–37 )
Oncideres mydas Lucas, 1859: 190 View in CoL .
Tybalmia mydas View in CoL ; Bates, 1872: 201.
Tybalmia tetrops Bates, 1872: 201 View in CoL . Syn. nov.
Note: see full references on Monné (2022) and Tavakilian & Chevillotte (2022).
Remarks. Lucas (1859) described Oncideres mydas based on a single male from the interior of Brazil. Bates (1872) described T. tetrops based on a single female from Brazil (Amazonas) and reported: “… near T. mydas, Lucas, Voy. de Castelnau, Ins. pl. 13, f. 2.” Therefore, it was Bates (1872) who transferred O. mydas to Tybalmia , and not Gemminger (1873) as indicated by Monné (2023) and Tavakilian & Chevillotte (2022). Since the original description, no other specimens of T. mydas have been formally reported. Dillon & Dillon (1945) provided a translation of the original description, and separated T. mydas from the other species of the genus in their key: “1. Elytra without a larger dark macula behind middle of each disk…. mydas . / Elytra with one or more larger maculae just behind middle of each disk… 2 [leading to the other species of the genus].” However, although the original description does not mention it, the illustration of the dorsal habitus ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 30–37 ) makes it evident that there are two larger dark maculae after middle of the elytra. In fact, these maculae are identical and in the same area as those in T. tetrops . Additionally, both maculae may be distinctly small, especially the outermost one ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 19–23 ). Both species have the three dark longitudinal bands on vertex (the median groove plus one on each side of it), and humerus with a single tubercle. According to Nearns & Tavakilian (2015), “The type specimen [ Oncideres mydas ] is not found in MNHN [Museum national d’Histoire naturelle] collection and is presumed to be lost.” Comparing photograph of the holotype of T. tetrops , illustrations of the holotype of T. mydas , and the original descriptions, it is possible to conclude that they are, respectively, a female and a male of the same species. Therefore, T. tetrops is synonymized with T. mydas .
Current geographical distribution. Ecuador, Peru, Brazil (Amazonas).
Material examined. BRAZIL, Amazonas: Benjamin Constant, Rio Javari , 1 female, VIII.1962, local collector ( MZSP, formerly Diringshofen collection) ; 1 male, XII.1961, local collector ( MZSP, formerly Diringshofen collection) ; 1 female, X.1962, local collector ( MZSP, formerly Diringshofen collection). Ceará (new state record): Carquejo , 1 female, IV.1966, local collector ( MZSP, formerly Diringshofen collection) .
MZSP |
Sao Paulo, Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Tybalmia mydas ( Lucas, 1859 )
Vlasak, Josef & Santos-Silva, Antonio 2023 |
Tybalmia mydas
Bates, H. W. 1872: 201 |
Tybalmia tetrops
Bates, H. W. 1872: 201 |
Oncideres mydas
Lucas, P. H. 1859: 190 |