Turanosuchus aralensis, Kuzmin & Skutschas & Boitsova & Sues, 2019

Kuzmin, Ivan T, Skutschas, Pavel P, Boitsova, Elizaveta A & Sues, Hans-Dieter, 2019, Revision of the large crocodyliform Kansajsuchus (Neosuchia) from the Late Cretaceous of Central Asia, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 185 (2), pp. 335-387 : 361-368

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zly027

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CBEF5F-FFF0-9620-FC46-FDEEEBC3CF25

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Turanosuchus aralensis
status

 

KANSAJSUCHUS SP. CF. K. EXTENSUS

1988a Turanosuchus aralensis gen. et sp. nov. – Efimov

1988b Turanosuchus aralensis – Efimov

2000 Turanosuchus aralensis (Efimov) – Storrs & Efimov

2015 Neosuchia (? Goniopholididae ) indet. – Halliday et al.

2015 Kansajsuchus extensus ( Efimov, 1975) – Skutschas et al.

Referred material: Isolated cranial and postcranial fragments, teeth, osteoderms ( PIN collection number 2229, ZIN PH collection number 180; see Supporting Information, File S1 for the detailed list of specimens). Locality: Shakh Shakh locality, north-eastern Aral Sea Region, Kyzylorda Province, Kazakhstan; Bostobe Formation, Santonian–early Campanian.

Description

Cranium: Premaxilla ( Fig. 16A, D, E View Figure 16 ): The premaxilla is represented by two partial specimens ( Fig. 16A, D, E View Figure 16 ). Its posterodorsal process forms a sharp wedge posteriorly and contacts the nasal medially and the maxilla laterally. The suture with the nasal is oblique and oriented anteromedially.

Maxilla ( Fig. 16A–C View Figure 16 ): The structure of the maxilla is partially documented by a number of specimens; PIN 2229/502 (a fragmentary anterior rostrum, right side) is the most anatomically informative specimen ( Fig. 16A–C View Figure 16 ). Proportionally, the maxilla is relatively narrow lateromedially, indicating an elongated and narrow rostrum (also noted by Halliday et al., 2015). It contacts the premaxilla anteriorly and the nasal medially along a straight suture. The anterior maxillary alveoli gradually increase in size posteriorly, with, presumably, the fourth and the fifth being the largest ( Fig. 16B, C View Figure 16 ). The maxillary alveoli are closely spaced. In dorsal view, the maxilla is clearly festooned in its anterior part. The lateral projection of the maxillary margin corresponds to the position of enlarged alveoli. In lateral view, the maxilla has a slightly sinuous shape; its anteriormost tip is curved upwards. The dorsal surface of the maxilla has pitted ornamentation; its alveolar margin is smooth.

Nasal ( Fig. 16A–G View Figure 16 ): The nasal is mediolaterally narrow, anteroposteriorly elongated and has straight, sub-parallel lateral and medial margins ( Fig. 16A, D–G View Figure 16 ). It is dorsoventrally flattened. The nasal tapers considerably at its contact with the premaxilla ( Fig. 16A, D View Figure 16 ). The dorsal surface is ornamented with pits and grooves.

Jugal ( Fig. 16H–N View Figure 16 ): The jugal is represented by five fragmentary specimens, which correspond to the anterior process ( Fig. 16H–J View Figure 16 ) or the mid-section of the jugal near the base of the postorbital bar ( Fig. 16K–N View Figure 16 ). The anterior process is dorsoventrally deep, mediolaterally flattened and plate-like. The medial surface of the process bears a facet for contact with the lacrimal anterodorsally ( Fig. 16I View Figure 16 ). Posterior to this facet, the jugal forms the ventral orbital margin. The latter is ridge-like, with a shallow depression on the lateral surface of the jugal ventral to this ridge ( Fig. 16J View Figure 16 ). The postorbital bar is inset from the lateral margin of the jugal. The base of the ascending process is rounded in cross-section ( Fig. 16N View Figure 16 ). The jugal has a hollow recess inside at the base of the ascending process. This recess is connected to several openings on the external surface of the jugal (multiple foramina on the medial surface of the anterior process and a single opening posterior to the base of the ascending process; Fig. 16I, L, N View Figure 16 ). The jugal bears a facet for contact with the ectopterygoid on its medial surface ( Fig. 16I, L View Figure 16 ). The lateral surface of the jugal is covered with a pitted ornamentation and bears a longitudinal ridge ( Fig. 16H, M View Figure 16 ). On the ventral edge of the anterior process, there is a series of four to six neurovascular foramina.

Ectopterygoid ( Fig. 16K View Figure 16 ): The structure of the ectopterygoid is incompletely known from a couple of specimens( ZINPH 5/180,fragmentofaleftectopterygoid; PIN 2229/508, partial left ectopterygoid preserved in an anatomical association with a fragment of the jugal). Additional information on the ectopterygoid can be inferred from the articular facet on the jugal ( Fig. 16I, L View Figure 16 ). The ectopterygoid is posteroventrally deflected as in other neosuchians. Its anterior process is elongated and contacts the maxilla anterolaterally and the jugal posterolaterally ( Fig. 16I View Figure 16 ). The posterior process of the ectopterygoid contacts the jugal at the base of the postorbital bar ( Fig. 16K View Figure 16 ). The ascending process does not contribute significantly to the postorbital bar. The contact with the descending process of the postorbital is present on the medial surface of the postorbital bar but is not extensive ( Fig. 16K View Figure 16 ).

Frontal ( Fig. 17A–E View Figure 17 ): The unpaired frontal is represented by three partial specimens of different sizes, which preserve the posterior interorbital and skull table sections ( Fig. 17A–E View Figure 17 ). Its anterior process is relatively wide mediolaterally (even in the smallest specimen, ZIN PH 27/180; Fig. 17D View Figure 17 ) and only slightly narrower between orbits than the skull table portion of the frontal. The frontal forms the anteromedial corners of the supratemporal fenestrae. The lateral margins of the anterior process preserve the facet for the prefrontals. The degree of the frontal participation in the formation of the medial orbital margin differs among the available specimens. The smallest specimen ( ZIN PH 27/180; Fig. 17D, E View Figure 17 ) shows considerable frontal participation in the medial orbital margin, comparable to that in Paralligator spp. The orbital margins are ridge-like and distinctly upturned ( Fig. 17E View Figure 17 ). In the largest specimen, ZIN PH 26/180 ( Fig. 17A, B View Figure 17 ), the frontal forms only the small posteromedial corners of the orbits (bordered by facets for the postorbital and prefrontal). A medium-sized specimen ( PIN 2229/510; Fig. 17C View Figure 17 ) shows an intermediate degree of frontal participation. As ontogenetic and intraspecific variability of this feature has been observed (see comparison below), we consider the difference among specimens to be a size- and, possibly, age-related feature. The frontal bears a pronounced sagittal ridge on the dorsal surface of its anterior process. The dorsal surface of the frontal is densely pitted.

Parietal ( Fig. 17I–K View Figure 17 ): The unpaired parietal forms the interfenestral bar between the supratemporal fenestrae, which were likely moderately enlarged, as suggested by the sizes of corresponding notches on the lateral margins of the parietal ( Fig. 17I View Figure 17 ). The parietal contacts the frontal anteriorly along a transversely straight suture and the supraoccipital ventrally. Facets for contact with the laterosphenoid and prootic are present on the ventral surface of the parietal ( Fig. 17J View Figure 17 ). The dorsal surface has pitted ornamentation. A slight sagittal ridge is present on the dorsal surface but it is damaged. The parietal pneumatic recess is apparently present and connected to the intertympanic recess in the supraoccipital by two pairs of foramina – larger anterolateral, situated near the parietal-prootic-supraoccipital contact, and smaller slit-like posteromedial foramina ( Fig. 17J View Figure 17 ).

Squamosal ( Fig. 17F–H View Figure 17 ): The squamosal is represented by a partial anterior process of the right element, articulated with a fragment of the postorbital ( ZIN PH 36/180). The dorsoventrally deep lateral lamina of the anterior process projects anteriorly and overlaps the postorbital laterally ( Fig. 17H View Figure 17 ). Ventrally, there is a facet for contact with the quadrate ( Fig. 17F View Figure 17 ). The dorsal surface of the anterior process is densely ornamented, whereas the lateral surface is smooth, with a groove for the muscles associated with an external ear flap ( Fig. 17G, H View Figure 17 ).

Supraoccipital ( Fig. 17I–K View Figure 17 ): The supraoccipital is represented by a single specimen ZIN PH 28/180, which lacks the ventral portion of the element. It contacts the parietal dorsally; the contacts with the prootic anteroventrally and the otoccipitals posteroventrally are not preserved. The supraoccipital apparently extends on to the skull roof ( Fig. 17I, K View Figure 17 ); the suture is clearly seen in posterior view, but is barely traceable on the dorsal surface of the specimen. The occipital (posterior) surface of the supraoccipital is strongly compressed, but was apparently vertical and lacked a prominent sagittal ridge. The supraoccipital contains the large intertympanic recess ( Fig. 17J View Figure 17 ).

Mandible: Dentary ( Fig. 18A–G View Figure 18 ): The structure of the dentary is known from a number of specimens: PIN 2229 View Materials /507 (the mandibular symphysis, originally designated as the holotype of ‘ Turanosuchus aralensis ’; Fig.18A–C View Figure 18 ), PIN 2229 View Materials /506 and PIN 2229 View Materials /515 (two partial specimens, corresponding to the mid-posterior portion of the dentary; Fig. 18D–G View Figure 18 ). The mandibular symphysis is anteroposteriorly elongated, lateromedially narrow and relatively flat. The dentary symphysis extends posteriorly to the level of the seventh or eighth alveolus ( Fig. 18A View Figure 18 ). The anterior alveoli gradually increase in size up to the fourth, which is the largest. This alveolus is distinct in both dorsal and lateral views ( Fig. 18A, B View Figure 18 ). The lateral margin of the dentary is festooned in dorsal view, corresponding to changes in alveolar size. The alveolar arrangement is linear, as there are no two neighbouring alveoli positioned in the same transverse plane. The alveoli are closely spaced, with small interalveolar distances posterior to the fourth alveolus. Other fragmentary specimens ( PIN 2229 View Materials /506 and PIN 2229 View Materials /515) also show this feature. They are dorsoventrally deeper than PIN 2229 View Materials /507. This difference is considered to reflect changes in the depth of the dentary along the mandibular ramus, rather than a characteristic feature of a different neosuchian taxon (contra Halliday et al., 2015) .

Splenial ( Fig. 18H, I View Figure 18 ): The splenial is a dorsoventrally deep and lateromedially thin bone. It participates in the mandibular symphysis, as is evidenced by a small splenial fragment in PIN 2229/507 ( Fig. 18C View Figure 18 ; thin lamina of bone attached to the medial surface of a left dentary) and by a corresponding facet on the medial surface of ZIN PH 32/180 (anterior fragment of a right splenial; Fig. 18H View Figure 18 ). The dorsal margin of the splenial is slightly convex and smooth; its ventral margin is sharp and ridge-like. There is an anteroposteriorly extending facet for contact with the dentary on the lateral surface of the splenial, divided by the centrally located Meckelian groove ( Fig. 18I View Figure 18 ).

Angular ( Fig. 18M–O View Figure 18 ): The angular smoothly arches posterodorsally. Its anteroventral process preserves facets for contact with the dentary both medially and laterally ( Fig. 18M, O View Figure 18 ). Most of the laterodorsal margin, which corresponds to the contacts with the dentary and surangular, respectively, is damaged. The angular forms the floor of the adductor cavity; posterior to it, the facet for the contact with the articular is present ( Fig. 18N View Figure 18 ). The lateral surface of the angular is covered by pits. A prominent, obliquely longitudinal ridge extends posteroventrally ( Fig. 18O View Figure 18 ).

Surangular ( Fig. 18J–L View Figure 18 ): A fragment of the surangular is present in anatomical articulation with the articular ( PIN 2229/504). The surangular forms the lateral margin of the glenoid fossa ( Fig. 18J View Figure 18 ). A facet for contact with the angular is present on the ventral margin of the surangular ( Fig. 18L View Figure 18 ). The surangular extends posteriorly to the base of the retroarticular process. Its lateral surface has pitted ornamentation.

Articular ( Fig. 18J–L View Figure 18 ): The structure of the articular is partially documented by a single specimen ( PIN 2229/504). The glenoid facet of the craniomandibular joint is mostly formed by the articular, with the surangular participating only in its lateral corner. A prominent transverse ridge bounds the glenoid posteriorly ( Fig. 18J, L View Figure 18 ). Only the base of the retroarticular process is preserved. Considering the shape of the preserved portion, the retroarticular process was relatively horizontal and not as curved posterodorsally as in extant crocodylians.

Dentition: All available teeth show similar crown structure: they are coarsely striated and have prominent distal and mesial keels (bicarinate condition sensu Storrs & Efimov, 2000; double-ridged pattern sensu Halliday et al., 2015). The teeth vary in shape from tall and conical to blunt and short ( Fig. 17L, M View Figure 17 ). The larger teeth have robust crowns comparable to those of K. extensus (see above). Most of the teeth have rounded bases; however, lateromedially flattened teeth (corresponding to the posterior cheek region) are also present ( Fig. 17M View Figure 17 ). The latter morphotype has a finer pattern of striae on the crown surface.

Postcranial skeleton: Vertebrae ( Fig. 19A–H View Figure 19 ): The structure of the dorsal vertebrae is documented by a number of specimens ( Fig. 19A–H View Figure 19 ; see also Supporting Information, File S1). All recovered vertebrae have amphicoelous centra with slightly concave to almost flat posterior articular surfaces. The centrum is anteroposteriorly longer than dorsoventrally deep. The pedicles of the neural arches are dorsoventrally low and anteroposteriorly elongated ( Fig. 19C, F View Figure 19 ). The neural spine base is anteroposteriorly elongated and extends for most of the dorsal surface of the neural arch ( Fig. 19D View Figure 19 ). ZIN PH 11/180 ( Fig. 19G, H View Figure 19 ) is dorsoventrally slightly compressed compared to other recovered dorsals. It has paired articular surfaces posterolaterally. The shape of its centrum and the presence of these additional articular surfaces suggest that ZIN PH 11/180 is probably a posteriormost dorsal vertebra, immediately anterior to the first sacral.

Osteoderms ( Fig. 19I – O View Figure 1 View Figure 2 View Figure 3 View Figure 4 View Figure 5 View Figure 6 View Figure 7 View Figure 8 View Figure 9 ): A large number of osteoderms and osteoderm fragments of relatively large size was recovered. The available material is similar in its structure to that described in detail for K. extensus . Two morphotypes are represented: keeled paravertebral dorsal osteoderms ( Fig. 19I– N View Figure 19 ) and unkeeled polygonal ventral osteoderms ( Fig. 19O View Figure 19 ). The paravertebral dorsal elements are mostly rectangular, with keels restricted to the posterior margins of the osteoderms. Paravertebral osteoderms lack the anterolateral processes but have lateromedially extensive, unornamented anterior processes (for imbrication with adjacent elements in a longitudinal row). The dorsal osteoderms were arranged in at least four longitudinal rows, as indicated by the presence of paired articular facets on lateral and medial margins of several elements (e.g. ZIN PH 15/180; Fig. 19K, L View Figure 19 ). ZIN PH 16/180 is strongly curved dorsally ( Fig. 19K View Figure 19 ). Most likely this specimen reflects the structure of dorsal osteoderms from a particular shield area, which is not otherwise sampled in the material from the Kansai locality. The ventral osteoderms were sutured together and formed the ventral shield, as indicated by their straight margins with sutural facets ( Fig. 19O View Figure 19 ). All recovered osteoderms are similarly densely pitted on their external surfaces.

PIN

Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences

ZIN

Russian Academy of Sciences, Zoological Institute, Zoological Museum

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF