Triphoris (Ino) sculptus Hinds, 1843
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.95.32803 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0F66F482-B7AB-4A5C-A611-68EC01012D41 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9583CDF7-133F-6558-FC53-CD51B87AC702 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Triphoris (Ino) sculptus Hinds, 1843 |
status |
|
Triphoris (Ino) sculptus Hinds, 1843 View in CoL
Figure 37 View Figure 37
Triphoris (Ino) sculptus Hinds 1843b: 17, not illustrated. Illustration available in Hinds (1844): 28, pl. 8, fig. 3.
Type locality.
Straits of Malacca.
Type material.
Syntypes: NHMUK 1844.6.7.17- 19, 3 specimens, Straits of Malacca (coll. E. Belcher) ; NHMUK 1855.11.15.20, 1 specimen, no locality (coll. E. Belcher) ; NHMUK 1879.2.26.201, 1 specimen, Straits of Malacca (J. Lombe-Taylor coll.) .
Original description.
Testa pallide rufente; anfractibus 15-18 biseriatim granoso-carinatis, medio laevigatis carina secundaria; prope suturam carinula monilifera; sinu laterali patulo. Axis 4½ lin.
Geog. Straits of Malacca; in 3 fathoms.
Translation of the Latin text.
Shell pale reddish; 15-18 whorls with two granulated-keeled cords, with a smooth interspace with a secondary keel; a thin granulated keel near the suture; open posterior sinus. Height 4½ lines.
Diagnosis.
Subadult syntypes ca 9 mm high. Shell conical, with flat whorls bearing two quite thin main spiral cords with large oblong tubercles at the intersection with broad axial ribs. A third very fine spiral cord develops early in the teleoconch but never attains the strength of the other two whereas a fourth smooth cord is visible above the suture. A microsculpture of very fine threads is visible between the main cords. The apex is incomplete, but clearly bears a brown multispiral protoconch whose last two whorls have two strong spiral keels and axial riblets. The teleoconch has a whitish background with orange to brown flammulae.
Remarks.
All available syntypes are subadults without a fully developed last whorl and peristome. Specimens NHMUK 1844.6.7.17 (Fig. 37A, B View Figure 37 ) and NHMUK 1844.6.7.19 (Fig. 37H View Figure 37 ) are probably those that best fit the figure by Hinds (1844) in terms of sculpture, colour pattern and shell profile. In contrast, NHMUK 1844.6.7.18 (Fig. 37G View Figure 37 ) has a much more slender profile and resembles Triphoris bilix Hinds, 1844 (p. 185), NHMUK 1879.2.26.201 (Fig. 37J View Figure 37 ) is again more slender and has more numerous tubercles on the third spiral cord, superficially resembling T. concors Hinds, 1844 (p. 193), and NHMUK 1855.11.15.20 might be a Triphoris sculptus , but it is too ruined for proper identification.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Triphoris (Ino) sculptus Hinds, 1843
Albano, Paolo G., Bakker, Piet A. J. & Sabelli, Bruno 2019 |
Triphoris (Ino) sculptus
Hinds 1843 |