Oxyethira (Trichoglene) columba (Neboiss)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.279936 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6170257 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D61735-AB7B-A338-5A9A-35F8CBCBD9FD |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Oxyethira (Trichoglene) columba (Neboiss) |
status |
|
Oxyethira (Trichoglene) columba (Neboiss) View in CoL
Trichoglene columba Neboiss, 1977: 43 View in CoL
Oxyethira columba ( Neboiss, 1977) View in CoL ; Wells 1981: 106 Oxyethira (Trichoglene) columba ( Neboiss, 1977) View in CoL ; Kelley 1984: 436 Oxyethira elora Olah & Johanson, 2010: 33 ; syn. nov.
The holotype of Oxyethira elora Olah & Johanson, 2010 , is from Tasmania, as are a number of specimens Olah and Johanson designated as paratypes; another paratype is from Carnarvon Gorge in central Queensland. Upon examination of the holotype, it was found to be indistinguishable from that of Oxyethira columba (Neboiss) View in CoL with which it is here synonymised. Oxyethira columba View in CoL is widespread and often abundant in Tasmania and on mainland Australia, where it occurs from Fleurieu Peninsula and Kangaroo Island in South Australia through the Grampians of Victoria to the east and northeast in streams on both sides of the Dividing Range to just north of Townsville in northern Queensland.
Males of Oxyethira columba View in CoL show some variability in proportions of genitalic structures. However, in a morphometric study on various genitalic structures of O. columba View in CoL undertaken some years ago, Wells (unpublished data) was unable to demonstrate any significant difference in their proportions, or, using multivariate analysis, between populations, thus postulating that they all represent a discrete species. Much of the apparent variability appears to be attributable to the degree to which the genitalia are cleared and relaxed, and the magnification and angle at which the specimens are viewed. The major differences between Oxyethira columba View in CoL and Oxyethira elora as illustrated and described by Olah and Johanson (2010) are the shapes of segment IX, the spine on the aedeagus and the dorso-apical processes (but the first is close to that illustrated by Wells (1981), and the perception of the latter two depends upon the angle at which the structures are viewed). However, examination of the holotype of Oxyethira elora itself shows that it conforms to Oxyethira columba View in CoL in all respects.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Oxyethira (Trichoglene) columba (Neboiss)
Wells, Alice 2012 |
Oxyethira columba (
Olah 2010: 33 |
Kelley 1984: 436 |
Wells 1981: 106 |
Trichoglene columba
Neboiss 1977: 43 |