Tetragonoschema (Tetragonoschema) cupreocingulatum Hoscheck, 1931
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3521.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9E2E5303-FBEA-44F7-92D4-05B2E608EB25 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5911738 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/833687D8-FC59-0C49-C494-FF310088F00C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tetragonoschema (Tetragonoschema) cupreocingulatum Hoscheck, 1931 |
status |
|
Tetragonoschema (Tetragonoschema) cupreocingulatum Hoscheck, 1931 View in CoL
( Figs. 10 View FIGURES 10 – 18 , 45 View FIGURES 37 – 45. 37 – 40 , 78 View FIGURES 72 – 81 )
Tetragonoschema cupreocingulatum Hoscheck, 1931a: 163 View in CoL . Type locality: Bolivia, Chaco, Tunamá, Chiquitos.
Tetragonoschema cupreocingulatum: Blackwelder, 1944: 315 View in CoL (checklist); Théry, 1944: 14 (catalogue, key, redescription); Bellamy, 2008: 1519 (catalogue).
Type specimens studied. Number of syntypes unknown; lectotype ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 10 – 18 ), here designated (male, ISNB): “Bol. [ivia], Tunamá Chiq.[uitos], x.[19]26, Lind, D. Chaco-Exped.[ition] [p] // Coll. R. I. Sc. N. B. Amerique Tropicale [p, violet] // Tetragonoschema cupreocingulatum m. n. sp. Typ! [p] Det. Hoscheck 1929 [p] // Syntype [p, red]”.
Further specimens studied. ARGENTINA. SALTA: Tartagal, xii.1950, J. Daguerre leg. (1 female, NMNH) ; TUCUMÁN: iii.1948, R. Golbach leg. (1 male, MNCN) ; BOLIVIA. SANTA CRUZ: Cordillara, Tucuaca, 23.x.2001, Jose L. Aramayo leg. (3 males, 1 female, ISNB) ; BRAZIL. MATTO GROSSO: 1886, P. Germail leg. (1 male, NMHN) ; PARAGUAY. BOQUÉRON: Enciso NP, 21°12ʹS 61°38ʹW, 257m, 9.–11.xii.2010, Sv. Bílý leg. (1 male, NMPC) ; Loma Plata, 22°23ʹS 59°50ʹW, 141m, 5.–7.xii.2010, Barries, Bílý & Cate leg. (2 males, 2 females, NMPC; 2 males, 2 females, WBCW) .
Diagnosis. Small, length: 3.3–3.8 mm, somewhat elongate with bicolorous elytra (black with a red pattern); in its colouration it resembles T. (T.) rubromarginatum , T. (T.) humerale and T. (T.) trinidadense ; it differs from T. (T.) rubromarginatum in being smaller, the narrower elytral epipleura not reaching elytral suture and not being visible from above, and by the form of male genitalia ( Figs. 78 View FIGURES 72 – 81 vs. 75); from T. (T.) humerale and T. (T.) trinidadense it differs by the longer elytra (1.30 times as long as wide) and by the parameres which bear a preapical spine ( Fig. 78 View FIGURES 72 – 81 ).
Since the number of syntypes is unknown I hereby designate the male from ISNB as the lectotype of T. cupreocingulatum Hoscheck, 1931 .
Bionomy. Unknown. Specimens from Paraguay (Enciso, Loma Plata) were collected in very dry, semidesert biotops of so called “Dry Chaco” (Chaco seco).
Sexual dimorphism. No dimorphism apparent.
Distribution. Argentina (new country record), Bolivia, Brazil (new country record), Paraguay (new country record).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Tetragonoschema (Tetragonoschema) cupreocingulatum Hoscheck, 1931
Bílý, Svatopluk 2012 |
Tetragonoschema cupreocingulatum
Bellamy 2008: 1519 |
Blackwelder 1944: 315 |
Thery 1944: 14 |
Hoscheck 1931: 163 |