Tenedos luzmarinae, Martínez & Brescovit & Quijano, 2022

Martínez, Leonel, Brescovit, Antonio D. & Quijano, Luis G., 2022, Revealing the diversity of ant-eating spiders in Colombia I: morphology, distribution and taxonomy of the barronus group of the genus Tenedos O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1897 (Araneae: Zodariidae), Zootaxa 5130 (1), pp. 1-154 : 79-82

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5130.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:ABF61117-DD64-4A32-BD61-20E577F80C3D

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6520629

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C787B1-FFB3-FFC7-D49C-FF3C0EE6F9C1

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Tenedos luzmarinae
status

sp. nov.

Tenedos luzmarinae View in CoL sp. n.

Figs 54–56 View FIGURE 54 View FIGURE 55 View FIGURE 56 ; 106 View FIGURE 106 .

Type material. Holotype: COLOMBIA. Sucre: Secondary dry forest fragment, Winkler extractor, L. Franco leg., IV.2009, 1 ♂ (IAvH-I-3731) . Paratypes: same data as the holotype, 1 ♀ (IAvH-I-3441) , 2 ♂ (IAvH-I-3791) , 1 ♂ 1 ♀ ( IBSP 276624 View Materials ) .

Etymology. The specific epithet is given in honor of Luz Marina Cuervo Sepulveda, mother of the third author for her support and love.

Diagnosis. Males of Tenedos luzmarinae sp. n. resemble those of T. peckorum Jocqué & Baert, 2002 , T. quipile sp. n., T. mesa sp. n., and T. henrardi sp. n., by having complex retrolateral tibial apophysis (RTA); large median apophysis (MA) with quadrangular-shaped anterior branch and tubular posterior one (see Jocqué & Baert, 2002: 111, fig. 29A–B; figs 34C–F; 36A–D; 37A–B; 38C–F; 40A–B; 42A–D; 43A–B; 44A–F; 46A–D; 47A–B; 55A–D; 56A–B), but can be distinguished by longer, thinner, apically curved anterior branch of median apophysis (aMA); retrolateral tibial apophysis (RTA) with bifid and wide anterior branch (aRTA), long posterior branch (pRTA), apically rounded ( Figs 55A–D View FIGURE 55 ; 56A–B View FIGURE 56 ). Females are similar those of Tenedos barronus Jocqué & Baert, 2002 , T. hoeferi Jocqué & Baert, 2002 , and T. quadrangulatus Jocqué & Baert, 2002 , by long seminal receptacles (SR) curved towards median septum of epigyne (see Jocqué & Baert, 2002: 87, 100, 116, figs 10C–D, 18D–E, 33A–B; figs 12E–F; 13C–D; 55E–F; 56C–D), but are characterized by elongated atrium (A) and tongue-shaped median field plate (MFP) ( Figs 55E–F View FIGURE 55 ; 56C–D View FIGURE 56 ).

Description. Male (IAvH-I-3731). Coloration ( Fig. 54A–B View FIGURE 54 ): carapace dark brown. Chelicerae with paturon base dark brown, apically brown, fangs brown-reddish. Endites brown, white on anterior region. Labium and sternum brown. Legs: coxae-tarsi I–IV light brown with dark patches. Abdomen: dorsally dark gray with eight white guanine spots organized as follows: two large and rounded spots, anteriorly positioned; two irregular and elongated spots smaller than anterior ones, on posteromedial position; two irregular spots larger than anterior ones and with an anterior notch, medially positioned; two transversal spots partially fused in median region, posteriorly positioned. Laterally dark gray with a wide oblique band. Ventrally covered by a large spot. Spinnerets light brown. Measurements: total length 4.62, carapace length 2.51, width 1.71, height 1.08. Clypeus height 0.51. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.09, ALE 0.10, PME 0.12, PLE 0.14; AME–AME 0.18, AME–ALE 0.23, AME–PME 0.25, PME–PME 0.25, PME–PLE 0.34, ALE–PLE 0.28. Chelicerae 0.58 length. Sternum length 0.94, width 0.84. Legs: I—femur 1.54/ patella 0.65/ tibia 1.51/ metatarsus 1.58/ tarsus 0.96/ total 6.24; II—1.39/ 0.58/ 1.09/ 1.13/ 0.69/ 4.88; III—1.43/ 0.57/ 0.93/ 1.23/ 0.81/ 4.97; IV—1.55/ 0.66/ 1.45/ 2.08/ 0.84/ 6.58. Abdomen length 2.09. Legs spines pattern (only the differences from the general pattern): II—metatarsus v1r-1r-2 (1r-1-1r-2); III—tibia v2-2-2; IV—tibia v2-2-2. Palp: retrolateral process of cymbium (RPC) thin, wide at base; tegulum (T) sub-rounded, almost as wide as long; subtegulum (St) almost as long as wide in ventral view, with rounded external edge; conductor (C) moderately developed, with long, strongly sclerotized region on distal side; appendix (ApC) long, apically sharp; embolus (E) long, wide at base, filiform towards apex; base of embolus (EB) approximately as wide as basal tegular membrane; basal tegular membrane (BTM) very short and flattened ending as a short tip; spermatic ducts (SD) both folds full open; ventral tibial apophysis (VTA) large, tubular, curved; median apophysis (MA) bifid, with rectangular anterior branch (aMA), posterior branch (pMA) very short, tubular; retrolateral tibial apophysis (RTA) large, complex with bifid anterior branch (aRTA) ( Figs 55A–D View FIGURE 55 ; 56A–B View FIGURE 56 ).

Female (IAvH-I-3441). Coloration ( Fig. 54C–D View FIGURE 54 ): Coloration and abdominal spots pattern as male, carapace uniformly brown and posterior spots completely fused. Measurements: total length 5.87, carapace length 2.69, width 1.83, height 1.18. Clypeus height 0.55. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.08, ALE 0.09, PME 0.12, PLE 0.15; AME–AME 0.18, AME–ALE 0.26, AME–PME 0.24, PME–PME 0.26, PME–PLE 0.41, ALE–PLE 0.30. Chelicerae 0.79 length. Sternum length 0.94, width 0.84. Legs: I—femur 1.25/ patella 0.70/ tibia 1.33/ metatarsus 1.35/ tarsus 0.72/ total 5.35; II—1.30/ 0.62/ 0.97/ 1.03/ 0.69/ 4.61; III—1.38/ 0.69/ 0.91/ 1.16/ 0.76/ 4.90; IV—1.70/ 0.63/ 1.49/ 1.89/ 0.99/ 6.70. Abdomen length 3.19. Legs spines pattern (only the differences from the general pattern): I—tibia v2-1p-2, p0, metatarsus v1r-1r-2; II—tibia v1r-1r-2; III—metatarsus v2-0-2. Epigyne: lateral borders (LB) short, in posteromedial position, forming elongated atrium (A), rounded in anterior region; median field plate (MFP) longer than wide, rounded in basal edge; copulatory ducts (CD) very short, wide, almost undistinguished from spermathecae; seminal receptacles (SR) long, thin, curved towards median septum; spermathecae (S) large, rounded, posteriorly positioned; fertilization ducts (FD) approximately as long as spermathecae length ( Figs 55E–F View FIGURE 55 ; 56C–D View FIGURE 56 ).

Distribution. Known from Sucre department, Colombia ( Fig. 106 View FIGURE 106 ).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Zodariidae

Genus

Tenedos

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF