Spheromolgus rarus, Kim & Boxshall, 2021

Kim, Il-Hoi & Boxshall, Geoff A., 2021, Copepods associated with Ascidian hosts (Tunicata): Intramolgidae and Lichomolgidae, with descriptions of four new genera and 13 new species, Zootaxa 5013 (1), pp. 1-75 : 57-60

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5013.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BBB1CB11-1AEA-4678-8F6C-B43B7F35E453

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8D4A87BF-FF83-FFB5-FF19-FA719948F994

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Spheromolgus rarus
status

gen. et sp. nov.

Spheromolgus rarus gen. et sp. nov.

( Figs. 36 View FIGURE 36 , 37 View FIGURE 37 )

Type material. Holotype ♀ (MNHN-IU-2014-21606, dissected and mounted on a slide) from aẚplosoma sẚmẚle (Sluiter, 1909): Iles Mescha, Djibouti, intertidal, Monniot coll., October 1996

Additional non-type material. 1 ♀ (MNHN-IU-2014-21492, dissected) in aK sẚmẚle (MNHN-IT-2008-3609 = MNHN A2 About MNHN /DIP.A/55), Canal Woodin , Grande Terre, New Caledonia, Stn NC 23, depth 3 m, Monniot coll., 18 September 1985 .

Etymology. The name is derived from the Latin rar (=rare), alluding to the discovery of only single specimens of the new species at each of the two localities.

Description of female. Body ( Fig. 36A View FIGURE 36 ) broad; body length 1.01 mm; prosome 690×536 μm, occupying 68% of body length. Cephalothorax spherical, 490 μm long. Urosome ( Fig. 36B View FIGURE 36 ) stocky, 5-segmented; fifth pedigerous somite 120 μm wide; genital double-somite wider than long (140×153 μm), widest at about 70% of length of dou- ble-somite; genital apertures large, located dorsolaterally at widest region. Three free abdominal somites 25×71, 20×66, and 45×71 μm, respectively; anal somite with large anal region and row of spinules along posteroventral margin ( Fig. 36C View FIGURE 36 ). Caudal ramus ( Fig. 36C View FIGURE 36 ) broad, about 1.5 times longer than wide (46×30 μm), and ornamented with row of spinules along posteroventral margin; armed with 6 naked setae, lateral seta (seta II) positioned at 65% of ramus length.

Rostrum ( Fig. 36D View FIGURE 36 ) broad, semicircular. Antennule ( Fig. 36E View FIGURE 36 ) 218 μm long, 7-segmented; first segment broad- ened; armature formula 4, 13, 6, 3, 4+aesthetasc. 2+aesthetasc, and 7+aesthetasc; all setae naked. Antenna ( Fig. 36F View FIGURE 36 ) 4-segmented, with armature formula 1, 1, 4, and 3+3 claws; terminal segment about 2.2 times longer than wide (59×27 μm); 3 terminal claws annulated, unequal in length and thickness, 64, 31, 18 μm long, respectively; 1 seta on each of third and terminal segments minute, setule-like.

Labrum ( Fig. 36G View FIGURE 36 ) with relatively small posterolateral lobes, separated by broad, shallow median incision; with transverse row of minute spinules at mid-posterior region. Mandible ( Fig. 36H View FIGURE 36 ) blade slightly broadened with spinulose inner margin perpendicular to distal lash; lash rather short bearing 2 rows of denticles along convex outer margin and few minute spinules on inner margin. Maxillule ( Fig. 36I View FIGURE 36 ) with 1 minute subdistal and 2 distal setae. Maxilla ( Fig. 36J View FIGURE 36 ) consisting of syncoxa and basis; syncoxa broad, unarmed; basis terminating in recurved distal lash and 2 setae (setae I and II); distal lash thin, elongate, with row of long spinules along outer margin and several, shorter spinules on proximal part of inner margin; inner seta (seta I) spiniform, ornamented with broad spinules along outer margin and small spinules along inner margin; anterior seta (seta II) abruptly narrowed from middle, with thin, needle-like distal half. Maxilliped ( Fig. 36K View FIGURE 36 ) 3-segmented; fist segment unarmed; second segment with protruding, convex inner margin bearing 1 blunt tubercle proximally plus 2 small setae; terminal segment claw-like, narrowing distally, with 2 small setae proximally, and ornamented with row of about 5 spinules in distal half.

Legs 1, 2 ( Fig. 37A, B View FIGURE 37 ) and 3 with 3-segmented rami. Leg 3 same as leg 2 except third endopodal segment bearing 3 spines and 2 setae ( Fig. 37C View FIGURE 37 ). Leg 4 ( Fig. 37D View FIGURE 37 ) with 3-segmented exopod and 2-segmented endopod. Inner coxal seta of legs 1-3 well-developed, pinnate, that of leg 4 small and naked. Outer seta on basis sparsely pinnate in legs 1 and 4, but naked in legs 2 and 3. Leg 4 endopod small, less than half length of exopod; second endopodal segment of left leg 4 bearing small dentiform process at inner distal corner ( Fig. 37D View FIGURE 37 ), but same segment of right leg 4 bearing large distal process at outer distal corner ( Fig. 37E View FIGURE 37 ); terminal spine on distal endopodal segment naked, as long as distal segment. Armature formula for legs 1–4 as follows:

Coxa Basis Exopod Endopod

Leg 1: 0-1 1-0 I-0; I-1; III, I, 4 0-1; 0-1; I, 1, 4

Leg 2: 0-1 1-0 I-0; I-1; III, I, 5 0-1; 0-2; I, II, 3

Leg 3: 0-1 1-0 I-0; I-1; III, I, 5 0-1; 0-2; I, II, 2

Leg 4: 0-1 1-0 I-0; I-1; II, I, 5 0-1; 0, I, 0

Leg 5 consisting of dorsolateral seta on fifth pedigerous somite and free exopodal segment ( Fig. 37F View FIGURE 37 ) 1.45 times longer than wide (29×20 μm), narrowing distally, with convex outer margin; distally with 1 dentiform process, 1 spine (24 μm long) and 1 naked seta (26 μm long). Leg 6 ( Fig. 37G View FIGURE 37 ) represented by 2 setae and 2 denticles on genital operculum.

Male. Unknown.

Remarks. The asymmetry of leg 4 is unusual: in the left leg the second endopodal segment bears a small dentiform process at the inner distal corner whereas on the right leg this segment has a large process at the outer distal corner. The figured specimen may simply be aberrant but more material will be needed to confirm this.

MNHN

Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF