Sinocatops ruzickai, Wang & Zhou, 2016
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4085.3.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B20ED0F1-F82F-4912-9971-BB986D3C385D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6081344 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/406D773F-5435-0708-FF27-FAEEFD85FF40 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Sinocatops ruzickai |
status |
sp. nov. |
Sinocatops ruzickai View in CoL sp. nov.
( Figs. 1A, B View FIGURE 1 ; 2A, B; 3A–F; 4A; 5A; 6A–C; 7A; 8A; 9A; 10A–K; 11A–I)
Type material. Holotype: CHINA, Sichuan: ♂, Wolong, Wuyipeng, Erdaoping, 2945–3055 m, virgin fir forest, pitfall trap, 30.VII–15.VIII.2004, Xiao-Dong Yu leg. (IZ-CAS) . Paratypes: 5♂♂, 8♀♀, same data as holotype (IZ-CAS) ; 1♀, same data as holotype except: secondary birch forest, 29.IV–2.V.2004 (IZ-CAS) ; 1♂, same data as holotype except: secondary birch forest, 30.V–2.VI.2004 (IZ-CAS) ; 2♂♂, 10♀♀, same data as holotype except: secondary birch forest, 15–30.VI.2004 (IZ-CAS) ; 1♂, 1♀, same data as previous except: forest edge of virgin fir (IZ-CAS) ; 2♀♀, same data as holotype except: 2535 m, mixed forest, 29.VI–14.VII.2004 (IZ-CAS) ; 3♂♂, 14♀♀, same data as holotype except: 2580–3055 m, secondary birch forest, 29.VI–15.VII.2004 (IZ-CAS) ; 4♀♀, same data as previous except: virgin fir forest (IZ-CAS) ; 1♀, same data as holotype except: forest edge of virgin fir, 15– 30.VII.2004 (IZ-CAS) ; 1♀, same data as previous except: secondary birch forest (IZ-CAS) ; 1♂, same data as holotype except: 2600–2650 m, Rhododendron forest, 14–29.VIII.2004 (IZ-CAS) ; 1♀, same data as previous except: mixed forest (IZ-CAS) ; 2♀♀, same data as holotype except: 2710–3045 m, 14–30.VIII.2004 (IZ-CAS) ; 2♀♀, same data as holotype except: 30.VIII–15.IX.2004 (IZ-CAS).
Description. Male. EBL: 3.20 mm. Length of different body parts: HL: AL: PL: ELL = 0.54: 1.52: 0.82: 1.75 mm; width: HW: EW: PW: ELW = 0.71: 0.07: 1.15: 1.21 mm. Proportion of antennomeres from base to tip in µm (length × width): 166 × 72, 145 × 61, 134 × 64, 123 × 63, 112 × 69, 104 × 75, 127 × 90, 84 × 80, 112 × 105, 106 × 107, 186 × 98. (Measurements are mean values based on 5 specimens).
Sinocatops Rybinskiella $ ’! (!7 $,Ë +,. (! 7!0 $,Ë +,. (0 7!, $,Ë +,. 0
+ "Ë +,.! "Ë +,.!0 "Ë +,.!
&+" &" Ë. 0 /"# Ë.! /:# Ë. 1 /%#
. ’$ 5,Ë 5. ’ (5,Ë 5. ’ 5,Ë 5. / ’;:#;!:#;:#
/&’ ""’$ +! ((Ë (. ((Ë (. / ((Ë (.!
$ + +" "#:# %#
+ + + ’
%! <Ë (. 0 ’ <<Ë (. ’ <<Ë (. 1/’ <’ (((’ (((27 # ’ * =7># "7%#
. +?,Ë:?,.!?,Ë:?,.?,Ë:?,.
% +) @) @ 0:#) @ 0"# 0%#
" + (!A0’ ((’ (A ’ ((’ ((!A ’ ((’
() ’ () ’ () (1:# (’ () (1"# (1%#
……continued on the next page % (#
Sinocatops Rybinskiella S ruzickai R Sintania bodoana R. magnifica
% 1 2 $ + +) <"# (:#) <%#
! $ +" (
3444 )) ())>#!>#>#
%! + ") Ë. @) Ë. 01# Ë.! #) 0/#) ((()) (((B(* @ ((() @) (() *)) (<<* "# "#
* "#
4 +" +& (@ (@ ((; <@ *) (((* "7%# "7%# "7%#
3 344 (() /"#) 0"#
2#
3444 (; C C <(; C))
$# % D E /:# 0:#
3 3444 )) (* ((* () (((
((* *) #) /%# * 0%#
45 ((((() /2# (() 02#
) =#
3 +" &" ((># ((F; *; <() (
(0 #
/$#
/ "’ (= +# /2# (0 2 $# Habitus ( Fig. 1A View FIGURE 1 ; 2A) elongate and rather narrow, regularly convex and sublustrous; well pigmented: mostly dark brown; mouthparts, basal five antennomeres, protarsi, apical parts of meso- and metatarsi, and elytral apex somewhat paler. Dorsum continually clothed with fine, recumbent and sallow pubescence.
Head wider than long, HW/HL = 1.31. Surface covered with large, coarse and sparse punctures, separated about 2.0–4.0 times of their diameter, interspaces smooth. Clypeofrontal suture absent. Clypeus with straight anterior margin. Compound eye built from ca. 62–66 ommatidia, EW/HW = 0.10. Antennae ( Fig. 10A View FIGURE 10 ) long and slender, AL/HW = 2.13; all antennomeres longer than wide at different levels, except 8th and 10th almost as long as wide; 3rd slightly shorter than 2nd; 11th longest, elongated pear-shape. Cervical sclerite with length/width = 1.79 in medial view ( Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4 ).
Pronotum ( Fig. 10B View FIGURE 10 ) subcampanulate and transverse, widest around middle, PW/PL = 1.39. Sides regularly narrowed forward from widest and weakly constricted before hind corners. Hind corners rounded, protruding backward. Posterior margin bisinuate, emarginate behind hind corners. Surface covered with fine punctures, interspaces smooth, without depression in each latero-basal area.
Elytra oval, tightly fused with each other (can be separated with some strength), widest at about basal 2/7, ELL/EW = 1.44. Sides regularly curved, evenly narrowing from widest to apices; apices narrowly rounded ( Fig. 10G View FIGURE 10 ). Sutural striae absent. Surface covered with fine punctures, interspaces smooth. Metathoracic wings absent.
Prolegs slender, with basal three protarsomeres ( Fig. 10C View FIGURE 10 ) strongly expanded: TW/BTW = 1.12. Protibiae ( Fig. 10E View FIGURE 10 ) simply and gradually expanded towards apex. Profemora without tubercle on inner side. Mesotibiae with inner margin gently sinuate, 1 st mesotarsomere ( Fig. 7A View FIGURE 7 ) moderately expanded. Metatibiae straight.
Abdominal ventrite VIII ( Fig. 10I View FIGURE 10 ) with middle indentation at anterior edge, while elongated posteriorly and distinctly notched at posterior edge. Genital segment ( Fig. 10J View FIGURE 10 ) with short spiculum gastrale, not expanded dorsoventrally ( Fig. 10K View FIGURE 10 ); tergite IX rounded ventro-apically.
Aedeagus ( Fig. 11A, B View FIGURE 11 ) with median lobe long and moderately wide (length/width = 5.74), almost parallel below preapical part which inconspicuously expanded, then narrowed apically and terminated to a shortly round knob in dorsal view; parameres filiform, reached about apical 2/5 of median lobe, each with two apical setae; basal lama short; ventral operculum with two lobes rounded at apical edge. In lateral view, median lobe thick, substraight above curved base and abruptly flatted at apex ( Fig. 11C View FIGURE 11 ). Internal sac ( Fig. 11A–C View FIGURE 11 ) with a cluster of spines at median of apex, following two spine rows convergent apically and two rows of phanerae, and a pair of curved large teeth in basal region.
Female. Wider and chubbier than male in general appearance ( Fig. 1B View FIGURE 1 ; 2B), and also can be distinguished from following characteristics: pro- & mesotarsi simply linear ( Fig. 10D View FIGURE 10 ); protibiae ( Fig. 10F View FIGURE 10 ) narrower; elytral apices ( Fig. 10H View FIGURE 10 ) acuminated; ventrite VII ( Fig. 11D View FIGURE 11 ) with a small subtriangular tooth at middle of posterior edge; tergite VIII ( Fig. 11E View FIGURE 11 ) subtrapezoidal, sides gently curved, without well-defined desclerotized area; ventrite VIII ( Fig. 11F View FIGURE 11 ) shallowly emarginate at posterior edge, and spiculum ventrale relatively narrow; tergite IX ( Fig. 11G View FIGURE 11 ) rounded at posterior edge, with four strong setae and numerous other finer setae posteriorly; ventral sclerite ( Fig. 11I View FIGURE 11 ) slender and ligulate, without sensillae; valvifer ( Fig. 11G, H View FIGURE 11 ) with 1 lateral seta; coxite ( Fig. 11G, H View FIGURE 11 ) with 3 subapical, 1 lateral and 1 basolateral setae; stylus ( Fig. 11G, H View FIGURE 11 ) minute, cylindrical, with 1 long seta.
Etymology. The specific epithet is dedicated to Dr. Jan Růžička (Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic), a famous specialist on Agyrtidae , Silphidae and Leiodidae , for his kind help to our study. Distribution. China (Sichuan).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |