Sinetectula shepstonensis ( Tomlin, 1926 ) Fraussen & Vermeij, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2021.748.1351 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D5682561-AF13-475A-81DB-123686456C53 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4770804 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1A1A87A7-FFE7-8A3B-D7FB-FEF32D65FCFE |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Sinetectula shepstonensis ( Tomlin, 1926 ) |
status |
gen. et comb. nov. |
Sinetectula shepstonensis ( Tomlin, 1926) View in CoL gen. et comb. nov.
Figs 8 View Fig , 10S–T View Fig
Pollia shepstonensis Tomlin, 1926: 291 , pl. 16 fig. 4 (see Fig. 10S View Fig ).
Cantharus (Prodotia) shepstonensis – Cernohorsky 1975: 203, fig. 63.
Prodotia shepstonensis – Kilburn et al. 2010: 52, unnumbered fig.
Type locality
“Beach End near Port Shepstone”.
Material examined
Holotype
SOUTH AFRICA • 1 dd; Kwazulu-Natal Coast , Port Shepstone ; NHM (UK) 1926.12.6.6 (see Fig. 10T View Fig ).
Other material
OMAN • 3 lv; Mirbat ; depth 30 m; J. Rosado leg.; Nov. 2016; KF 8048 (see Fig. 8A–B View Fig ) .
SOMALIA • 1 dd; “Somalia”; KF 1627 • 2 dd; off Somalia, deep water; KF 2208 (see Fig. 8C–G View Fig ).
Distribution
Sinetectula shepstonensis gen. et comb. nov. is known from South Africa in the south, along Somalia to Oman in the north.
Remarks
Sinetectula shepstonensis gen. et comb. nov. shares all characteristics with S. cinis gen. et comb. nov., apart from the presence of a labral denticle. Specimens from deep water (see Fig. 9C–G View Fig ) are more slender, with a laterally more flattened spire very similar to S. cinis gen. et comb. nov.; shallow water specimens have slightly more convex whorls. One of the specimens has the apex in rather good condition without too much erosion and shows a conical, rather high, multispiral protoconch consisting of 3 whorls with a small tip.
Sinetectula cinis gen. et comb. nov. is almost identical in sculpture but differs from S. shepstonensis gen. et comb. nov. in its rougher sculptured edge of the outer lip with a labral denticle, the slightly stronger spiral sculpture in combination with much weaker secondary spiral cords, the laterally weakly flattened whorls (instead of convex), the slightly stretched base (instead of constricted) resulting in a slightly broader siphonal canal and a much darker colour.
Sinetectula nigricostata gen. et comb. nov. looks similar to but differs from S. shepstonensis gen. et comb. nov. in its slightly more convex whorls, the slightly finer spiral sculpture, the stronger axial ribs that are lower in number, the constricted base with longer siphonal canal and a much darker pattern consisting of fine spiral lines.
NHM |
United Kingdom, London, The Natural History Museum [formerly British Museum (Natural History)] |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Buccinoidea |
Family |
|
Genus |
Sinetectula shepstonensis ( Tomlin, 1926 )
Fraussen, Koen & Vermeij, Geerat J. 2021 |
Prodotia shepstonensis
Kilburn R. N. & Marais J. P. & Fraussen K. 2010: 52 |
Cantharus (Prodotia) shepstonensis
Cernohorsky W. O. 1975: 203 |
Pollia shepstonensis
Tomlin J. R. le 1926: 291 |