Scatophila hirsovae, Zatwarnicki & Kejval, 2025

Zatwarnicki, Tadeusz & Kejval, Zbyněk, 2025, A review of Palaearctic species of the contaminata group of Scatophila (Diptera: Ephydridae) with description of a new species, Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 65 (1), pp. 157-165 : 161-163

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.37520/aemnp.2025.012

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:03564920-D40B-4ED4-A32B-DD4FA91BA354

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17634693

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C51867-FFEC-B626-3331-2DC16419FB22

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Scatophila hirsovae
status

sp. nov.

Scatophila hirsovae sp. nov.

( Figs 13–20 View Figs 13–17 View Figs 18–20 )

Type locality. Czech Republic, Bohemia, Kateřina, Soos National Nature Reserve, saline swamp near Císařský spring, 50°8′53.8″N 12°24′10.8″E, altitude 440 m.

Type material. HOLOTYPE: ♂ (dissected), labelled: ʽCZ-Bocc 5840 , 5.7.2021, KATEŘINA, Soos Reserve, saline swamp near Císařský spring , pan traps, 440 m, Z. Kejval leg. 50°8′53.8″N 12°24′10.8″E [printed] // HOLOTYPE [red label, printed] // Scatophila hirsovae sp.nov. T. Zatwarnicki & Z. Kejval det. 2025 [printed]ʼ ( NMPC) GoogleMaps . PARATYPES: 1 ♂ 1 ♀, same labels as holotype ( NMPC) GoogleMaps ; 1 ♂ 1 ♀, ʽCZ-Bocc 5840 , 21.6.2023, KATEŘINA, Soos Reserve, salt marsh (partly trans.) swept , 440 m, Z. Kejval leg. 50°09′04″N 12°24′05″E [printed]ʼ ( NMPC) GoogleMaps ; 2 ♂♂, ʽCZ-Bocc 5548 , 12.8.2023 DOBROMĚŘICE, Dobroměřický ryb. (pond bottom) 195 m, Z. Kejval leg. 50°23′24″N 13°47′33″E [printed]ʼ ( NMPC) GoogleMaps ; 1 ♂ (dissected): ʽCS: Borský Jur, edge of pine wood , 48.36N / 17.03E, 190 m Barták, 22. vii. 1989 ʼ ( CULSP) GoogleMaps ; 1 ♀, ʽCZ: Chomutov, Libouš II jih nr brook , MT, 285m, 50°24′24″N, 13°23′21″E Barták, 5.vi.-17.vii. 1999 ʼ ( CULSP) GoogleMaps ; 2 ♀♀, ʽCZ: Duchcov- 2 km E deciduous wood, 18 [number in the circle, handwritten] 50.36N / 13.43E, 220 m., Bartak, 9.v.1993 ʼ ( CULSP) GoogleMaps ; 1 ♂, ʽSlovakia mer., Kamenín nr. Štúrovo, salty meadow , J. Roháček leg. // sweeping over boggy meadow, 31.V.1982 [printed, only date handwritten]ʼ ( SMOC) .

Other material examined. CZECH REPUBLIC: BOHEMIA: SE of Most, 50°28′01″N 13°40′16″E, alt. 250 m, mine dump, pond banks/sandy, 11.viii.2023, Z. Kejval leg., 1 ♂ without terminalia ( MCH). TURKEY: AYDIN: Çine, 8 km S, 37°32′34″N 28°03′46″E, alt. 68 m, river bank, swept, 29.iv.–1.v.2016, M. Barták & Š. Kubík leg., 1 ♂ ( CULSP).

Description. Small shore flies, male body length 1.02–1.37 mm; wing length 0.80–1.20; female body length 1.17–1.38, wing length 1.05–1.07.

Head. Frons almost 1.5× wider than long, parafrons grey with black lateral margins, mesofrons brownish-grey ( Figs 15–17 View Figs 13–17 ); the length of the inner vertical seta 1.5× of outer vertical seta, ocellar and fronto-orbital seta subequal in length of outer vertical seta ( Figs 15–17 View Figs 13–17 ); antenna black; face projected slightly, in 1/4 of eye width; face medially and ventrally brownish, antennal fovea and gena greyish; 3 strong submarginal setae and 2 midfacial setae, ventral one longer ( Figs 13, 16, 17 View Figs 13–17 ); palpus black; gena very short, gena-to-eye ratio 0.086 –0.140.

Thorax ( Figs 23–25 View Figs 21–25 ): Mesonotum ( Figs 24, 25 View Figs 21–25 ) mostly dark brown with seven small grey areas: one medial stripe between acrostichal setae, better expressed towards scutellum, and three on each side ( Figs 24, 25 View Figs 21–25 ): oval spot between acrostichal and dorsocentral setae, rounded spot between dorsocentral seta and presutural supra-alar seta, followed by a narrow, oval spot extending to posterior intra-alar seta; scutellum dark brown, with apex grey; central and ventral part of anepisternum, also ventral section of katepisternum dark brown, the rest of pleura grey ( Fig. 23 View Figs 21–25 ); presutural acrostichal setulae larger than others. Wing ( Fig. 21 View Figs 21–25 ) generally brown, infuscate with whitened spots; cell r 2+3 with three, basal radial cell and discal cell with one small, cell r 4+5 with three (basal small), m cell and cell cu A1 with two spots; costal vein ratio 0.28–0.41; M vein ratio 0.57–0.73; stem of halter whitish grey, knob of halter white. Legs uniformly black ( Fig. 23 View Figs 21–25 ).

Abdomen. Tergites dark brown, unicolorous, subshiny, with slight bluish-green reflection; male fifth to fourth tergite ratio 1.2. Male terminalia ( Figs 18–20 View Figs 18–20 ): epandrium in dorsal view ( Fig. 18 View Figs 18–20 ) 1.24 times as long as wide, posterior margin widely rounded, anterior margin broadly truncate (nearly straight) with rounded lateral margins; cercal opening comparatively large, height of cercal opening equal to 0.64 epandrial length; cerci in dorsal view ( Fig. 18 View Figs 18–20 ) moderate in size, hemispherical; postgonite in dorsal view irregularly deltoid with moderately broadened apically anterior process and small posteroventral projection ( Fig. 20 View Figs 18–20 ) and slightly arcuate; in lateral view irregularly trapezoid in arcuate form, anterior process apically bifurcate, bearing setulae, ventral process narrow, elongate ( Fig. 19 View Figs 18–20 ); neohypandrium in lateral view elongated, narrow, shallowly sinuous ( Fig. 19 View Figs 18–20 ); phallapodeme in dorsal view helmet-like with addition of T-shaped posterior crossbar (spatulate in antero-dorsal view), medial process linear, distinctly longer than expanded section ( Fig. 20 View Figs 18–20 ), in lateral view elongate, C-shaped with dorsal section narrowly elliptic, ventral process bar-like ( Fig. 19 View Figs 18–20 ); phallus (= aedeagus) in dorsal view elongated, 1.63 times as long as wide, ovoid with broadened anterior margin, dorsal opening pentagonal with broad V-shaped anterior margin ( Fig. 20 View Figs 18–20 ); in lateral view irregularly ampulliform with posterodorsal large circular indentation producing medial triangular projection, posterior margin moderately rounded, ventral margin straight, apically shallowly rounded ( Fig. 21 View Figs 21–25 ), ventral phallic process lacking.

Differential diagnosis. Scatophila hirsovae sp. nov. is undoubtedly close to S. pumilio , as suggested by overall similarity of external and genital characters. It can be distinguished from this species by the wing slightly pointed at apex of vein R 4+5, knob of halter white and characters of the male terminalia, especially by the helmet-like phallapodeme in dorsal view (see the key above).

The new species is similar to the Nearctic S. exilis , which can be separated by yellowish trochanters, apices of femora and two basal tarsomeres (versus black legs); anterior section of epandrium (in front of cercal opening) rectangular, 3× wider than long in the midlength (versus anterior section of epandrium trapezoidal, 2× wider than long in the midlength), epandrial anterior margin bears 30 sub- and marginal setae (versus epandrial anterior margin bears 16 sub- and marginal setae); postgonites separated medially (versus postgonites connected medially).

Etymology. The species is dedicated to Dr. Hana Kubátová-Hiršová (Kobylnice, Czech Republic) in recognition of her contribution to the knowledge of Ephydridae , especially to faunistics of Central European species. The species epithet, hirsovae , is derived from her maiden name.

Distribution. Palaearctic: Czech Republic ( Bohemia), Slovakia, Turkey ( Anatolia).

NMPC

National Museum Prague

SMOC

Slezske Muzeum Opava

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Ephydridae

Genus

Scatophila

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF