Salea jerdonii, Gray, 1846
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4563.3.9 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:16A92AEA-99BD-415A-8F4A-A9A73DEDFCA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5943010 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/194AA70F-FFD9-B451-38D8-FCB1ACA1F909 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Salea jerdonii |
status |
|
Systematic status of Salea jerdonii
Gray (1846) described Salea jerdonii based on two specimens sent in by T. C. Jerdon. Both specimens were males and therefore had the characteristic nuchal and dorsal crests which led Gray to think that these two specimens may represent two distinct species. Later, Günther (1864) realized that syntypes of S. jerdonii are actually males of S. horsfieldii and subsequently synonymized S. jerdonii . Other workers since (e.g. Boulenger 1885; Smith 1935) also considered S. jerdonii to be a synonym of S. horsfieldii following Günther. However, the original description was very short. Here we have presented the mensural and meristic data of the two syntypes—NHM 1946.8.14.13–14— in Table 2. These two specimens ( Figure 4 View FIGURE 4 ) do not differ from S. horsfieldii in body proportions and scalation data nor do they demonstrate any difference in qualitative characters. Although Gray (1946) stated “Madras” as the type locality, Jerdon (1853) himself stated that these lizards are found only in Nilgiri hills and Smith (1935) also restricted the type locality of S. jerdonii to the Nilgiri hills. Hence it can be seen that these two specimens actually originated from the geographic range of S. horsfieldii . Taking all of this into account we also regard S. jerdonii to be a subjective synonym of S. jerdonii , thus reconfirming the decision made by Günther (1864).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.