Rayforstia lordhowensis Rix & Harvey, 2010
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/zookeys.36.306 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:ADCACC88-6C78-4386-8E33-3F98234ECE92 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3789375 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F924C5AC-108D-4E75-AC69-8B1818440781 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:F924C5AC-108D-4E75-AC69-8B1818440781 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rayforstia lordhowensis Rix & Harvey |
status |
sp. nov. |
Rayforstia lordhowensis Rix & Harvey , sp. n.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:F924C5AC-108D-4E75-AC69-8B1818440781
Figs 87E View Figure 87 , 88–89 View Figure 88 View Figure 89 , 216
Type material. Holotype male: next to Soldier’s Creek , Lord Howe Island, New South Wales, Australia, litter, 31°34'55"S, 159°05'09"E, 8.VI.2003, I. Hutton, K. Lees ( AMS KS88916 ). GoogleMaps
Paratypes: Allotype female, Stephens Reserve , New Settlement, Lord Howe Island, New South Wales, Australia, pitfall trap, 31°31'33"S, 159°03'53"E, 4–14.XII.2000, AM team ( AMS KS76260 ) GoogleMaps .
Etymology. The specific epithet refers to the type locality of this species.
Diagnosis. Males of Rayforstia lordhowensis can be distinguished from all other described congeners except R. raveni by the absence of a dorsal scute ( Figs 88 View Figure 88 A–B); and from R. raveni by the shorter embolus and more symmetric, triangular conductor ( Fig. 89 View Figure 89 ). Females can be distinguished from all other described congeners by the tilted, globular morphology of the spermathecae ( Fig. 87E View Figure 87 ). Both sexes can also be recognised by the small body size and Lord Howe Island distribution (Fig. 216).
Description. Holotype male: Total length 0.68. Carapace 0.34 long, 0.27 wide. Abdomen 0.36 long, 0.25 wide. Leg I femur 0.25. Body colour very pale cream. Carapace raised anteriorly, not fused to sternum except around petiole; dorsal surface of pars cephalica slightly convex in lateral view. Eyes present on anterior margin of pars cephalica, but barely-visible due to faded colour of specimen. Chelicerae without bulging anterior projections; promargin with three peg teeth. Legs relatively short (leg I femur-carapace ratio 0.74); macrosetae absent. Abdomen oval, covered with hair-like setae; dorsal scute and lateral sclerotic strips absent. Pedipalpal patella with retrolaterally-directed, hooked lRPA and rounded, depressed distal region with ornate, ridged cuticular microstructure; tegulum smooth, with excavate ETR and triangular distal conductor; embolus long (length> 5× width), looping dorsal to conductor ( Fig. 89 View Figure 89 ).
Allotype female: Total length 0.86. Carapace 0.41 long, 0.31 wide. Abdomen 0.49 long, 0.37 wide. Leg I femur 0.28. Body colour very pale cream. Carapace raised anteriorly, not fused to sternum except around petiole; dorsal surface of pars cephalica slightly convex in lateral view. Eyes present on anterior margin of pars cephalica, but barely-visible due to faded colour of specimen. Chelicerae without bulging anterior projections; promargin without peg teeth. Legs relatively short (leg I femur-carapace ratio 0.68); macrosetae absent. Abdomen oval, covered with hair-like setae; dorsal scute and lateral sclerotic strips absent. Pedipalp entire, five-segmented. Epigyne with distinctive external morphology ( Fig. 88D View Figure 88 ); spermathecae globular, tilted mesally; insemination ducts looped; fertilisation ducts sinuous ( Fig. 87E View Figure 87 ).
Distribution. Known only from Lord Howe Island in the western Pacific Ocean, 780 km north-east of Sydney (Fig. 216).
Remarks. Rayforstia lordhowensis seems more similar to Australian species of Rayforstia than to New Zealand taxa, as evidenced by the absence of a dorsal scute on the male abdomen and the close similarity to R. raveni from eastern Australia. The species is found on both the north and mountainous south of Lord Howe Island ( Fig. 220 View Figure 220 ); the habitat at Stephens Reserve is lowland, subtropical rainforest dominated by Kentia palms ( Howea spp.) ( Fig. 220F View Figure 220 ). It is the smallest known species of Rayforstia .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |