Orphilinae

Zhou, Yu-Lingzi, Nicholls, James A., Liu, Zhen-Hua, Hartley, Diana & Szito, Andras, 2022, Molecular Phylogeny of Dermestidae (Coleoptera) Reveals the Polyphyletic Nature of Trogoderma Latreille and the Taxonomic Placement of the Khapra Beetle Trogoderma, Insect Systematics and Diversity 6 (6), pp. 1-24 : 11

Orphilinae Clade

In spite of their apparent morphological differences* the dorsalls glabrous & Fig. 1L ) and anthophilous adults of Holarctic Orphilus &Paulian 1942; Beal 1985b; Zhantiev 2000* 2001) and the densels setose and scavenging Oriental and Australian members of Ranolus Blair &1929) are recovered as sister groups* confirming the monophsls of this subfamils* previousls established on morphological characters alone &Lawrence and Ślipiński 2005). Adults of Orphilinae share a unique secondars articulation of procoxae with the prosternal process & Fig. 5F )* and a peculiar secondars articulation of the mesocoxae with the metaventrite &Lawrence and Ślipiński 2005). Orphiline larvae are well sclerotized and covered with simple setae* and have a well-developed mandibular mola and a concealed abdominal segment X & Beal 1985b * Zhantiev 2001* Lawrence and Ślipiński 2005). Larvae of Orphilus have been found in rotting wood feeding on fungal hsphae & Beal 1985b * Zhantiev 2001) while Ranolus larvae & Fig. 8L ) were sifted from rotten wood* litter* and bark and moss of a fallen tree; thes appear to be saprophagous &Lawrence and Ślipiński 2005).

Figures

Fig. 1. Diverkity of Dermektidae Latreille& 1804& adultk. %; & B) Thylodrias contractus Motkchulkcy: %;) female& %B) male; %C) Trinodes hirtus Fabriciuk; %D) Ctesias serra %Fabriciuk); %E) Anthrenus scrophulariae %Linnaeuk); %F) Eurhopalus vespulae %Beal); %G) Lanorus punctatus %Scopoli); %H) Thorictus kp. on itk ant hokt; %I) Dermestes maculatus De Geer; %J) Trogoderma versicolor %Creutzer); %K) Telopes fasciatus %Thunberg); %L) Orphilus subnitidus LeConte. Creditk:;& B – Matt Bertone;C – Pierre Grok; D – Chriktoph Benikch; E& F – Nicolai Vladimirov;G – Liboupat; H – Nicolak Komeza; I – Krikti Ellingken;J – Richard;K – LenWorthington; L – Joyce Grokk.

Fig. 5. Morphology of Dermektidae Latreille& 1804& adult prothorax ktructurek. %;) Telopes fasciatus %Thunberg); %B) Eurhopalus australis %Hope); %C) Anthrenus verbasci %Linnaeuk);%D) Eurhopalus kp.; %E) Dermestes maculatus De Geer; %F) Ranolus australis %Lawrence & Ślipińkci); %G) Trogoparvus kp.; %H) Evorinea kp.

Fig. 8. Morphology of Dermektidae Latreille& 1804& larval ktructurek. %; & B) pretarkuk; %C& F& J) abdominal kpiciketae and haktiketae; %D& E) antenna; %G& H) mandible; %I) abdominal ketae on tergum VI; %K) prothorax and head& lateral; %L) body in lateral akpect; %M) head& frontal view. %; & D) Trogoderma granarium Evertk; %B& E) Eurhopalus australis %Hope); %C) Trogoderma variabile Ballion; %F) Anthrenus verbasci %Linnaeuk)& abdominal kegmentk 5–7; %G& I & M) Attagenus brunneus Faldermann; %H) Dermestes maculatus De Geer; %J) Eurhopalus kp.& tergite VI; %K) Trichelodes kp.; %L) Ranolus kp.