Pseudoodes vicarius ( Bates, 1873 ) Guéorguiev & Liang, 2020

Guéorguiev, Borislav & Liang, Hongbin, 2020, Revision of the Palaearctic and Oriental representatives of Lachnocrepis LeConte and Oodes Bonelli (Coleoptera: Carabidae), with special account on Chinese species, Zootaxa 4850 (1), pp. 1-89 : 16-21

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4850.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:18AA0411-0E54-4922-84C7-608EAC68D281

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4479985

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BC5E5B-294F-FFAB-FF4B-F93CEE82FE98

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Pseudoodes vicarius ( Bates, 1873 )
status

comb. nov.

3. Pseudoodes vicarius ( Bates, 1873) View in CoL , comb. n.

( Figs 4 View FIGURE 4 A–G, Figs 5 View FIGURE 5 A–D, Table 2)

Oödes vicarius Bates, 1873: 254 View in CoL (type locality: ‘Hiogo’).

References.

Oodes vicarius: Chaudoir 1882: 361 View in CoL (taxonomic notes); Andrewes 1930: 239 (‘ Japan.’); Habu & Baba 1960: 33 (comparison with O. echigonus View in CoL ); Allen 1973: 32 (Arkansas Insect Collection); Lorenz 1998: 305; Bousquet 2003: 445; Lorenz 2005: 326; Hasegawa et al. 2015: 23 ( Japan, Aichi Prefecture); Bousquet 2017: 636.

Oodes (Oodes) vicarius: Jakobson 1906: 310 View in CoL (distribution); Csiki 1931: 1011 (‘Japan’); Habu 1956: 79–80 (identification keys), 85–87 (redescription); Habu 1958: 194 (distribution in Japan).

Type material. Oodes vicarius Bates : 1♂, 3♀♀ syntypes preserved in MNHN (ex-coll. H.W. Bates), labelled as follows, ♂: ‘Hiogo Japan [w, h; by H.W. Bates] // Oodes vicarius Bates [w, h; by H.W. Bates] // Ex-Musaeo H.W. Bates 1892 [w, p]’; 1♀: ‘HIOGO [w, p] // Ex-Musaeo H.W. Bates 1892 [w, p.]’; 2♀♀: ‘ Japan [w, h] // Ex-Musaeo H.W. Bates 1892 [w, p]’; ( MNHN, box ‘Magasins Chaudoir nr. 77 Anatrichis Oodiellus Systolocran. Polychaetus Oodes ’). Since no specimens were borrowed for examination after the visit of BG in MNHN, the lectotype designation for O. vicarius will be made in a future publication.

Incorrectly designated type material. Oodes vicarius Bates : 1♂, designated as holotype, ‘Type H.T. [white rounded label with red band, p] // Kioto. 2.VII.–4.VII.81. [w, p] // Japan. G. Lewis. 1910–320. [w, p] // Oodes vicarius Bates [w, h]’ (BMNH); 1♂, designated as paratype, ‘ Japan. G. Lewis. 1910–320. [w, p] // Co-type [white label with green band, p] // Ex coll. Brit. Mus [w, p] // O. vicarius B. [w, h] // H.E.Andrewes Coll. B.M.1945–97. [w, p]’ (BMNH).

Andrewes (1919: 196–197) stated that “ The types of the “new genera and species of Geodephagous Coleoptera from China [sic: the correct word is Japan, not China]” described by Bates in Trans. Ent. Soc. London 1873 are not in the British Museum”. The study of the labels of the last specimens collected by Georges Lewis showed that: (1) one of them was collected in 1881, while the description was published in 1873; (2) the locality does not match the type locality indicated in Bates (1873).

Topotype material. JAPAN: Hyôgo Prefecture: 1♂, ‘Fukuzumi Hyogo Japan 11. IX. 1994 N. Ito leg.’ ( NMNHS).

Other material examined. JAPAN: Ishikawa Prefecture: 1♂, 3♀♀, ‘Tomurobessyo [Tomurobessho] Kanazawashi Ishikawa pref. // 20–VIII–2006 N. Ueda leg.’( NMNHS). Saitama Prefecture: 1♂, 1♀, ‘Yagyi [=Yagyû], Rishima Saitama’ ( MNHN, box ‘Museum National Collection Negre Harpalidae (Magasin) ’). Chiba Prefecture: 3♂♂, 2♀♀, ‘Ojyaga-ike Chiba Pref. 16.V.2016 S. Morita leg.’ ( NMNHS). Kyoto Prefecture: 1♂, ‘Japan, Kyoto 25.IX.1908 leg. H. Sauter’ ( NMNHS).

Additional material seen (precise data were not taken). Thirteen specimens from Japan (MFNB, box nr. Oodini I).

TME: 32 specimens. TGE: 2♂♂, 1♀.

Diagnosis. Morphologically very close to P. cribristernis in a set of external and genitalia characters, but differentiated by its: (1) mentum tooth emarginate apically; (2) prosternal process rounded; (3) metepisternum with lateral margin slightly convex; its coadunation with epipleuron located more medially; (4) apical lamella of median lobe stouter and bent to left; (5) apical gonocoxite subelongate, with nematiform setae closer to apex; and (6) spermathecal gland attached to receptaculum medially. Differs from P. subcoriaceus in its smaller size, less than 14.5 mm.

Description. Habitus. Specimens of middle to large size (BL: 12.8–14.2 mm, BW: 5.0– 5.6 mm), with subelongate and subconvex body ( Figs 4A, C View FIGURE 4 ). Ratios and measurements. See Table 2. Color and luster. Body black, appendages piceous. Integument less shiny dorsally than in P. cribristernis , without iridescence. Punctuation. Dorsal surface without punctuation; prosternum and metasternum at sides, mesoepisternum and metepisternum more densely and strongly punctate than proepisternum; abdominal ventrites as in P. cribristernis . Head. About half as wide as pronotum ( Table 2). Mentum tooth more or less emarginate at apex, with distinct paramedial border ( Figs 4D, E View FIGURE 4 ). Thorax. Pronotum with sides slightly rounded toward posterior angles (PW/PB: 1.05–1.09); maximum width in posterior third; laterobasal impressions indistinct; base feebly sinuate; anterior angles rounded, slightly projected. Prosternum with median longitudinal sulcus indistinct; prosternal process ovate, with apex rounded ( Fig. 4F View FIGURE 4 ). Metepisternum longer than wide (MA/MM: 0.94–0.96), with lateral margin straight to slightly convex, coadunation with epipleuron short, located in anterior half, more medially than in P. cribristernis ( Fig. 4G View FIGURE 4 ). Elytra. Apical sinuation weaker than in P. cribristernis . Basal margin distinct laterally, forming a small denticle at shoulder, disappearing medially at level between striae 2 and 3. Parascutellar striola distinct, punctate, less impressed than other striae; striae punctate at least anteriorly (contrary to P. cribristernis ). Intervals 1–7 flat to subconvex, interval 8 more convex than others. Legs. Metacoxal basal sulcus reaching lateral fourth. Male mesotibia slightly dilated, with a swelling in apical two-thirds. Protarsomeres 1–3 of male ( Fig. 4B View FIGURE 4 ) moderately dilated, with second tarsomere wider than long (W/Lp2: 1.17–1.24). Male genitalia. Median lobe ( Figs 5A, B View FIGURE 5 ) with basal bulb short, wide; angle between basal bulb and shaft obtuse; shaft long, swollen proximally; apex short, curved ventrally; apical lamella short, rounded, with right margin curved to left. Female genitalia. Basal gonocoxite with four or five lateroapical setae. Apical gonocoxite elongate, with two large dorsolateral ensiform setae, dorsomedial ensiform seta near base, and nematiform setae at apex ( Fig. 5C View FIGURE 5 ). Bursa copulatrix with a dorsal sclerite smaller than in P. cribristernis ( Fig. 5D View FIGURE 5 ); spermatheca moderately long, well differentiated, with receptaculum twisted apically; spermathecal gland connected near apical fifth of seminal canal.

Distribution. Palaearctic Region: Japan (Honshu, Kyushu).

Bionomics. According to Habu (1956), the species is not abundant and found near the margin of ponds, but not near paddy fields. Seiji Morita stated (pers. comm.): “In Japan both species [ O. echigonus and O. vicarius ] live in the margin of ponds, not rivers, so rather rare.”.

MNHN

Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Carabidae

Genus

Pseudoodes

Loc

Pseudoodes vicarius ( Bates, 1873 )

Guéorguiev, Borislav & Liang, Hongbin 2020
2020
Loc

O. echigonus

Habu & Baba 1960
1960
Loc

Oodes (Oodes) vicarius:

Jakobson 1906: 310
1906
Loc

Oodes vicarius:

Chaudoir 1882: 361
1882
Loc

Oödes vicarius

Bates 1873: 254
1873
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF