Pseudochoutagus curvativus, Che, Yanli, Zhang, Yalin & Wang, Yinglun, 2011
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.204450 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6191234 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1E390955-FFE8-1173-9D87-FB1AFEA235BD |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pseudochoutagus curvativus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Pseudochoutagus curvativus View in CoL sp. nov.
Figs. 1–3 View FIGURES 1 – 7 , 8–17 View FIGURES 8 – 17 .
Description. Length, male (including tegmen): 10.4 mm, length of tegmen: 6.9 mm; female (including tegmen): 11.3 mm, length of tegmen: 7.2 mm.
General color in fresh specimens brown suffused with testaceous (older specimens pale yellow) ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Vertex brown with testaceous spots. Eyes dark brown. Frons brown with apex dark brown ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Pronotum and mesoscutellum brown with some testaceous maculae on disc ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Tegmen brown with veins testaceous ( Figs 1, 3 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ); wing dark brown ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Legs brown, hind femora and base of hind tibia dark brown ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Abdomen brown with disc dark brown, apex reddish-brown.
Head very long, tapering to apex; apex of vertex upturned in lateral view ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Vertex more or less triangular with median carina, narrow with disc slightly convex, 3.3× longer in midline than width at apex ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Frons smooth, with median carina apparent only along one third of midline; disc elevated, widest near eyes, 1.8× wider at widest part than at base, and midlength 2.9× longer than greatest width ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Frontoclypeal suture arched ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Clypeus small with median carina; clypeus and the base of frons at same plane in lateral view ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Pedicel of antenna large and nearly tubular, with many scattered sensilla ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 8 – 17 ). Pronotum wide with anterior margin distinctly convex and hind margin nearly straight, disc with many irregular pale ivory tubercles ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Mesoscutellum nearly triangular, disc with two dark spots, 1.9× wider at widest part than medial length ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Tegmen nearly elliptical; veins elevated, longitudinal veins with many short cross veins, 2.4× longer than widest part; Sc long, reaching past the middle, M2 branched, Cu not forked, an extra vein arising after apex of clavus nearly parallel to Cu ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1 – 7 , 9 View FIGURES 8 – 17 ). Wing large with two lobes, veins reticulate, 0.95× length of tegmen ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 8 – 17 ). Hind tibia with two lateral teeth near apex ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Spinal formula of hind leg 7–11–2.
Male genitalia: Anal segment moderately large, mushroom-shaped, longer than medial width in dorsal view ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 8 – 17 ); lateral margin strongly convex, apical margin slightly concave with angles obtuse; ventral margin a little convex in lateral view ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 8 – 17 ). Anal tube situated basally ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 8 – 17 ). Pygofer slightly longer ventrally than dorsally in profile; dorsocaudal angle distinctly produced and tapered basally ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 8 – 17 ). Connective fused with aedeagus. Aedeagus curved downward medially near apex ( Figs 13, 14 View FIGURES 8 – 17 ). Aedeagus somewhat U-shaped, symmetrical, with two moderately long, spiniform processes and lateral, ventral and dorsal lobes ( Figs 13, 14 View FIGURES 8 – 17 ); dorsal lobe bifurcate with apical margin rounded, convex in middle in dorsal view, apex tapering, enveloping lateral lobes and ventral lobe downwards; lateral lobes branched with apex slender and obtuse in lateral view ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 8 – 17 ); ventral lobe not divided, apical margin a little concave, apex obtuse in ventral view ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 8 – 17 ). Genital styles moderately long with process in lateral view; apex of process tapering and hooked ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 8 – 17 ).
Female genitalia: Anal segment in dorsal view ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 8 – 17 ) distinctly longer than maximum width, with lateral margins nearly straight, and apical margin convex; in lateral view ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 8 – 17 ) relatively narrow basally with apex slightly curved downward and rounded, dorsal margin sinuate; apex rounded with ventral margin nearly straight. Ovipositor ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 8 – 17 ) with first valvula curved dorsally, with three nearly parallel teeth. Third valvula stout, strongly convex, nearly triangular, with apical margin tumid and polished. Pregenital sternite with apical margin distinctly convex ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 8 – 17 ).
Material examined. Holotype 3 ( NWAFU), China, Hainan Prov., Mt. Jianfengling, 20 April 1983, coll. Gu Maobin.
Paratypes: 13 ( NWAFU), China, Hainan Prov., Mt. Tongguling, 26 April 2008, coll. Men Qiulei; 1Ƥ (SWU), Hainan Prov., Qiongzhong County, Fushan, 31 July 2007, coll. Wu Xiaofan.
Remarks. This species superficially resembles Choutagus longicephalus Zhang, Wang and Che, 2006 ( Figs 4– 7 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ) (Hemisphaeriinae), but can be distinguished from the latter by: 1) tegmen with claval suture; 2) the wing is bisected into two lobes; 3) the apex of vertex upcurved in lateral view; 4) vertex, frons and clypeus without lateral carinae, and pronotum and mesoscutellum without median or lateral carinae.
Pseudochoutagus curvativus View in CoL sp. nov. is related to Thabena retracta ( Walker, 1857) (Issini) View in CoL , but the main differences are: 1) vertex with apex upcurved in lateral view (nearly horizontal in Thabena retracta View in CoL ); 2) disc of pronotum with many irregular pale ivory tubercles (without tubercles in Thabena retracta View in CoL ); 3) spiniform processes of aedeagus smooth and not bearing denticles on external margins (bearing denticles in Thabena retracta View in CoL ).
Pseudochoutagus curvativus View in CoL sp. nov. is also closely related to Mycterodus cuniceps Melichar, 1906 (Issini) View in CoL based on the long vertex. It differs from Mycterodus cuniceps View in CoL in the following: 1) vertex 3.3× longer in midline than width at apex and not wrinkled transversely (3× longer in midline than width at apex and wrinkled transversely in Mycterodus cuniceps View in CoL ); 2) with hind wing ( Mycterodus cuniceps View in CoL lacking hind wing); 3) pronotum without central carination (present in Mycterodus cuniceps View in CoL ).
Etymology. The specific epithet is derived from Latin “ curvativus ”, referring to the apex of vertex upcurved in lateral view.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pseudochoutagus curvativus
Che, Yanli, Zhang, Yalin & Wang, Yinglun 2011 |
Mycterodus cuniceps
Melichar 1906 |
Thabena retracta (
Walker 1857 |