Procloeon (Securiops) falcatum ( Crass 1947 ) Kluge, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5343.3.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BB852CA9-6C6E-4016-9972-AAF2C378E41F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8334191 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A487CE-FFE1-FFC8-85A5-55316802F8D9 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Procloeon (Securiops) falcatum ( Crass 1947 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Procloeon (Securiops) falcatum ( Crass 1947) comb. n.
( Figs 1–7 View FIGURES 1–24 , 25–65 View FIGURES 25–30 View FIGURES 31–39 View FIGURES 40–46 View FIGURES 47–52 View FIGURES 53–58 View FIGURES 59–65 )
Centroptilum falcatum Crass 1947: 80 (J & ♀ imago).
Afroptilum (Afroptilum) falcatum: Gillies 1990: 99 .
Cheleocloeon falcatum: Lugo-Ortiz & McCafferty 1998: 379 View in CoL .
Potamocloeon macafertiorum: Jacobus & McCafferty 2005: 474 (larva, partim).
Material examined. SOUTH AFRICA, Western Cape Province: Cape Winelands District, Jonkershoek Valley, Eerste River upstream Stellenbosch , Swiss Club (5 km SE Stellenbosch), 33°57′30″S, 18°55′E, 18–22.I and 8– 12.II.2019, coll. N. Kluge & L. Sheyko: 1 L-SJ, 1 L/SJ, 2 larvae; GoogleMaps the same locality and collectors, 8–11.II.2019: 2 larvae GoogleMaps .
Descriptions
Larva. CUTICULAR COLORATION. Cuticle of anterior part of head nearly colorless, occipit light brownish. Pronotum, mesonotum and metanotum with composite pattern of colorless, light brown and dark brown areas ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 25–30 ). Fore protopteron with colorless base and dark brown striation on convex veins iRSa, iRSa 2, iRS and on distal portions of convex veins MA 2 and iMP ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 25–30 ). Hind protopteron brown basally, colorless at most part ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 25–30 ). Mesothoracic and metathoracic pleura brown ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 25–30 ), prothoracic pleura and all thoracic sterna colorless. Legs mostly colorless, with brownish darkening in distal part of femur, proximal part of tibia and distal part of tarsus ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 25–30 ). Abdominal terga with composite pattern of colorless, light brown and dark brown areas, with brown coloration most expressed on tergum VI ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 25–30 ); terga IV and VII without medial longitudinal stripe (in contrast to P. (S.) macafertiorum ). Abdominal sterna either nearly entirely colorless, or with contrasting brown longitudinal sublateral stripes ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 25–30 ). Caudalii nearly colorless, with brown bands on each 4th segment (as in Fig. 66 View FIGURES 66–69 ).
HYPODERMAL COLORATION. Not expressed; shortly before molt to subimago, subimaginal coloration becomes visible through larval cuticle (as in Figs 59–63 View FIGURES 59–65 ).
SHAPE AND SETATION. Mouthparts characteristic for Securiops (see above) ( Figs 31–46 View FIGURES 31–39 View FIGURES 40–46 ). Paraglossae nearly oval, with inner margin either evenly convex ( Figs 42–43 View FIGURES 40–46 ), or slightly concave in distal half (left side on Fig. 41 View FIGURES 40–46 ). On dorsal side of glossae, cuticle with transverse light brown sclerite just proximad of transverse setal row ( Fig. 46 View FIGURES 40–46 ); remainder cuticle of labium colorless. Distal segment of labial palp without row of stout setae, with several stout setae near outer-distal and inner-distal corners ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 40–46 ).
Legs ( Figs 47–50 View FIGURES 47–52 ): Femur, tibia and tarsus with rather small, stout, pointed, spine-like setae. On femur, all these spine-like setae equally small, located mostly on outer and inner sides not forming regular rows ( Fig. 47 View FIGURES 47–52 ). On tibia and tarsus, these spine-like setae irregularly dispersed on all sides ( Fig. 49 View FIGURES 47–52 ); only in distal part of tarsus forming rather regular longitudinal row. Claws characteristic for Securiops (see above) ( Fig. 50 View FIGURES 47–52 ).
Lateral spines present on abdominal segments IV–IX, varying from 2 to 8 spines on one side ( Figs 25–26 View FIGURES 25–30 ). Small posterolateral spines present on segments II–VII.
Posterior margin of abdominal tergum I smooth, without denticles; posterior margins of terga II–X with heavily sclerotized, conic, sharply pointed, spine-like denticles separated by spaces wider than denticle width ( Figs 51–56 View FIGURES 47–52 View FIGURES 53–58 ); on tergum IX row of denticles interrupted medially, behind pair of submedian setae ( Figs 51 View FIGURES 47–52 , 56 View FIGURES 53–58 ); projected portion of tergum X row with pair of larger denticles by sides and straight row of smaller denticles between them ( Figs 51–52 View FIGURES 47–52 ).
Posterior margins of abdominal sterna I–III smooth, without denticles; posterior margins of sterna IV–IX with spine-like pointed denticles, smaller and denser than denticles on terga ( Fig. 57 View FIGURES 53–58 ). Paraproct with spine-like denticles larger than denticles on sterna ( Fig. 52 View FIGURES 47–52 ).
Abdominal terga, sterna and paraprocts with oval scales in wide semilunar non-opercula-bearing sockets. Terga I–II without scales, with numerous small, pointed denticles ( Fig. 53 View FIGURES 53–58 ); tergum III with few scales and many denticles ( Fig. 54 View FIGURES 53–58 ); terga IV–X with numerous scales and less prominent denticles or with blunt transverse ridges instead of denticles ( Figs 55–56 View FIGURES 53–58 ). Sterna I–III without scales; sternum IV with few scales; sterna V–IX with numerous scales ( Fig. 57 View FIGURES 53–58 ).
Besides scales, abdominal terga and sterna with ring-like sensilla and fine setae. Fine setae vary from simple to bifid, from small to long, located sparsely and irregularly, not forming regular rows; each tergum VII–IX and sternum II–VIII with pair of long, bifurcate setae ( Fig. 58 View FIGURES 53–58 ).
Tergalii without denticles on costal ribs; dorsal lamella roundish, present on tergalii I–VI and absent on tergalius VII. Tergalius I shorter than others, widened, with anal margin sharply convex and costal margin concave ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–24 ). Tergalii II–VI gradually changing from this shape to oval shape of tergalius VI ( Figs 2–6 View FIGURES 1–24 ). Tergalius VII with costal margin sharply convex ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1–24 ).
Caudalii characteristic for Procloeon /g1 and Cloeon /fg1 (see above). Spines on lateral side of cercus gradually change from shorter in proximal part of cercus to longer in its distal part; in distal part of cercus, spine on lateral side of each segment twice longer than next segment (as in Figs 71–72 View FIGURES 70–76 ).
Subimago. CUTICULAR COLORATION. Cuticle of thorax mostly colorless, only selected areas of mesonotum and thoracic pleura contrastingly dark brown (as in Figs 84–85 View FIGURES 77–87 ).
TEXTURE. On legs of all pairs, all tarsal segments covered with pointed microlepides (as in Figs 71–72 View FIGURES 70–76 ).
Imago, male. Not examined; described by Crass (1947). Judging by hypodermal coloration of the male subimago reared from larva, and by subimaginal tissues in the mature male larva, fore femur has brown spot at proximal part ( Fig. 63 View FIGURES 59–65 ) and abdominal terga have variable brown markings, most extensive either on tergum IV ( Fig. 61 View FIGURES 59–65 ), or on terga IV and VII ( Fig. 59 View FIGURES 59–65 ). Hind wing with hooked costal process and with two veins ( Fig. 64 View FIGURES 59–65 ), wider than in P. (S.) macafertiorum . Middle and hind legs with tarsus longer than tibia, with two apical spines on initial 2nd and 3rd tarsomeres (actual 1st and 2nd tarsomeres) (as in Fig. 87 View FIGURES 77–87 ). Judging by subimaginal genitalia, penial bridge forms wide, semicircular projection ( Fig. 62 View FIGURES 59–65 ).
Imago, female. Undescribed; reported by Crass (1947).
Egg. Unknown.
Dimension. Specimen examined with fore wing length 5.5 mm; according to Crass (1947), fore wing length 6–8.5 mm.
Notes. Originally ( Crass 1947), the species under the name Centroptilum falcatum was described based on imagines collected in South Africa. Lugo-Ortiz & McCafferty (1998) placed falcatum [ Centroptilum ] in the genus Cheleocloeon Wuillot & Gillies 1993 , because they regarded its imago to be similar to another South-African species, which was originally described under the name Centroptilum excisum Barnard 1932 and currently placed in the genus Cheleocloeon . They wrote: ́The only difference between the two species is the presence of hind wings in female adults of C. falcatum ». Actually, male imagines of these species well differ one from another by genital structure. Till now, genitalia of Cheleocloeon excisum have not been described, but our material (imagines reared from larvae in South Africa) reveals that they have a structure typical for Cheleocloeon , with hook-like movable gonovectes and non-sclerotized penial bridge ( Kluge 2016a) ( Fig. 145 View FIGURES 143–145 ). In contrast to this, genitalia of falcatum [ Centroptilum ] were originally figured as having prominent semicircular penial bridge ( Fig. 65 View FIGURES 59–65 ; Crass 1947: fig. 20b), which is characteristic for Cloeon /g1, but not for Cheleocloeon . Judging by this figure, genitalia of falcatum [ Centroptilum ] are similar to P. (S.) macafertiorum : both have unistyligers widely separated and gradually narrowing distally ( Fig. 90 View FIGURES 88–91 ), while in Cheleocloeon excisum unistyligers are brought together, and articulation of the gonostylus with the unistyliger has composite structure ( Fig. 145 View FIGURES 143–145 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Securiops |
Procloeon (Securiops) falcatum ( Crass 1947 )
Kluge, Nikita J. 2023 |
Potamocloeon macafertiorum: Jacobus & McCafferty 2005: 474
Jacobus, L. M. & McCafferty, W. P. 2005: 474 |
Cheleocloeon falcatum:
Lugo-Ortiz, C. R. & McCafferty, W. P. 1998: 379 |
Centroptilum falcatum
Crass 1947: 80 |