Pinnotheres hickmani ( Guiler, 1950 )

Ahyong, Shane T. & Brown, Diane E., 2003, Description of Durckheimia lochi n. sp., with an annotated checklist of Australian Pinnotheridae (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura), Zootaxa 254, pp. 1-20 : 13-14

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.156571

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6276468

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B887F5-FF8E-FFD5-5975-FC86EEEA9F0A

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Pinnotheres hickmani ( Guiler, 1950 )
status

 

Pinnotheres hickmani ( Guiler, 1950) View in CoL

Fabia hickmani Guiler, 1950: 67 View in CoL –72, figs. 1–4 [type locality: Derwent River, Tasmania]. — Guiler, 1952: 40. — Schmitt et al., 1973: 24.

Pinnixa faba View in CoL . — Thomson, 1893: 49. — Guiler, 1952: 40. [Not Pinnixa faba (Dana, 1851) View in CoL ].

Pinnoteres pisum . — Fulton & Grant, 1906: 18. [Not P. p i s u m (Linnaeus, 1767)].

Pinnotheres pisum View in CoL . — Wellington & Hiscock, 1969: 333. — Griffin & Yaldwyn, 1971: 57 –58. [Not P. p i s u m (Linnaeus, 1767)].

Pinnotheres novaezelandiae View in CoL . — Rathbun, 1923: 98. [Not P. novaezelandiae Filhol, 1885 View in CoL a].

Pinnotheres novae ­zealandiae. — Guiler, 1952: 40; 1956: 7 [not P. novaezelandiae Filhol, 1885 View in CoL a].

Pinnotheres hickmani View in CoL . — Pregenzer, 1978: 127 –139; 1979a: 22–29, figs. 1, 2, 5–6, 8, 11, 13–16, 17, 19, 19A, 21–23, 29; 1979b: 547–550. — Page, 1983: 156. — Phillips et al., 1984: 116. — Jones, 1990: 202. — Davie, 2002: 433.

Material. TAS: AM E5676, 1 female (cw 8.5 mm, cl 8.4 mm), E coast of Flinders Id., Bass Strait, 40°01’S, 148°02’E, FIS Endeavour, 1909–1914. VIC: AM P15608, 5 females (cw 5.6–9.2 mm, cl 5.3–8.8 mm), Port Phillip, 37°58’S, 144°54’E, 12 m, from Mytilus sp., I. Hiscock, 1967. NSW: AM P10094, 1 female (cw 9.4 mm, cl 9.0 mm), Sow & Pigs Shoal, Port Jackson, 33°50.3’S, 151°16.2’E, from ‘large black mussel’, L. Comtesse, May 1930; AM P5500, 1 male (cw 6.2 mm, cl 6.2 mm), near Cape Hawke, 32°13’S, 152°34’E, from pippi, J. Kinghorn; AM P4870, 1 male (cw 2.7 mm, cl 2.6 mm), 4 females (cw 6.2– 8.8 mm, cl 5.7–8.1 mm), Port Stephens, from Donax between mantle and gills, 152°06’E, E. Briggs, Sep 1919; AM P11481, 1 male (cw 4.7mm, cl 4.4 mm), 6 females (cw 5.3–8.5 mm, cl 4.6–7.3 mm), Brunswick Heads, 28°32’S, 153°33’E, from pippi, C. Chadwick; AM P4003, 10 females (cw 8.3–10.0 mm, cl 7.7–8.4 mm), S of Tweed Heads, 28°10’S, 153°33’E, from Donax deltoides on sandy beach, J. Campbell. QLD: AM P2217, 2 females (cw 8.7–10.0 mm, cl 7.4–7.8 mm), Mud Id., Moreton Bay, 27°20’S, 153°15’E, A. McCulloch.

Australian localities. Moreton Bay, southern Queensland to Victoria, Tasmania, South Australia, to Shark Bay, Western Australia.

Australian hosts. Bivalve molluscs. Mytilus sp., Eumarcia fumigata (Sowerby, 1853) , Modiolus sp. (all Mytilidae ) ( Griffin & Yaldwyn 1971, Pregenzer 1978). Neotrigonia margaritacea (Lamarck, 1804) (Trigoniidae) ( Wellington & Hiscock 1969). Donax deltoides Lamarck, 1818 (Donacidae) (this study).

Remarks. Davie (2002) noted that Rathbun’s (1923) record of Pinnotheres novaezelandiae (Filhol) from Bass Strait required verification. According to previous authors, Rathbun’s (1923) specimen was neither referable to P. novaezelandiae (fide Scott 1961), nor P. hickmani (as P. p i s u m) (see Griffin & Yaldwyn 1971). According to Griffin & Yaldwyn (1971), Rathbun’s (1923) specimen could not be identified with P. hickmani (as P. pisum ) because of the presence of a lateral extension of the orbits as indicated by the shallow groove adjacent to the eyes, a feature absent from P. hickmani . Griffin & Yaldwyn (1971) also noted the presence of a fringe of dactylar setae on the ambulatory limbs in Rathbun’s (1923) specimen but not P. hickmani (as P. p i s u m). Rathbun’s (1923) specimen (AM E5676), some of Griffin & Yaldwyn’s study material and other specimens in the Australian Museum were re­examined for this study. Rathbun’s (1923) record of P. novaezelandiae is based on P. hickmani . The groove lateral to the eyes in Rathbun’s (1923) specimen is an artefact of damage from overall dorsal compression to the specimen. The setation of the dactyli of the ambulatory limbs is similar in all specimens, but could appear absent if specimens were examined ‘dry’ instead of submerged in fluid. Therefore, we conclude that Pinnotheres novaezelandiae is currently not known from Australia.

As remarked under the account of Orthotheres haliotidis , Thomson’s (1893) report of Pinnixia faba from Tasmania, followed by Guiler (1952), is probably based on Pinnotheres hickmani , the common Tasmanian species.

Distribution. Shark Bay, Western Australia, Victoria, Tasmania ( Jones 1990), and now from New South Wales and southern Queensland.

NSW

Royal Botanic Gardens, National Herbarium of New South Wales

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Malacostraca

Order

Decapoda

InfraOrder

Brachyura

Family

Pinnotheridae

SubFamily

Pinnotherinae

Genus

Pinnotheres

Loc

Pinnotheres hickmani ( Guiler, 1950 )

Ahyong, Shane T. & Brown, Diane E. 2003
2003
Loc

Pinnotheres hickmani

Davie 2002: 433
Jones 1990: 202
Phillips 1984: 116
Page 1983: 156
Pregenzer 1978: 127
1978
Loc

Pinnotheres pisum

Griffin 1971: 57
Wellington 1969: 333
1969
Loc

Pinnotheres novae

Guiler 1952: 40
1952
Loc

Fabia hickmani

Schmitt 1973: 24
Guiler 1952: 40
Guiler 1950: 67
1950
Loc

Pinnotheres novaezelandiae

Rathbun 1923: 98
1923
Loc

Pinnoteres pisum

Fulton 1906: 18
1906
Loc

Pinnixa faba

Guiler 1952: 40
Thomson 1893: 49
1893
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF