Pinnotheres hickmani ( Guiler, 1950 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.156571 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6276468 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B887F5-FF8E-FFD5-5975-FC86EEEA9F0A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pinnotheres hickmani ( Guiler, 1950 ) |
status |
|
Pinnotheres hickmani ( Guiler, 1950) View in CoL
Fabia hickmani Guiler, 1950: 67 View in CoL –72, figs. 1–4 [type locality: Derwent River, Tasmania]. — Guiler, 1952: 40. — Schmitt et al., 1973: 24.
Pinnixa faba View in CoL . — Thomson, 1893: 49. — Guiler, 1952: 40. [Not Pinnixa faba (Dana, 1851) View in CoL ].
Pinnoteres pisum . — Fulton & Grant, 1906: 18. [Not P. p i s u m (Linnaeus, 1767)].
Pinnotheres pisum View in CoL . — Wellington & Hiscock, 1969: 333. — Griffin & Yaldwyn, 1971: 57 –58. [Not P. p i s u m (Linnaeus, 1767)].
Pinnotheres novaezelandiae View in CoL . — Rathbun, 1923: 98. [Not P. novaezelandiae Filhol, 1885 View in CoL a].
Pinnotheres novae zealandiae. — Guiler, 1952: 40; 1956: 7 [not P. novaezelandiae Filhol, 1885 View in CoL a].
Pinnotheres hickmani View in CoL . — Pregenzer, 1978: 127 –139; 1979a: 22–29, figs. 1, 2, 5–6, 8, 11, 13–16, 17, 19, 19A, 21–23, 29; 1979b: 547–550. — Page, 1983: 156. — Phillips et al., 1984: 116. — Jones, 1990: 202. — Davie, 2002: 433.
Material. TAS: AM E5676, 1 female (cw 8.5 mm, cl 8.4 mm), E coast of Flinders Id., Bass Strait, 40°01’S, 148°02’E, FIS Endeavour, 1909–1914. VIC: AM P15608, 5 females (cw 5.6–9.2 mm, cl 5.3–8.8 mm), Port Phillip, 37°58’S, 144°54’E, 12 m, from Mytilus sp., I. Hiscock, 1967. NSW: AM P10094, 1 female (cw 9.4 mm, cl 9.0 mm), Sow & Pigs Shoal, Port Jackson, 33°50.3’S, 151°16.2’E, from ‘large black mussel’, L. Comtesse, May 1930; AM P5500, 1 male (cw 6.2 mm, cl 6.2 mm), near Cape Hawke, 32°13’S, 152°34’E, from pippi, J. Kinghorn; AM P4870, 1 male (cw 2.7 mm, cl 2.6 mm), 4 females (cw 6.2– 8.8 mm, cl 5.7–8.1 mm), Port Stephens, from Donax between mantle and gills, 152°06’E, E. Briggs, Sep 1919; AM P11481, 1 male (cw 4.7mm, cl 4.4 mm), 6 females (cw 5.3–8.5 mm, cl 4.6–7.3 mm), Brunswick Heads, 28°32’S, 153°33’E, from pippi, C. Chadwick; AM P4003, 10 females (cw 8.3–10.0 mm, cl 7.7–8.4 mm), S of Tweed Heads, 28°10’S, 153°33’E, from Donax deltoides on sandy beach, J. Campbell. QLD: AM P2217, 2 females (cw 8.7–10.0 mm, cl 7.4–7.8 mm), Mud Id., Moreton Bay, 27°20’S, 153°15’E, A. McCulloch.
Australian localities. Moreton Bay, southern Queensland to Victoria, Tasmania, South Australia, to Shark Bay, Western Australia.
Australian hosts. Bivalve molluscs. Mytilus sp., Eumarcia fumigata (Sowerby, 1853) , Modiolus sp. (all Mytilidae ) ( Griffin & Yaldwyn 1971, Pregenzer 1978). Neotrigonia margaritacea (Lamarck, 1804) (Trigoniidae) ( Wellington & Hiscock 1969). Donax deltoides Lamarck, 1818 (Donacidae) (this study).
Remarks. Davie (2002) noted that Rathbun’s (1923) record of Pinnotheres novaezelandiae (Filhol) from Bass Strait required verification. According to previous authors, Rathbun’s (1923) specimen was neither referable to P. novaezelandiae (fide Scott 1961), nor P. hickmani (as P. p i s u m) (see Griffin & Yaldwyn 1971). According to Griffin & Yaldwyn (1971), Rathbun’s (1923) specimen could not be identified with P. hickmani (as P. pisum ) because of the presence of a lateral extension of the orbits as indicated by the shallow groove adjacent to the eyes, a feature absent from P. hickmani . Griffin & Yaldwyn (1971) also noted the presence of a fringe of dactylar setae on the ambulatory limbs in Rathbun’s (1923) specimen but not P. hickmani (as P. p i s u m). Rathbun’s (1923) specimen (AM E5676), some of Griffin & Yaldwyn’s study material and other specimens in the Australian Museum were reexamined for this study. Rathbun’s (1923) record of P. novaezelandiae is based on P. hickmani . The groove lateral to the eyes in Rathbun’s (1923) specimen is an artefact of damage from overall dorsal compression to the specimen. The setation of the dactyli of the ambulatory limbs is similar in all specimens, but could appear absent if specimens were examined ‘dry’ instead of submerged in fluid. Therefore, we conclude that Pinnotheres novaezelandiae is currently not known from Australia.
As remarked under the account of Orthotheres haliotidis , Thomson’s (1893) report of Pinnixia faba from Tasmania, followed by Guiler (1952), is probably based on Pinnotheres hickmani , the common Tasmanian species.
Distribution. Shark Bay, Western Australia, Victoria, Tasmania ( Jones 1990), and now from New South Wales and southern Queensland.
NSW |
Royal Botanic Gardens, National Herbarium of New South Wales |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
InfraOrder |
Brachyura |
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Pinnotherinae |
Genus |
Pinnotheres hickmani ( Guiler, 1950 )
Ahyong, Shane T. & Brown, Diane E. 2003 |
Pinnotheres hickmani
Davie 2002: 433 |
Jones 1990: 202 |
Phillips 1984: 116 |
Page 1983: 156 |
Pregenzer 1978: 127 |
Pinnotheres pisum
Griffin 1971: 57 |
Wellington 1969: 333 |
Pinnotheres novae
Guiler 1952: 40 |
Fabia hickmani
Schmitt 1973: 24 |
Guiler 1952: 40 |
Guiler 1950: 67 |
Pinnotheres novaezelandiae
Rathbun 1923: 98 |
Pinnoteres pisum
Fulton 1906: 18 |
Pinnixa faba
Guiler 1952: 40 |
Thomson 1893: 49 |