Photinopygus mirabilis ( Erichson, 1840 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5292.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8DEB1E66-92FA-4200-91A9-4631057B0600 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7963578 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038687A2-FF9B-FF91-7286-15E8D950F85B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Photinopygus mirabilis ( Erichson, 1840 ) |
status |
|
Photinopygus mirabilis ( Erichson, 1840) View in CoL
( Figs. 5–6 View FIGURES 1–6 , 169–176 View FIGURES 169–172 View FIGURES 173–175 View FIGURE 176 )
Philonthus mirabilis Erichson, 1840: 494 View in CoL .
Xanthopygus mirabilis (Erichson) ; Bernhauer & Schubert 1914: 407.
Photinopygus mirabilis (Erichson) View in CoL ; Chatzimanolis 2021: 91.
Type material. Lectotype, here designated, male, with labels: “Hist. -Coll. ( Coleoptera ) Nr. 6158. Philonthus mirabilis Dej. Er. Bogota [4.711°, -74.072°], Boquet, Zool. Mus. Berlin ” / “ mirabilis Dej. Er. Bogota Buq.” / “ Syntype Philonthus mirabilis Erichson, 1840 labelled by MFNB 2020” / “ Lectotype Philonthus mirabilis Erichson des. Chatzimanolis 2022 ”. In the collection of MFNB. Paralectotype, here designated, female with labels: “6158” / “Hist. -Coll. ( Coleoptera ) Nr. 6158. Philonthus mirabilis Dej. Er. Bogota, Boquet, Zool. Mus. Berlin ” / “ Syntype Philonthus mirabilis Erichson, 1840 labelled by MFNB 2020” / “ Paralectotype Philonthus mirabilis Erichson des. Chatzimanolis 2022 ”. In the collection of MFNB.
Additional Materials. BOLIVIA: Cochabamba: 105 km E Yungas nr. Rio Carmen Mayu (Cochabamba-Villa Tunari Rd) [-17.146°, -65.732°], 1750 m, 1–6.ii.1999, FIT, R. Hanley leg., SM0161844 (1 ♀ SEMC) ; BRAZIL: Amazonas: unknown locality (1 ♁ SDEI) ; unknown state: unknown locality, Cameron coll. (1 ♁ NHMUK) ;
COLOMBIA: Capital District : Bogotá [4.71°, -74.07°], Sharp coll. (2 ♁, 1 ♀ NHMUK) ; same locality (1 ♀ CNC) ; same locality, Bernhauer coll. FMNHINS3975387 (1 ♁ FMNH) ; Caquetá: PNN Cordillera de lose Picachos [2.73°, -74.88°], 2000 m, 1–7.xi.1997, Malaise trap, E. González leg., SM0645111 (1 ♁ SEMC) ; Huila: PNN Cueva de Los, Guácharos Cabaña Cedros [1.62°, -76.10°], 2100 m, 28.xi.–2.xii.2001, Malaise trap, D. Campos leg., SM0549107, SM0549098, SM0549102, SM0549100 (2 ♁, 1 ♀ SEMC; 1 ♁ UTCI) ; same locality, Alto el Mirador, 1980 m, 7–21.xii.2001, Malaise trap, R. Paramero leg., SM0549131, SM0549111 (2 ♁ SEMC) ; Risaralda: SFF Otún Quimbaya El Molinillo [4.717°, -75.567°], 2220 m, 8–24.v.2003, Malaise trap, G. López leg. (1 ♀ SEMC) ; Valle del Cauca: Cali [3.42°, -76.52°], Fassl leg., Bernhauer coll., FMNHINS3975388, FMNHINS3975389 (1 ♁, 1 ♀ FMNH) ; unknown department: unknown locality (1 ♁, 1 ♀ NHMUK; 1 ♁, 1 ♀ SDEI; 1 ♁ AMNH; 1 ♁, 1 ♀ MHNG) ; unknown locality, FMNHINS3975386 (1 ♀ FMNH) ; ECUADOR: Napo: Cosanga 1 km N on Baeza-Tena Rd then 1.5 km SW on road to Sierra Azul [-0.59°, -77.89°], 2150 m, 5–7.xi.1999, FIT, Z.H. Falin leg., SM0352301 (1 ♀ SEMC) ; Baeza [-0.464°, -77.893°], Tottenham coll. (1 ♀ NHMUK) ; MEXICO: Veracruz: Jalapilla [18.83°, -97.09°], Scheerpeltz coll. (1 ♀ NMW) .
Diagnosis. Photinopygus mirabilis belongs in the mirabilis species group. Photinopygus mirabilis and P. thafmasios can be distinguished from all other species in Photinopygus by the presence of almost rainbow-like coloration on elytra ( Figs. 169 View FIGURES 169–172 , 220 View FIGURES 220–223 ). Photinopygus mirabilis differs from P. thafmasios in the following characters: pronotum color ( Fig. 171 View FIGURES 169–172 ) reddish-brown (black in P. thafmasios ; Fig. 222 View FIGURES 220–223 ), in lateral view, median lobe ( Fig. 173 View FIGURES 173–175 ) narrower apically than in P. thafmasios ( Fig. 224 View FIGURES 224–226 ), subapical tooth on medial lobe less pronounced than in P. thafmasios , and endophallus with a single lobe ( Fig. 174 View FIGURES 173–175 ) (two lobes in P. thafmasios ; Fig. 225 View FIGURES 224–226 ).
Description. Forebody ( Fig. 169 View FIGURES 169–172 ) length 6.3–6.6 mm. Color of head dark brown to black, pronotum and mesoscutellum reddish brown; antennomeres 1–5, reddish brown to brown; 6–11 yellow to orange; legs light to dark brown, except protarsi dark orange; elytra with diffraction gratings, almost rainbow-like coloration but color varies with angle of viewing; abdominal segments 3–5 reddish brown; abdominal segment 6 reddish brown or reddish brown with posterior half dark brown to black; abdominal segment 7 with anterior 2/3 half dark brown to black and posterior 1/3 orange; abdominal segment 8 orange. Antenna ( Fig. 172 View FIGURES 169–172 ) with antennomeres 3 without tomentose pubescence, antennomere 4 with faint tomentose pubescence; antennomeres 4–6 longer than wide; antennomeres 7 subquadrate; antennomeres 8–10 transverse. Head transverse; HW/HL ratio = 1.25–1.42. Posterior margin of head not extended posteriad on each side of neck. Head with sparse medium-sized punctures, distance between punctures as wide as 1–2 punctures but punctures denser posteriorly. Left mandible with bicuspid tooth. Pronotum ( Fig. 171 View FIGURES 169–172 ) subquadrate; PW/PL ratio = 0.95–1.00. Lateral margins of pronotum in dorsal view posteriad of midpoint concave; pronotum with 4–5 sparse rows of punctures on each half beside median impunctate line; distance between punctures as wide as 2–3 punctures but areas of pronotum without punctures. EL/PL ratio = 1.52–1.63. Elytra with sparse punctation; distance between punctures as wide as 1–2 punctures. Metepisternum with dorsal 1/3 without punctures throughout its length. Abdomen with tergites 3–4 glabrous (except line of punctures on posterior margin); tergites 3–5 with curved carina (arch-like). In males, sternite 7 without porose structure, sternite 7 with shallow and broad emargination posteriorly; sternite 8 with medium V-shaped emargination posteriorly ( Fig. 170 View FIGURES 169–172 ). Aedeagus as in Figs. 173–175 View FIGURES 173–175 ; in dorsal view paramere narrow, converging to rounded apex; paramere subequal and slightly narrower (except apically) than median lobe; in lateral view paramere almost parallel-sided; paramere with peg setae in median rows as in Fig. 175 View FIGURES 173–175 . Median lobe in dorsal view converging to narrow pointed tip; in lateral view median lobe becoming narrower; median lobe with small subapical tooth. Endophallus with single lobe.
Distribution. Known from the Pacific, Boreal Brazilian and South Brazilian biogeographic dominions. Distributed in the department of Cochabamba in Bolivia, the state of Amazonas in Brazil, the Capital District and the departments of Caquetá, Huila, Risaralda and Valle del Cauca in Colombia, from the province of Napo in Ecuador, and the state of Veracruz in Mexico. The specimen from Mexico may be mislabeled; Navarrete-Heredia (2004) listed the records of P. mirabilis from Mexico as dubious but without examining the specimen listed above. Map is shown in Fig. 176 View FIGURE 176 .
Habitat. Collected at mid to high elevation (1750–2220 m) using flight intercept and malaise traps.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubTribe |
Xanthopygina |
Genus |
Photinopygus mirabilis ( Erichson, 1840 )
Chatzimanolis, Stylianos 2023 |
Xanthopygus mirabilis (Erichson)
Bernhauer, M. & Schubert, K. 1914: 407 |
Philonthus mirabilis
Erichson, W. F. 1840: 494 |