Selenocosmiinae Simon 1889
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.280919 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6168298 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DE0287A9-FF93-5565-FF4A-74A9FC59412C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Selenocosmiinae Simon 1889 |
status |
|
Selenocosmiini Simon 1889: 204 (sub Selenocosmiae); Simon 1892: 147 (sub Selenocosmieae); Pocock 1895a: 168 (sub Selenocosmiidae); Raven 1985: 118.
Phlogiini Simon 1892: 144 (sub Phlogieae ). (synonymised by Simon 1903: 953).
Poecilotheriini Simon 1889: 204 (sub Poecilotheriae); Simon 1892: 144 (sub Poecilotherieae); Schmidt 1995:1–2 (subfamilial elevation); Raven 2005: 16; West et al. 2008: 38. Newly replaced into synonymy of Selenocosmiinae .
Chilobrachini trib. nov. West, Nunn & Hogg
Phlogiellini trib. nov. West, Nunn & Hogg
Diagnosis Maxilla with stridulation organ formed by an oval patch of modified setae (often bacillate) on prolateral face ( Figs 8, 9 View FIGURES 8 – 13 , 47 View FIGURES 46 – 48 , 49a View FIGURES 49 a – 50 b. 49 a, b , 50a, 51a, 52a), originating medially (not ventrally from the oral fringe), opposing modified setae (strikers) in multiple rows on the retrolateral cheliceral surface ( Figs 10, 12 View FIGURES 8 – 13 , 48 View FIGURES 46 – 48 , 50b, 51b, 52b): maxillary lyra reduced or absent in some genera, cheliceral strikers retained, sternal sigilla largely removed from sternal margins ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 2 – 7 ), many labial cuspules (>200, except Poecilotheria >50) ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 2 – 7 ), leg spines only found distally on metatarsi, tibial apophyses on leg I in mature males absent.
Genera included: Chilobrachys Karsch 1891 , Coremiocnemis Simon 1892 , Haplocosmia Schmidt & von Wirth 1996, Lyrognathus Pocock 1895 , Orphnaecus Simon 1892 , Phlogiellus Pocock 1897 , Poecilotheria Simon 1885 , Psednocnemis gen. nov. West, Nunn & Hogg, Selenocosmia Ausserer 1871 , Selenotholus Hogg 1902 and Selenotypus Pocock 1895 .
Remarks: West et al. (2008) considered Poecilotheria as its own subfamily Poecilotherinae, presumably following Schmidt (1995). However, we do not recognize Poecilotherinae as a valid subfamily as it lacks any significant synapomorphies to define it from other subfamilies, particularly from Selenocosmiinae (but only synapomorphies of generic significance). Further, dividing the two groups would leave Selenocosmiinae lacking any synapomorphies, something Schmidt (1995) apparently did not consider. With the two groups synonymized, herein, Selenocosmiinae can again be defined by synapomorphies discovered herein (but subject to further testing through the addition of outgroups), and previously ( Raven 1985). During the course of gathering data for cladistic analyses, the authors noted a distinct lack of labial cuspules in Poecilotheria species compared to all other Selenocosmiinae and have, herein, adjusted the Selenocosmiinae diagnosis to account for this trait. Additionally, the authors consider the presence of multiple rows of cheliceral strikers a serial homologue for Selenocosmiinae (see Character discussion), but only when Poecilotheriini is included.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |