Pherotilla brothersi Zhou, Lelej & Xu
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4273.4.8 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C76A65ED-F3D5-43AF-926D-BF8D599174FE |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6033321 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/39D34F6D-D41E-46F4-9A37-A2E3E5ACA331 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:39D34F6D-D41E-46F4-9A37-A2E3E5ACA331 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pherotilla brothersi Zhou, Lelej & Xu |
status |
sp. nov. |
Pherotilla brothersi Zhou, Lelej & Xu , sp. nov.
( Figs 1–25 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURES 2 – 8 View FIGURES 9 – 12 View FIGURES 13 – 19 View FIGURES 20 – 25 )
Type material. Holotype, ♂, pinned, with genitalia and apical tergum and sternum in a separate micro vial, attached to the same pin, China: Yunnan, Xishuangbanna, Nabanhe National Nature Reserve, 19–23.vii.2011, yellow pan trap, Na-sen Wei & Zai-fu Xu et al., No. 2015000584 ( SCAU) . Paratype: China: 1♂, glued on card, with genitalia and apical tergum and sternum in a separate micro vial, attached to the same pin, Yunnan, Baoshan, Mangkuan, 18.vii.2006, Zeng Jie , No. 2016000140 ( IBSS) .
Diagnosis. Body entirely black, with whitish setae. Clypeus rugulose, submarginally polished and impunctate, with four blunt teeth on anterior margin and median submarginal tubercle. Scape subcarinate beneath on distal onethird. Metasomal tergum 1 with two short longitudinal lateral carinae on each side. Metasomal sternum 6 with posterior margin deeply notched on each side and with prominent pair sublateral processes on each side. Hypopygium (sternum 8) strongly sculptured, with lateral peg-like process, and broadly and unevenly emarginate posteriorly; lateral process with four strong setae mixed with shorter ones; median emargination with a pair of strong setae on each side. Paramere with long dense thin setae, without few slightly stronger long setae near base.
Description. Holotype. Male ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). Body length 7.6–9.8 mm. Forewing length 6.2–7.7 mm. Body black except apicoventral spot on scape, fore spurs piceous, mid- and hind spurs whitish. Wing infuscate on distal half. Body and legs with whitish setae. Scape with longer, pedicel and flagellum with shorter whitish setae ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 2 – 8 ).
Head. Relative width of head and mesosoma including tegulae = 9.8:10.4. Head densely and coarsely punctate ( Figs 3–5 View FIGURES 2 – 8 ). The ratio of postocellar (interocellar) distance: ocellocular distance: distance between inner edges of posterior ocellus and anterior ocellus: diameter of anterior ocellus (paratype in brackets) = 23(15):75(42):18(11):21(14). Transverse with vertex slightly rounded, and without elevation behind posterior ocelli ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 2 – 8 ). Posterodorsal margin of head slightly curved in frontal view ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 2 – 8 ). Scape subcarinate beneath on distal one third. Relative proportion of length to width of antennal segment as follows: scape (108:21), pedicel (21:18), F1(20:18), F2(25:21), F3(26:23), F4(28:24), F5(28:24), F6(26:24), F7(24:23), F8(20:23), F9(19:22), F10(21:19), F11(42:17) ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 2 – 8 ). Mandible tridentate, with subapical tooth smaller than other two ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 2 – 8 ); ventral basal lamella gradually narrowed apicad without any tooth or tubercle. Clypeus rugulose, submarginally polished and impunctate, with four blunt teeth on anterior margin and median submarginal tubercle. Genal carina absent. Postgena plain. Antennal scrobes above with transverse carina. Occipital carina well developed dorsally.
Mesosoma. Pronotum, mesoscutum and mesoscutellum densely and coarsely punctate ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 2 – 8 ). Tegula mostly smooth and shining, slightly recurved posteriorly ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 2 – 8 ). Mesonotum without anteromedian lines or longitudinal ridge. Notaulus short, incomplete anteriorly, one quarter of mesoscutum length, ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 2 – 8 ). Parapsidal line incomplete anteriorly and posteriorly, shorter and shallower than notaulus ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 2 – 8 ). Mesoscutellum evenly convex, not projected posterad, with dense whitish setae along lateral margin ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 2 – 8 ). Mesopleuron mostly coarsely and densely punctate, with dense whitish setae ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 2 – 8 ). Mesopleuron along promesopleural suture longitudinally striate, along mesometapleural suture smooth. Metapleuron and propodeum laterally smooth and shining ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 2 – 8 ). Propodeum with whitish setae and reticulate rugose on dorsal and posterior surfaces ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 9 – 12 ); with sparse whitish setae, and shining, transverse shallow depression on lateral surfaces ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 2 – 8 ).
Legs. Whitish setae denser on tibiae and tarsi than that on femora. Mid- and hind tibia without preapical dorsal or lateral spines. Fore, mid- and hind tibia with strong tibial spurs.
Wings. Forewing with elongate sclerotized pterostigma; first and second submarginal and first medial cells closed, vein Rs 2, 3r-m and 2m-cu nebulous; first submarginal cell 0.85 × as long as marginal cell ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 2 – 8 ).
Metasoma. Metasomal segment 1 densely and coarsely punctate, other segments moderately punctate, each segment fringed apically with longer and denser, whitish setae ( Figs 10–12 View FIGURES 9 – 12 ). Metasomal segment 1 three-quarters as long as hind femur; with two short basal longitudinal lateral carinae on each side of tergum 1; sternum roof like without carina. Metasomal sternum 6 with posterior margin deeply notched on each side and with prominent pair sublateral processes on each side. Pygidium (tergum 7) with median, subgibbose, smooth longitudinal area ending before apex on area length, with apical margin rounded, preapical area smooth, other part of tergum with small punctures mixed with twice larger but sparser ones ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 13 – 19 ). Hypopygium (sternum 8) strongly sculptured with lateral peg-like process and broadly and unevenly emarginate posteriorly; lateral process with four strong setae mixed with shorter ones; median emargination with pair strong setae on each side ( Figs 14–16 View FIGURES 13 – 19 ).
Genitalia. Basal ring moderate. Paramere with narrow apex slightly upcurved; with long dense thin setae, without few slightly thicker long setae near base. Penis valves asymmetrical, right valve longer than left, without setae ( Figs 17–19 View FIGURES 13 – 19 ). Volsella somewhat swollen with microsetae dorsally.
Female. Unknown.
Distribution. China (Yunnan).
Remarks. The male of P. brothersi is similar to that of P. oceanica, but differs in having body entirely black (at least antenna, mandible, tegula and legs partly reddish-brown in P. oceanica); paramere with dense long setae, without longer thicker setae along basodorsal margin (with dense short setae, and one longer thicker setae along basodorsal margin in P. oceanica).
Etymology. The new species is dedicated to Denis J. Brothers, the world authority in Mutillidae , who recently revised the subfamily Rhopalomutillinae .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Rhopalomutillinae |
Genus |