Larentiinae
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.185522 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6223298 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AC87C0-EB08-FF99-04D6-0055FD0BFB3A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Larentiinae |
status |
|
[ Larentiinae View in CoL View at ENA 2]
[172–176] [Perizomini]: Attribution to tribe according to the Palearctic concept ( Mironov 2003). For doubts about generic assignment see under P. pastoralis . Probably the species is related to Ennada and certain “ Nebula ” species e.g., N. ceres ( Larentiini ?, see below) and does not belong to Perizomini. Multigene analysis (COI, EF1alpha, 28S) shows these three branches ( Perizoma pastoralis , Ennada and Nebula ceres -group) united.
[172–176] Perizoma pastoralis ( Butler, 1882)
[177–179] Ennada pellicata ( Felder & Rogenhofer, 1875) : The position in the tribe Larentiini is well supported by habitus and genitalia structure. See remarks to [172–176]. The status of both forms with and without the projection of medial area towards the termen as infrasubspecific, infrapopulational forms is confirmed by COI data.
[180–191] “ Nebula ” sp. 1 and “ Nebula ” ceres ( Butler, 1882) : See remarks to [172–176].
[198–210] Eupithecia sp. 4: Difficult group with variable habitus, probably including Eupithecia spurcata (Warren, 1904) . COI data revealing a heterogenous pattern of different haplotypes, mean “intra”specific variation 1.7%, maximum pairwise distance 3.4%. Probably corresponding to several different species.
[217–219] Genus AH 6 sp. 1: Possibly an eupitheciine genus, as tentatively suggested by position in the NJ tree. In the multigene analysis (COI, EF1alpha, 28S) however rather grouping with Perizoma pastoralis than with Eupitheciini .
[220–222] “ Nebula ” diana ( Butler, 1882) and “ Nebula ” adela ( Butler, 1893): For polyphyly of the genus ” Nebula ” and doubtful generic combination(s) see remarks [41–46; 49–58; 180–191; 220–222].
[223; 226–231]: see remarks to genus Hoplosauris [30–33; 223; 226–231]
[232] Triptiloides sp. 1 ( cf. esmeralda ): Molecular analysis (COI) suggesting species diversity from T. esmeralda [233–235]: minimum pairwise distance: 2.3% (mean intraspecific variation of the latter 0.2%).
[236–240] Orthonama plemyrata ( Felder & Rogenhofer, 1875) : In Scoble (1999) as synonym of Orthonama obstipata ( Fabricius, 1794) . Separated from Old world sister species in Hausmann & Hebert (2008).
[241–242] Rheumaptera sp. 1 (cf. " Larentia " irma ): see remarks to genus Rheumaptera [59–64; 241–242]. Tribal and generic relationships awaiting revision. Molecular analysis (COI) not revealing close relationship to Palaearctic species of the genus Rheumaptera .
[#] Hoplosauris valeria Butler, 1893 : specimen not yet barcoded; unnamed genus according to Scoble (1999), but assignment to Hoplosauris probable.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |