Peramus sp.

Allain, Ronan, Vullo, Romain, Rozada, Lee, Anquetin, Jérémy, Bourgeais, Renaud, Goedert, Jean, Lasseron, Maxime, Martin, Jeremy E., Pérez-García, Adán, Fabrègues, Claire Peyre De, Royo-Torres, Rafael, Augier, Dominique & Bailly, Gilles, 2022, Vertebrate paleobiodiversity of the Early Cretaceous (Berriasian) Angeac-Charente Lagerstätte (southwestern France): implications for continental faunal turnover at the J / K boundary, Geodiversitas 44 (25), pp. 683-752 : 731

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5252/geodiversitas2022v44a25

publication LSID

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EA12DCB7-A5BE-4763-B805-25087EBD726D

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6929072

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C887B9-FF84-FFD8-74BE-A56AFE00FDC1

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Peramus sp.
status

 

Peramus sp.

( Fig. 34 View FIG G-I)

DESCRIPTION

Peramuridae are represented by at least two lower molars. Only a left lower molar (ANG M-25), the talonid and the roots of which are missing, is figured herein ( Fig. 34 View FIG G-I). The talonid is present on the other molar, and it clearly displays a hypoconulid separated from the hypoconid, a diagnostic feature of Peramuridae ( Davis 2012) . The main cusp of the trigonid, i.e. the protoconid, is slightly inclined posteriorly ( Fig. 34H View FIG ). The paraconid is mesiodistally narrower and apicobasally shorter than the metaconid.It is located higher and in a more labial position. The metaconid is visible in labial view, whereas it is hidden by the protoconid in the Moroccan genus Minimus ( Sigogneau-Russell 1999).Both the anterolabial (cusp e) and the anterolateral (cusp f) marginal cuspules are preserved ( Fig.34G View FIG ). The latter is much more developed than the former. They define a strongly developed hypoconulid embrasure. All these features are more reminiscent of the lower molars (m2 and m3) of Peramus tenuirostris and P. dubius from the Berriasian of Dorset, England ( Clemens & Mills 1971), than to any other peramuran taxon (Sigogneau-Russell 1999). However, the scarcity of material prevents any comparison based on measurements, and does not allow a reliable specific identification ( Davis 2012). Thus, we assign this tooth to Peramus sp.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Mammalia

Order

Multituberculata

SuperFamily

Dryolestoidea

Family

Peramuridae

Genus

Peramus

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF