Pinnotheroidea, De Haan, 1833 [in De Haan, 1833-, 1850
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3665.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8358B363-BEE3-416D-96CA-8614E38B61D5 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BB9C75-FF6C-FF14-FF78-FD0BFACFFEEF |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Pinnotheroidea |
status |
|
Superfamily Pinnotheroidea View in CoL
The male gonopore opens on the sternum ( Figs. 33B, C View FIGURE 33 , 58C, D View FIGURE 58 ). Although very poorly documented, even unknown, in the various taxa of the group, the male gonopore is located rather far from the P5 coxa and close to or variously distant from suture 7/ 8 in pinnotherids, e.g., Ostracotheres tridacnae , Pinnotheres pisum ( Guinot 1979a: 212, figs. 24D, 53G), Pinnixa transversalis , and in aphanodactylids, e.g., Aphanodactylus loimiae , Gustavus mecognathus (see Ahyong & Ng 2009a: figs. 1F, G, 4I) and Uruma ourana (see Naruse, Fujita & Ng 2009: 60, 66, fig. 2c), however apparently adjacent to suture 7/ 8 in Aphanodactylus panglao (see Ng & Naruse 2009: fig. 3c). It was described “with medially directed roof” in Pinnixa lata Komatsu & Takeda, 2009 ( Komatsu & Takeda 2009: 202). The male thoracic sternum is only exceptionally described among the more than 300 pinnotherid species, thus cannot be used in higher taxonomic ranks. The sternal plate seems to vary from moderately wide ( Fig. 33B View FIGURE 33 ) to widened ( Ahyong & Ng 2009a: figs. 1F, 2C, 4I, 5I), with all the sutures interrupted. The sternite 3 is hypertrophied in the typical taxa with highly modified mxp3 (see e.g., Parapinnixa glasselli Garth, 1939 , see Garth 1939: pl. 9, fig. 2) as well as in the family Aphanodactylidae , which, however, lacks this chief synapomorphy of Pinnotheroidea ( Ahyong & Ng 2009a: 33, fig. 1F; Naruse & & Maenosono 2012: fig. 1b). The disposition of sternites 1, 2 needs to be studied in Pinnotheroidea . The P5 may be substantially reduced in Pinnotheridae , e.g., in Pinnixa White, 1846 ( Wicksten 2012: figs. 58, 59) and in some Aphanodactylidae ( Ahyong & Ng 2009a: figs. 4A, H, 5A, H, 7; Naruse & Maenosono 2012: fig. 1a, c, d).
The Pinnotheridae View in CoL , raised to suprafamilial status ( Ng, Guinot & Davie 2008: 247), traditionally seen as Catometopa and a thoracotreme family (e.g., Guinot 1978a; Števčić 1998; Martin & Davis 2001; Ng, Guinot & Davie 2008), was interpreted as having a coxo-sternal condition and thus assigned to Heterotremata by Guinot & Richer de Forges (1997: 496, table 1) and Guinot & Bouchard (1998: 654). According to Schubart (in Martin & Davis 2001: 55), Schubart, Neigel & Felder (2000a: 826, 827, fig. 1), and Wetzer et al. (2009: 486, fig. 1, as Pinnotheridae View in CoL ) the traditional thoracotreme condition of Pinnotheroidea was evident from DNA sequencing. The larval data, on the contrary, appears to show a close relationship with Leucosiidae View in CoL ( Lebour 1928b; Gurney 1938, 1942) and with the Hymenosomatidae View in CoL ( Aikawa 1937; Gurney 1938; Wear 1967, 1968; Lucas 1971; Wear & Fielder 1985) so that according to Rice (1980: 347) it seemed inconceivable that the similarities between them “could have evolved independently” (see discussion by Clark & Ng, 2010, about the actually superficial similarity of larvae in small crabs, as in the case of the first zoea of Domecia glabra Alcock, 1899 View in CoL , which is similar to that of Pinnotheridae View in CoL ). The alternative possibility, that of a possible close ancestor shared with Hymenosomatoidea View in CoL as has been suggested by Gurney (1942), Scotto & Gore (1981) and Rice (1980), but finally discounted by Rice (1983), is discussed here (see Monophyletic Thoracotremata; Position of the Cryptochiroidea and Pinnotheroidea within the Brachyura ). The gills of Pinnotheridae View in CoL were considered close to those of Hymensomatidae ( Claus 1886).
A monophyletic Pinnotheroidea is not supported by adult morphology (e.g., Campos 1996), and study of combined sequence data has demonstrated its polyphyly ( Palacios-Theil et al. 2009, as Pinnotheridae View in CoL ). The suite of characters introduced by Bürger (1895), then traditionally used by taxonomists ( Ahyong & Ng 2007a, b), do not include the thoracic sternum of the rarely collected males. Uncertainties remain about the phylogenetic relationships of the group with other Brachyura View in CoL despite numerous taxonomic studies (e.g., Marques & Pohle 1995, 1996a, b; Pohle & Marques 1998 a, b; Ng & Manning 2003; Bolaños et al. 2004, 2005; George & Boone 2003; Ahyong & Brown 2003a; Ahyong & Ng 2005, 2007a, b, 2009a; Thoma et al. 2009; Komatsu & Ohtsuk 2009; Campos 2009; Becker & Türkay 2010; Ocampo et al. 2010; Campos & Hernández-Ávila 2010; Ahyong 2010).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pinnotheroidea
GUINOT, DANIÈLE, TAVARES, MARCOS & CASTRO, PETER 2013 |
Domecia glabra
Alcock 1899 |
Cryptochiroidea
Paulson 1875 |
Pinnotheroidea
De Haan, 1833 [in De Haan, 1833- 1850 |
Pinnotheroidea
De Haan, 1833 [in De Haan, 1833- 1850 |
Pinnotheroidea
De Haan, 1833 [in De Haan, 1833- 1850 |
Hymenosomatidae
McLeay 1838 |
Hymenosomatoidea
MacLeay 1838 |
Pinnotheridae
De Haan 1833 |
Pinnotheridae
De Haan 1833 |
Pinnotheridae
De Haan 1833 |
Pinnotheridae
De Haan 1833 |
Pinnotheridae
De Haan 1833 |
Leucosiidae
Samouelle 1819 |