Timmia Hopper, 1961
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4578.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CE27CD48-70BB-4979-9C67-A1A2E1BAAFFD |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/52215C67-FFE0-FF93-FF21-FEE28438FD47 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Timmia Hopper, 1961 |
status |
|
Genus Timmia Hopper, 1961
The genus was erected in Chromadorinae to accommodate two species [( T. bipapillata ( Chitwood, 1951) and T. parva ( Timm, 1952) ] which were previously described as Parachromadora by Timm (1952). The generic name Parachromadora was already preoccupied by Parachromadora Micoletzky, 1914 and for this reason it was necessary to propose a new genus name ( Hopper 1961). T. bipapillata was firstly described as Prochromadorella bipapillata by Chitwood (1951), but this author also suggested that the species could belong to a different genus since its terminal bulb was very well developed. The last species added to this genus was T. acuticauda Galtsova, 1976 . Timmia largely resembles Chromadorina except for the presence of tubular precloacal supplement, which was not described or even drawn for T. bipapillata , but detected later by Hopper (1961) when checking some T. bipapillata specimens.
Diagnosis (modified from Tchesunov 2014): Homogeneous cuticle with transverse rows of dots but without lateral differentiation. Amphideal fovea slit-like, when visible. Buccal cavity with three teeth of about equal size. Posterior single pharyngeal bub well developed. Presence of tubular curved precloacal supplements. Marine.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |