Pallisentis thapari, Gautam & Misra & Saxena & Monks, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4766.1.7 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A8B9071B-1DA9-436C-BD3D-131E526298E3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3804149 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/294DD60F-1233-47D0-A85E-CDC3B24FABC1 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:294DD60F-1233-47D0-A85E-CDC3B24FABC1 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Pallisentis thapari |
status |
sp. nov. |
Pallisentis thapari n. sp.
( Figs. 1–8 View FIGURES 1–8 and 15–18 View FIGURES 15–20 )
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:294DD60F-1233-47D0-A85E-CDC3B24FABC1
Type host: Spotted snakehead Channa punctatus (Bloch, 1793) ( Perciformes , Channidae ).
Type locality: Nabi Panah Pond, Malihabad, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India (26.5830° N, 80.4322° E).
Additional host: Channa striatus (Bloch, 1793) ( Perciformes , Channidae ).
Site of infection: Intestine.
Specimens deposited: Holotype deposited in Gangetic Plane Regional Centre , Zoological Survey of India ( ZSI), Patna, India- male ZSI / GPRC, IV–4356a and allotype female ZSI / GPRC, IV–4356 b. Paratypes deposited at the Helminthology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, U.P., India- males LU /Z/2019/1– LU /Z/2019/07 and females LU /Z/2019/08– LU /Z/2019/014.
Zoobank Registration: The Life Science Identifier (LSID) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:53DFA57F-4D6A-49DE-8664-0C8B080C58E8
Etymology: The new species is named in honor of the late Dr. Gobind Singh Thapar, Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, Lucknow, India, for his outstanding contributions in Helminthology.
Diagnosis: Quadrigyridae , Pallisentinae , with characters of the genus Pallisentis as diagnosed by Amin et al. (2000). Worms cylindrical, relatively large sized, range of length of males and females overlapping but mean length of males slightly longer than females. Trunk with Y-shaped spines in rings, with anterior set of 14–17 closely spaced rings of collar spines and posterior set of 14–41 more widely spaced rings of trunk spines; posterior set reaching posteriorly only to mid body. Anterior and posterior sets of trunk spines separated by a narrow region lacking spines. Trunk spines conical with an optically-dense Y-shaped core. Proboscis short, broadly ovoid, wider anteriorly, with 4 circles of 8–10 hooks each, hooks decreasing in size posteriorly. Proboscis receptacle single-walled, with cerebral ganglion located at base. Lemnisci cylindrical, much longer than the receptacle, posterior ends hanging loose in body cavity, about equal in length. In males, testes dollioform-depressed in shape (width to length ratio 1.0:3.3), contiguous and slightly overlapping. Cement gland oblong-very depressed in shape, width to length ratio 1:6, syncytial, about as long as testicular field, containing 23–30 giant nuclei. Cement reservoir and Saefftigen’s pouch present. Parasites of freshwater fishes in India.
Description: Material examined: seven male and seven female specimens, and two specimens for SEM.
Male. Worms relatively large in size ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–8 ). Trunk 4.9–8.0 (6.6) mm long, 420–560 (484) µm a widest point. Anterior part of trunk (about 1/2) ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–8 ) covered with 29–58 rings of tegmental spines, pointing posteriorly ( Figs. 1 View FIGURES 1–8 and 16 View FIGURES 15–20 ), number of spines per ring declining in numbers from anterior to posterior. Circles of spines separated into two fields, anterior set composed of 15–17 closely spaced rings, each ring consisting of 12–22 spines, called collar spines, and posterior set of 21–41 more widely spaced rings of trunk spines, each anteriormost ring composed of 12–16 spines ( Figs. 16 and 17 View FIGURES 15–20 ). Area covered by collar spines 340–800 (457) long. Anterior and posterior groups of spines separated by narrow spine-free zone 100–180 (139) in length. Circles of trunk spines reaching posteriorly only to mid-body, ending anterior to testicular field. Individual spines 40–50 (47) long, 20–40 (30) wide at the base. Proboscis globular, broadly ovoid in shape, wider anteriorly and narrowing posteriorly, 230–280 (243) long, 220–260 (241.4) wide anteriorly ( Figs. 1, 3 View FIGURES 1–8 and 15 View FIGURES 15–20 ). Proboscis with rooted hooks in 4 circles of 8–10 hooks each ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1–8 ). Hooks longest in first circle, decreasing in size posteriorly in succeeding rings ( Figs. 3, 4 View FIGURES 1–8 and 15 View FIGURES 15–20 ). Blades of hooks in anterior circles relatively straight and oriented laterally because of position of insertion point or root; blades increasingly curved posteriorly. Length of hooks from anterior to posterior, 100–130 (112), 80–110 (96), 40–70 (52), 30–50 (34); size ratios anterior to posterior 1.0:0.9:0.5:0.3. Neck short, robust, 150–290 (199) long, 160–290 (213) wide posteriorly. Proboscis receptacle 340–890 (547) long by 130–220 (161) wide. Lemnisci paired, cylindroid, much longer than the receptacle and almost equal sized; right lemniscus 730–2450 (1560) long, 40–60 (52) wide posteriorly, left lemniscus 1200–2450 (1625) long, 40–60 (52) wide. Reproductive system in posterior half of trunk. Testes dollioform-depressed in shape, contiguous with slight overlap. Anterior testis 440–720 (521) long, 140–210 (161) wide; posterior testis 440–730 (53) long, 140–220 (167) wide. Cement gland contiguous with testes, about size of testicular field, 680–1550 (1061) long by 130–240 (180) wide, containing 23–30 nuclei. Cement reservoir contiguous with cement gland, branching posteriorly into two ducts, 550–1070 (824) long, 140–230 (184) wide. Saefftigen’s pouch obdeltoid/very narrowly spatulate in shape, 160–340 (272) long, 130–200 (17) wide anteriorly. Seminal vesicle 400–800 (596) long, 70–140 (104) wide. Gonopore terminal ( Figs. 1 and 2 View FIGURES 1–8 ). Bursa, when extended ( Figs. 1, 2 View FIGURES 1–8 and 18 View FIGURES 15–20 ), 200–300 (183) long and 100–240 (164) wide.
Female. Worms slightly smaller in size than males ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1–8 ). Trunk 4.0–7.7 (6.3) mm long, 490–590 µm (503) µm at widest point.Anterior part of trunk (approximately anterior half) ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1–8 ) covered with 30–41 rings of tegmental spines, pointing posteriorly ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1–8 ), number of spines per ring declining in number from anterior to posterior. Circles of spines separated into two fields, anterior set composed of 14–15 closely spaced rings, called collar spines, each ring composed of 16–26 spines and posterior set of 14–40 more widely spaced rings of trunk spines, each ring made up of 12–24 spines. Length of trunk covered by collar spines 430–570 (530) long. Spine-free zone narrow 100–190 (147) in length. Circles of trunk spines reaching posteriorly only to mid-body, ending anterior to testicular field. Individual spines 40–51 (48) long, 20–40 (31) wide at the base. Proboscis globular, broadly ovoid in shape, wider anteriorly and narrowing posteriorly, 180–260 (213) long, 190–250 (220) wide anteriorly ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1–8 ). Proboscis with rooted hooks in 4 circles of 8–10 hooks each ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1–8 ). Hooks longest in first circle, hooks decreasing in size posteriorly in succeeding rings ( Figs. 6 View FIGURES 1–8 ). Blades of hooks in anterior circles relatively straight and oriented laterally because of position of insertion point or root; blades increasingly curved posteriorly. Length of hooks of proboscis of paratype female, from anterior to posterior, 140, 120, 70, 40; size ratios anterior to posterior 1.0:0.9:0.5:0.3. Neck short, robust, 170–460 (296) long, 160–240 (197) wide posteriorly. Proboscis receptacle 440–840 (643) long, 80–250 (173) wide. Lemnisci paired, cylindroid, much longer than the receptacle and equal in size, 1,600 –2,600 (2,110 ± 500.0) long, 40–60 (53) wide posteriorly. Reproductive system in posterior end of trunk, uterine bell cylindrical shaped, 240–330 (280) long and 50–110 (78) wide ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1–8 ). Uterus 50–260 (110) long, 30–110 (63) wide. Vagina 30–90 (53.3 ± 20.7) long, 30–50 (38.3 ± 9.8) wide. Ovarian balls present in some females, 40–80 (59) long, 20–60 (41) wide. Eggs 15–20 (18) long, 10–10 wide ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 1–8 ) (width to length ratio about 2:3). Gonopore ventro-terminal ( Figs. 6 and 7 View FIGURES 1–8 ).
Remarks: Amin et al. (2000) re-described Pallisentis and provided a more detailed diagnosis for the genus. The new species is placed in Pallisentis because it has an anterior set of closely arranged rings of collar spines (15–17 rings) and a posterior set of more widely spaced rings of trunk spines (14–41) separated from the collar spines by a region lacking spines. Giant hypodermal nuclei are present in the trunk wall, the proboscis is broadly ovoid in shape with rooted hooks in 4 circles of 8–10 hooks in each, and the proboscis receptacle is single-walled with the cerebral ganglion located near the base. The lemnisci are much longer than the receptacle, and the syncytial cement gland is long (about as long as the testicular field) with many giant nuclei. The new species is placed in this genus because it shares these characters.
If the subgenera of Pallisentis established by Amin et al. (2000) is accepted, P. thapari n. sp. is similar to species previously assigned to the subgenus P. ( Pallisentis ) Amin, Heckmann, Ha, Luc, and Doanh, 2000 because the longest hooks are in first circle and the hooks of succeeding circles decrease in size posteriorly ( Amin et al. 2000). The new species can be distinguished from all known species of Pallisentis because the trunk spines do not extend to the posterior end of either sex, the proboscis hooks in first circles are more than 100 long, and the average length of the proboscis receptacle is more than 500 long.
Pallisentis thapari n. sp. is most similar in form to P. clupei Gupta and Gupta, 1979 ); the length of the first hook in both is about 100, but P. clupei is reported to have conical trunk spines and the new species has spines with a Yshaped core ( Gupta & Gupta 1979). In P. clupei , the number of circles of collar spines (12–13 circles in males and 13–14 in females) is similar bit less than that of the new species (15–17 in males and 14–15 in females), although the number of spines per circle in males of P. clupei overlaps with that of the new species (14–20 spines vs. 12–22, respectively). The number of circles of trunk spines in males in both species overlaps ( P. clupei 28–30; P. thapari n. sp. 21–41), but the number of circles of trunk spines in females of P. clupei (61) is greater than for females of the new species (14–40). The number of trunk spines in P. clupei and that of the new species also overlaps (males 8–16; females 10–16 vs. males 12–16; females 12–24, respectively). Additionally, the new species can be distinguished from P. clupei in that the trunk spines of the new species extend only to mid-body but they extend to the posterior end in P. clupei . The number of spines in each circle of trunk spines in P. clupei (8–16 in males and 10–16 in females) is less than in P. thapari n. sp. (12–16 in males and 12–24) in females, although there is some overlap in range. Finally, in males, the size and position of testes and the size of the cement gland are similar in P. clupei (1390–1550 long) and the new species (680–1550 long), but in P. clupei there are 9–16 giant nuclei in the cement gland and that of the new species has 23–30 nuclei.
Seven species of Pallisentis have been reported to have spines that are Y-shaped ( Amin et al. 2000; Gautam et al. 2019): P. basiri Farooqi, 1958 ; P. cavasii Gupta and Verma, 1980 ; P. fasciata Gupta and Verma, 1980 ; P. guptai Gupta and Fatma, 1986 ; P. indica Mithal and Lai, 1981 ; P. mehrai Gupta and Fatma, 1986 ; P. panadei Rai, 1967 ; and P. unnaoensis Gautam, Misra, and Saxena, 2019 ( Farooqi 1958; Rai 1967; Gupta & Verma 1980; Mithal & Lal 1981; Gupta & Fatma 1986; Gautam et al. 2019). In some species the spines are more flattened and evidence of the Y-shape core can be seen externally ( Gautam et al. 2019). In the new species the spines are conical but with the Yshaped core ( Figs. 5 View FIGURES 1–8 and 17 View FIGURES 15–20 ).
Comparisons among species of Pallisentis are difficult because many of the type specimens are not available and one must rely on descriptions in the literature. However, the new species can be distinguished from the abovementioned species by various features. Pallisentis thapari n. sp. is larger than P. cavasii , P. fasciata , and P. unnaoensis (4.9–8.0 mm vs. 2.1–3.0, 2.9–4.0, and 3.4–4.4, respectively) and the new species has more nuclei in the cement gland (23–30 vs. 6–8, 8–10, and 7–8, respectively), and the proboscis hooks of the first row of the new species are longer (100–130) than those of P. cavasii (50–51), P. fasciata (60–70), and P. panadei (70–50) and they are shorter than those of P. unnaoensis (220). The hooks in the first row of the new species and those of P. basiri are about the same size (approximately 100), but the roots of the hooks of the new species are elongate and those of P. basiri are described as being knob-like ( Amin et al. 2000). The cement gland of males of the new species is longer than that of P. guptai (680–1550 vs. 500–580, respectively) and the number of nuclei is greater (28–30 vs. 10–12, respectively). Males of the new species have more nuclei in the cement gland than those of P. indica (23–30 vs. 9–18) ( Amin et al. 2017a). The trunk spines of the new species reach posteriorly only to about mid-body but those of P. mehrai reach to the posterior end in both males and females. Finally, in results of the molecular analysis, P. unnaoensis is the sister taxa to the clade comprised of the three specimens of the new species. The new species is similar to P. unnaoensis in the number of rings and spines per ring of collar and trunk spines, but the cement gland is longer in the new species (680–1550 vs. 380–520) and the number of nuclei in the cement gland is greater (23–30 vs. 7–8).
LU |
St. Petersburg University |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |