Oedichirus rubronotatus PIC, 1903
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.21248/contrib.entomol.69.2.197-238 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9B8BCFC0-C491-45EF-9BC8-04A6B6B7DB8C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5914575 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AA5C87B4-A614-FFEE-72D7-F7F16535FE69 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Oedichirus rubronotatus PIC, 1903 |
status |
|
Oedichirus rubronotatus PIC, 1903 View in CoL , revalidated
Oedichirus terminatus var. rubronotatus PIC, 1903: 145 View in CoL .
Oedichirus dimidiatus REITTER, 1906: 263 View in CoL f.; preoccupied.
Oedichirus reitteri BERNHAUER, 1908: 33 View in CoL ; syn. nov.
Comment: The description of O. rubronotatus , a name originally made available as a variety of O. terminatus ERICHSON, 1843 , is based on an unspecified number of syntypes from “ Crête ” ( PIC 1903). The name was treated as infrasubspecific by KOCH (1936) and subsequently regarded as a junior synonym of O. terminatus ( SCHÜLKE & SMETANA 2015) . Hence, O. terminatus is indicated for Crete in recent catalogues (e.g., SCHÜLKE & SMETANA 2015). According to HORN et al. (1990), the Pic collection is deposited in the natural history museum in Paris. Thus, owing to the current restrictive loan policy of this museum, the type material is inaccessible for scientific study.
The type material of O. terminatus , a species described from Angola, was recently revised by ASSING (2019b). This revision revealed that, as was to be expected, O. terminatus is not conspecific with other Oedichirus species examined from the southern West Palaearctic region, so that the previously established synonymy with O. rubronotatus is most likely incorrect.
The original description of O. dimidiatus is based on two syntypes from “Zentral-Asien: Baldschuan” and “Kleinasien (Adana)” ( REITTER 1906). BERNHAUER (1906) noted that the name was preoccupied by O. dimidiatus EPPELSHEIM, 1890 and replaced it with the nomen novum O. reitteri . This species has been recorded from Turkey, Cyprus, Tajikistan, and Afghanistan.
MEYBOHM (2009) discovered that the type locality “Crête” in PIC (1903) does not refer to the Greek island Crete, but to a locality in the environs of Fethiye in the province Muğla, Southwest Turkey. Only two Oedichirus species have been recorded from Turkey, the macropterous O. reitteri and the micropterous O. simoni EPPELSHEIM, 1889 . Of these, O. rubronotatus can only be conspecific with O. reitteri for several reasons. PIC (1903) states that the elytra are “largement marqués de roux à l’extrémité” (which is the case also in O. reitteri ) and since he attributes O. rubronotatus to O. terminatus , it can be inferred that it is winged. Oedichirus simoni , however, has completely blackish (or blackish-blue) elytra, is micropterous, and its distribution is confined to the Middle East (from central southern Turkey across Lebanon to Israel). Species of Oedichirus have never been recorded from Crete, despite extensive collecting activity.
These observations all lead to the conclusion that O. reitteri is in fact conspccific with, and consequently a junior synonym of, O. rubronotatus .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Oedichirus rubronotatus PIC, 1903
Assing, Volker 2019 |
Oedichirus reitteri
BERNHAUER, M. 1908: 33 |
Oedichirus dimidiatus
REITTER, E. 1906: 263 |
Oedichirus terminatus var. rubronotatus
PIC, M. 1903: 145 |