Notodelphyopsisfalcifera Schellenberg, 1922
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.4.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5661663 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487CB-EF1E-3A7A-FF4D-FE10FA85F813 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Notodelphyopsisfalcifera Schellenberg, 1922 |
status |
|
Notodelphyopsisfalcifera Schellenberg, 1922
( Figs. 51 View FIGURE 51 , 52 View FIGURE 52 )
Material examined. 1 ♀ (dissected and figured) from Ascidia depressiuscula Heller, 1878 , Gulf of Manaar India.
Supplementary description of female. Body ( Fig. 51A, B View FIGURE 51 ) narrow, dorsoventrally depressed and arched ventrally. Bodylength 2.43 mm. Cephalosome with angular posterolateral corners and concave posterior margin; widerthan first 3 pedigerous somites. First to third pedigerous somites broader posteriorly. Brood pouch elongatedoval, 930×590 μm, longer than preceding part of prosome, and widest in middle; fifth pedigerous somite completely fused with brood pouch. Free urosome ( Fig. 51C View FIGURE 51 ) consisting of genital double-somite and 3- segmented abdomen: genital double-somite 114×175 μm; freeabdominalsomites 80×134, 91×127, and 80×118 μm, respectively. Caudalramus ( Fig. 51C View FIGURE 51 ) elongate, about 12 timeslongerthan wide (500×41 μm), gradually narrowing distally; armed with 6 small setae, all setae shorter than width of ramus; proximal outer lateral seta located at 30% of ramus length.
Coxa | Basis | Exopod | Endopod | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Leg 1 | 0-1 | 1-I | I-0; I-1; III, 1, 4 | 0-1; 0-1; 1, 2, 3 |
Leg 2 | 0-0 | 1-0 | I-0: I-1; III, I, 5 | 0-1; 0-2; 1, 2, 3 |
Leg 3 | 0-1 | 1-0 | I-0: I-1; III, I, 5 | 0-1; 0-2; 1, 2, 3 |
Leg 4 | 0-1 | 1-0 | I-0; I-1; III, I, 5 | 0-1; 0-2; 1, 2, 2 |
Rostrum( Fig.51D View FIGURE 51 )clearlydefinedfromcephalosome, spatulate, broadened in distal third, 78×86 μm. Antennule long and slender, 7-segmented, reaching to posterior margin of third pedigeroussomite when extended; seventh segment subdivided distally by indistinct suture line; armatureformula 3, 17, 6, 4, 4, 2, and 11+aesthetasc; all setae small and naked. Antenna ( Fig. 51F View FIGURE 51 ) 3-segmented: coxa short and unarmed; allobasis slightly inflated in middle with 2 unequal, pinnate setae representing exopod on outer margin; longer seta as long as free endopodal segment, shorter seta about half as long; free endopodal segment slightly shorter and narrower than basis, 82×19 μm, armed with 8 setae plus terminal claw more than half length of segment.
Labrum hirsute distally, with straight posterior margin and small posteromedian lobe. Mandible ( Fig. 51G View FIGURE 51 ) with 5 teeth and 2 small setae on coxal gnathobase, 2 small spinules on distal margin near base of distalmost tooth; basis with 1 seta on medial margin and scattered setules on ventral surface; exopod unsegmented with 5 setae, distal 2 setae distinctly larger (about twice length of other 3); endopod with 2 and 8 setae on first and second segments, respectively. Paragnath ( Fig. 52A View FIGURE 52 ) as small lobe bearing rounded protuberance at outer distal corner and dense setules on medial surface. Maxillule ( Fig. 51H View FIGURE 51 ) with 9 setae on arthrite, 1 on coxal endite, 2 on coxal epipodite, and 1 small proximal and 2 longer distalsetae onmedial margin of basis; exopod with 4 setae distally; endopod 2-segmented with 2 setae on first segment and 3 setaeon second. Maxilla ( Fig. 52B View FIGURE 52 ) 5-segmented; with 9 enditic setae on syncoxa (arranged as 3, 1, 2, 3), 3 on basis, and 1, 1, and 3 on first to third endopodal segments. Maxilliped ( Fig. 51I View FIGURE 51 ) 3-segmented, armedwith 9, 0, and 2 setae on first to third segments, respectively; articulation incomplete between second and third segments.
Legs 1–4 with 3-segmented rami. All legs lacking inner seta on first exopodal segment. Inner coxal seta large inleg 1 ( Fig. 52C View FIGURE 52 ), absentin leg 2 ( Fig. 52D View FIGURE 52 ), and small in legs 3 and 4 ( Fig. 52E View FIGURE 52 ). Outer seta on basis large and pinnate in leg 1, but small and naked in legs 2–4. Inner distal spine on basis of leg 1 longer than first endopodal segment, 65 μm long. Exopod of leg 1 strongly curved, first segment broadened distally. Outer spines on first and second exopodal segments of legs 2–4 strong, curved outwards, claw-like. Inner setaeon exopods and endopods of legs 2–4 short and naked. Third exopodal segment of leg 4 characteristically armed with 4 spines and 5 setae as in legs 2 and 3. Armature formula for legs 1–4 as follows:
Leg 5 ( Fig. 52F View FIGURE 52 ) represented by 2 small papillae, each tipped with 1 small seta.
Male. Not found.
Remarks. The presence of nine setal elements (III, I, 5) on the third exopodal segment of leg 4 is very unusual for notodelphyids. Even the two new basal genera Bathynotodelphys gen. nov. and Pronotodelphys gen. nov. erected in the present account (above) possess a maximum of eight elements (II, I, 5) on this segment, and this maximum is shared with Notodelphys and Paranotodelphys . The absence of an inner coxal seta on leg 2 only is also extremely unusual in copepods. When setae are lost along a leg series, the loss tends to follow an anterior to posterior, or a posterior to anterior sequence. The absence of this seta in leg 2 while it is present in legs 1, 3 and 4 requires confirmation.
The known hosts of this Indo-Pacific species include thetype host, Ascidia gemmata Sluiter, 1895 in Australia ( Schellenberg, 1922), A. zara Oka, 1935 and Ciona intestinalis in Japan ( Ooishi, 1962), and Phallusia nigra Savigny, 1816 in Korea ( Kim, 2012). Here we add Ascidia depressiuscula from India as a new host record.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
SubPhylum |
Tunicata |
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |