Microleptes chiani Ranjith & Humala, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/jhr.97.131822 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:60FBA642-B425-40B8-8718-614C4751CAF4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14226086 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C9D273CA-6CF5-45BF-8E86-3EB1634BF6DB |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:C9D273CA-6CF5-45BF-8E86-3EB1634BF6DB |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Microleptes chiani Ranjith & Humala |
status |
sp. nov. |
Microleptes chiani Ranjith & Humala sp. nov.
Figs 1 View Figure 1 , 2 View Figure 2
Material examined.
Holotype • female, India: Tamil Nadu, Kalakad Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve (KMTR), tropical wet evergreen forest, understorey, Malaise trap, 5.x.2008, coll. Priyadarsanan, D. R. ( ZSIK) Regd. No. ZSI/WGRC/IR/INV.27406 .
Description.
Holotype, female. Body length 6.2 mm, fore wing length 3.7 mm.
Head. Head 1.6 × as wide as long in anterior view (Fig. 1 B View Figure 1 ) and 1.4 × as wide as long in dorsal view (Fig. 1 C View Figure 1 ); face flat, punctate, elevated anteriorly below antennal sockets, setose, 1.7 × as wide as long (Fig. 1 A, B, D View Figure 1 ); clypeus strongly transverse, smooth, with lower margin slightly convex (Fig. 1 B View Figure 1 ); tentorial pits transverse (Fig. 1 B View Figure 1 ); malar space strongly reduced, 0.3 × basal width of mandible (Fig. 1 B, C View Figure 1 ); mandible broad with single broad tooth (Fig. 1 B View Figure 1 ); temple smooth, setose (Fig. 1 D View Figure 1 ); frons and vertex smooth and sparsely setose (Fig. 1 C View Figure 1 ); eye glabrous, 1.5 × as long as temple in dorsal view (Fig. 1 B – D View Figure 1 ); OOL: diameter of lateral ocellus: POL = 1.4: 1.0: 1.2; antenna with 14 flagellomeres; scape subcylindrical, pedicel bulb-shaped (Fig. 1 B, D View Figure 1 ); medial flagellomeres strongly transverse (Fig. 1 A View Figure 1 ); first flagellomere 2.0 × as long as second flagellomere, 1.3 × as long as wide; second flagellomere 0.6 × as long as wide.
Mesosoma. Mesosoma 1.8 × as long as high (Fig. 1 F View Figure 1 ); dorsal part of pronotum rugose-punctate medially, transversely wrinkled posteriorly (Fig. 1 E View Figure 1 ), pronotum laterally smooth and polished (Fig. 1 F View Figure 1 ); mesoscutum flat in lateral view, punctate, setose with a pair of elongate pits postero-laterally (Fig. 1 F View Figure 1 ); notaulus present anteriorly (Fig. 1 E View Figure 1 ); scuto-scutellar groove smooth without wrinkles (Fig. 1 E View Figure 1 ); scutellum smooth, setose (Fig. 1 E View Figure 1 ); mesopleuron smooth, setose (Fig. 1 F View Figure 1 ); mesopleural furrow widely crenulated (Fig. 1 F View Figure 1 ); epicnemial carina present, joining with subtegular ridge and forming a smooth continuous groove anteriorly (Fig. 1 F View Figure 1 ); metapleuron entirely rugulose, sparsely setose, sternaulus absent (Fig. 1 F View Figure 1 ); propodeum rugulose, area superomedia smooth medially, faintly crenulated postero-laterally, slightly narrowing anteriorly, parallel-sided posteriorly; costula present (Fig. 2 A View Figure 2 ); posterior transverse carina present, area dentipara slightly longer than wide, smooth medially; rest rugulose; pleural carina complete (Fig. 2 A View Figure 2 ).
Legs. Femora slender (Fig. 1 A View Figure 1 ); hind coxa smooth (Figs 1 A View Figure 1 , 2 C View Figure 2 ); hind femur 2.5 × as long as wide; hind tibia 3.3 × as long as wide; hind basitarsus 3.8 × as long as wide.
Wings. Wings hyaline (Fig. 2 B View Figure 2 ); pterostigma 2.8 × as long as wide; fore wing vein 2 r & RS joining to pterostigma before its middle, 1.1 × as long as 2 rs-m; vein 2 rs-m 2.5 × as long as M between 2 rs-m and 2 m-cu; and 0.9 × as long as 2 mc-u; vein 1 cu-a slightly postfurcal (Fig. 2 B View Figure 2 ); hind wing with nervellus (vein CU) intercepted in middle.
Metasoma. First tergite faintly sculptured medially, setose with indistinct dorsal carina, 2.3 × as long as its maximum width, spiracle situated at middle of tergite (Fig. 2 C, D View Figure 2 ); second tergite with distinct thyridium, smooth, setose, 1.1 × as long as wide posteriorly (Fig. 2 D View Figure 2 ); third tergite smooth, setose, as long as wide posteriorly (Fig. 2 D View Figure 2 ); tergites 4–7 smooth, setose (Fig. 2 D View Figure 2 ); hypopygium straight posteriorly; ovipositor hardly exposed, sheath apically setose, 0.1 × as long as hind tibia (Fig. 2 C View Figure 2 ).
Colour. Body predominantly black; antenna, mandible, tegula; pterostigma, wing veins, coxae and metasoma dark brown; maxillary and labial palps, legs (except coxae) yellow.
Male. Unknown.
Distribution.
India.
Etymology.
The new species is named after our field assistant Mr. Thamilselvan, whom we fondly call ‘ Chian’, who contributed much in establishing insect collection from the difficult terrain of KMTR.
Comparative diagnosis.
Apart from the differences given in the key, the new species differs from M. gowrishankari sp. nov. by the following characters: head 1.6 × as wide as long in anterior view (1.3 × in M. gowrishankari sp. nov.), face 1.7 × as wide as long (2.4 × in M. gowrishankari sp. nov.), epicnemial area with complete groove behind epicnemial carina (incomplete in M. gowrishankari sp. nov.) and area dentipara of propodeum longer than wide (wider than long in M. gowrishankari sp. nov.).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Ichneumonoidea |
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Microleptinae |
Genus |