Microchelonus aperon, Papp, Jenő, 2016
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.17109/AZH.62.3.217.2016 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BDD709-4048-8409-9CDC-FEFEFC66FCED |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Microchelonus aperon |
status |
sp. nov. |
Microchelonus aperon sp. n.
(Figs 26–34)
Materialexamined – Femaleholotype: CostaRica, SanJosé, Escazu, 8 February 1987, leg. G. E. Bohart. – Holotype is in good condition: glued direct to the pin by its right mesosomalside. HolotypeisdepositedinHNHM, Hym. Typ. No. 12228. Etymology – Thenewspeciesreceivedthelatinizedphantasyname “aperon”.
Description of the female holotype – Body 3 mm long. Antenna as long as body and with 16 antennomeres. Scapeinlateralviewsomewhatglobose, 2.5 timesaslongasbroadmedially (Fig. 26). Flagellumlong, firstflagellomeresixtimesandpenultimateflagellomere 2.6 timesas longasbroad (Fig. 26). – Headindorsalviewtransverse (Fig. 27), 1.8 timesasbroadaslong, eye 1.5 timeslongerthantemple, templerounded. OOL 1.2 timeslongerthanPOL (11:9). Eye inlateralview 1.8 timesashighaswide, genabeyondeyebroadeningventrallyandjustwider thaneye (17:16), genaposteriorlywithweaksubstriolation, otherwiseshinytopolished (Fig. 28 seearrows). Clypeus 1.4 timesaswidebelowashighmedially, itslowermarginconvex (cf. Fig. 48), finelyanddenselypunctate, subshiny. Facetransverselyrugulo-striolate; frons smoothandshinytopolished. Vertexandocciputdenselysubrugulose (Fig. 27).
Mesosomainlateralviewstout, 1.2 timesaslongashigh, scabrous, laterallobeof mesoscutumuneventosubrugulose. Notaulixdistinctanteriorly. Scutellumsmoothwith afewsubpunctures, shiny (Fig. 29). Hindfemur 3.5 timesaslongasbroadmedially (Fig. 30). Hindbasitarsusjustlongerthantarsomeres 2–4 combined.
Fore wing shorter than body, 2.5 mm long. Pterostigma 2.3 times as long as wide, issuing r from its middle, r almost as long as 3–SR (8:9), SR1 straight, 1–R1 0.8 times as long aspterostigma ( Fig. 32 View Figs 32–45 ).
Carapaceindorsalview 2.1 timesaslongasbroadposteriorly, anteriorlylongitudinallystriatedwithlittleanastomoses, interstriationsfinelycrenulated, posteriorlyrugorugulose ( Fig. 33 View Figs 32–45 ). Carapaceinlateralview 2.6 timesaslongashighposteriorly, apically deeplyrounded ( Fig. 34 seearrows View Figs 32–45 ). Carapaceapico-ventrallydeeplyincurved (Fig. 31). Ovipositorsheathshort, concealed.
Bodyblack. Scapeandpedicelyellowish, flagellumblack. Palpipaleyellow. Tegula darkbrown, parategulabrown. Forelegyellow, coxabrownish. Middlelegyellow, coxa blackish, femurproximallybrownish. Hindlegblackishtodarkbrown, trochantersand baseandapexoffemuryellow(ish). Wingshyaline, pterostigmabrown, veinsyellowto light brown.
Maleandhostunknown.
Distribution – Costa Rica.
Taxonomicposition – ThenewspeciesisneartotheNearcticspecies Microchelonusminimus (Cresson) viewingtheircommonfeatures: shortcorporal length (atmost 3 mmlong), smoothscutellum, headindorsalviewsomewhat lesstransverse, 1.8–1.9 timesasbroadaslong (Figs 27, 317); cylindricformof
carapaceindorsalviewandblackcolourofbody. Thedistinctionbetween themiskeyed:
1 (2) Forewing: Pterostigmaslightlywider, 2.3 timesaslongaswideandissuing r fromitsmiddle, 1–R1 long, 0.75 ttimesaslongaspterostigma ( Fig. 32 seearrows View Figs 32–45 ). Eyeindorsalview 1.5 timeslongerthantemple, temple slightlymorerounded (Fig. 27). Hindfemurthin, 3.5 timesaslongas broad (Fig. 30). Carapaceinlateralviewmoderatelyrisingposteriorly, apicallydeeplyincurved ( Fig. 34 seearrows View Figs 32–45 ). Forelegyellow. f: 3 mm. – Costa Rica M. aperon sp. n.
2 (1) Forewing: Pterostigmalesswide, 2.5 timesaslongaswideandissuing r distallyfromitsmiddle, 1– R1 0.6 timesaslongaspterostigma (Fig. 319). Eyeindorsalviewslightlylongerthantemple (17:15), templeslightly lessrounded (Fig. 317). Hindfemurthick, 2.5 timesaslongasbroad (cf. Fig. 300). Carapaceinlateralviewhardlyrisingposteriorly , apically perpendicularlytruncate (Fig. 320 seearrows). Forelegdarkbrownto brownish. f: 2.6–2.7 mm. – USA: NewYork , Texas
Inthekeytothefemale Microchelonus species M. aperon runsto M. danzas
sp. n. and M. subplanus Papp , see couplets 44 (49) – 48 (47).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.