Megischus mexicanus Aguiar, 2006
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.2646037 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6261373 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/103887A9-1A5B-9F50-FEB9-F959D8CFFC12 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Megischus mexicanus Aguiar |
status |
sp. nov. |
Megischus mexicanus Aguiar , sp. n.
( Figs 9–16 View FIGURES 9–16 , 24 View FIGURES 23–25 , 87–95 View FIGURES 87–95 )
Etymology Named after the country of Mexico, as the most characteristic stephanid species of this region.
Description
FEMALE. Holotype specimen ( Figs 24 View FIGURES 23–25 , 87–91, 93, 95 View FIGURES 87–95 ). Body length 10.5 mm. Head: Antenna with 30 flagellomeres, f1 ventrally dilated, laterally flattened; f2 ventrally on central 0.3 perceptibly swollen; f3–6 very long and narrow, about 15 times as long as wide; f7 basal 0.3 cylindric, apical 0.7 somewhat widened; f8–25 as wide as f7 apex; f26–30 progressively shorter and smaller. Flagellomeres 1–6 corresponding to 0.35 of the flagellar length; width widening of apical portion of flagellum distinct, clearly dividing antennae in two major sections. Frons rugose approximately in zigzag, ventrally rugosity transverse, changing to dorsally oblique. Coronal tubercles well defined, hind tubercles mesal margin widely separated, ending at anterior margin of first interocellar carina. Vertex ( Fig. 87 View FIGURES 87–95 ) glabrous; two interocellar carina, first one strong, darkened, shaped as a square bracket (“[”), second weak, more irregular; main area densely transversely rugose, changing progressively from strong anteriorly to fine posteriorly; rugosity reaching occipital carina centrally, becoming very weak laterally, disappearing on temple. Gena polished; in dorsal view very weakly prominent; centrally and ventrally with sparse long pale hairs. Occipital carina ( Fig. 87 View FIGURES 87–95 ) narrow, sharp, translucent; in dorsal view deeply emarginate into vertex, semicircular; in posterior view weakly convergent ventrally, ending far from hypostomal carina, at a distance almost as long as length of scape.
Mesosoma: Pronotum ( Figs 88, 89 View FIGURES 87–95 ) apical margin weakly emarginate, narrowly reflexed upwards, sharp; colo long, centrolongitudinally weakly concave, generating a subtle, polished channel, its apex with a few transverse, weak, arched carinae; laterally, on each side, with 7 strong and strongly oblique carinae, converging towards semiannular; pronotal fold transverse, straight, narrow, very deep. Semiannular ( Figs 88, 89 View FIGURES 87–95 ) transversally crossed by thick rugosity, which becomes fine along posterior margin, centrolaterally, and on lateral lobe. Femoral impression ( Fig. 88 View FIGURES 87–95 ) distinct, moderately deep, transversally crossed by rugosity from semiannular; ventral area longitudinally rugulose. Prosternum apical flange strongly alutaceous, centrally weakly rugulose, basal half smooth, except marginally rugulose to rugose. Mesonotum from centraly strongly longitudinally rugose to laterally irregularly strongly rugose, median sulcus a weak straight groove, notaulus indistinct; axilla rugose as mesonotum; scutellum from laterally strongly longitudinally rugose to centrally areolaterugose, except apicocentrally alutaceous (similar to Fig. 92 View FIGURES 87–95 ). Mesopleuron with sparse long golden hairs; anteriorly, on pectus, with patch of fine white pilosity; laterally from dorsally coarsely to ventrally finely areolaterugose, also densely microareolate inside areolae; centroposteriorly with patch of fine white pilosity; pleural sulcus entirely strongly crenulate. Mesopseudosternum distinctly alutaceous; discrimen narrow, delimited by closely aligned foveolae. Crenulate sulcus ( Figs 90, 93 View FIGURES 87–95 , in part) deep and wide, well isolated from propodeum. Propodeum ( Fig. 90 View FIGURES 87–95 ) strongly areolaterugose, flank and area behind pleuropropodeal fovea alutaceous and shiny; spiracular groove indistinct ( Fig. 90 View FIGURES 87–95 ); spiracular carina faintly indicated by convergence of rugosity ( Figs 90, 93 View FIGURES 87–95 ); parapetiolar depression indicated as largest areola near petiolar foramen, polished inside. Metapleuron ( Figs 90, 93 View FIGURES 87–95 ) strongly areolaterugose, finer anteriorly; anterior half dorsally with large patch of long, dense, parallel, ventrally decumbent white pilosity; ventral margin approximately straight, with very weak basal lobe. Pleuropropodeal and metapleural foveae deep; both foveae and interfoveolar area polished; pleural sulcus ( Fig. 93 View FIGURES 87–95 ) fully, very regularly and strongly crenulate; anterior margin of interfoveolar area straight ( Fig. 93 View FIGURES 87–95 ); postfoveolar area alutaceous. Hind coxa laterally densely microareolate, also with rugosity associated to its long, sparse hairs, particularly at base; dorsally transversely strigate; mesally flattened, densely and mostly transversely finely strigate and microareolate (as in Fig. 94 View FIGURES 87–95 ). Fore wing vein M+Cu with 6 erect, equidistant setae grouped at apex, ending at point of conexion with vein 1M; vein (Rs+M)b about 7 times longer than centrally wide; vein 21A tubular only on its basal 0.18, otherwise absent, cell 2Cu mostly open posteriorly; veins 2Cua and 2Cub entirely nebulous.
Metasoma: Petiole basal end rugulose, with a few longitudinal wrinkles, changing to coarsely microfoveolate and then progressively to finely and delicately microareolate towards apex, including ventrally; dorsoapical margin polished; T3 (2 nd metasomal) finely but conspicuously longitudinally alutaceous; T4 very finely transversely strigulatealutaceous; T5–7 transversely microscopically strigulate; T8 coarsely alutaceous. In full lateral view, metasoma with fine matte texture due to its generalized fine and dense sculpture pattern.
Color. Entirely light colored ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 23–25 ), from brownish yellow (255,195,075) on head and pronotum to reddish brown (191,102,028) on mesopleuron. Apex of mandible, apex of coronal tubercles, longitudinal walls of crenulate sulcus and at articulation of hind coxa with metapleuron, dark brown. Hind leg reddish brown somewhat lighter than mesopleuron, compressed center of tibia and tarsi lightly colored, yellowish. Ovipositor reddish brown; ovipositor sheath with four major color sections ( Fig. 95 View FIGURES 87–95 ) its basal 0.30 yellowish brown, next 0.36 dark brown, next 0.17 a subapical white band, followed by apical 0.17 dark brown, except the very apex (apical 0.04) black. Wing membrane light amber, veins brown.
Morphological variation in females. Range of biometric values in Table 1. All specimens very similar, but mesonotal rugosity, including scutellum, can be considerably coarser and more irregular than observed in the holotype, the median sulcus practically disappearing in this case.
MALE. Unknown.
Comments
This is the most typical Mexican stephanid, and one of the most characteristic species of the family. The pronotal shape and sculpture ( Figs 88, 89 View FIGURES 87–95 ), particularly the narrow and transverse pronotal fold ( Fig. 88 View FIGURES 87–95 ), the extremely coarse sculpture of the mesonotum, including the scutellum ( Fig. 92 View FIGURES 87–95 ), and the four color areas of the ovipositor sheath ( Fig. 95 View FIGURES 87–95 ) form an unique combination, making this species very easy to recognize. The following features can further aid its recognition: body entirely lightly colored ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 23–25 ), a long fore wing vein (Rs+M)b, and metapleuron dorso anteriorly with a white tuft of long, white, “combed” hairs ( Figs 90, 93 View FIGURES 87–95 ). The four areas of color on the ovipositor valve also occurs in a similar way on a few specimens of M. texanus and M. celaenocephalus .
Distribution Mexico.
Material examined
Four females. Holotype ♀ ODAC “ Mexico, Jalisco, Est. Biol. Chamela , 17X1996, R. L. Westcott. OSUC22880 View Materials .” Left ovipositor sheath basally broken, but glued on place; otherwise complete, well preserved. Paratypes: ♀ EBCC “ Mexico, Jalisco, Chamela , fecha 16VII85, R. Ayala, s./. OSUC22877 View Materials .” ♀ EBCC “ Mexico, Jalisco, Est. Biol. Chamela , 8 X1991, R. L. Westcott. OSUC22879 View Materials .” ♀ EBCC “ Mexico, Jalisco, Est. Biología Chamela , 2VII1995, R. L. Westcott. OSUC22878 View Materials .”
EBCC |
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Estacion de Biologia "Chamela" |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |