Mecolepis trispinosus

Das, Sunandan, Campbell, Patrick D., Deuti, Kaushik, Bag, Probhat & Raha, Sujoy, 2019, A contribution to the systematics of Salea anamallayana (Beddome, 1878) and S. horsfieldii Gray, 1845 (Squamata: Agamidae: Draconinae), Zootaxa 4563 (3), pp. 563-583 : 570

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4563.3.9

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:16A92AEA-99BD-415A-8F4A-A9A73DEDFCA

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5943012

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/194AA70F-FFD9-B45E-38D8-FEF0AA99FE98

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Mecolepis trispinosus
status

 

Sytematic status of Mecolepis trispinosus , M. hirsutus and M. sulcatus

Duméril described three new lizard species, namely Mecolepis trispinosus , M. hirsutus and M. sulcatus in 1851 which were subsequently synonymized with Salea horsfieldii by Günther (1864). From the original description of Duméril (1851) and plates published with a later contribution by the same author ( Duméril 1856), M. trispinosus and M. hirsutus appears to match well with males of S. horsfieldii while M. sulcatus seems to be a good match to female S. horsfieldii . The same conclusions were made by Günther (1864). The type locality of M. trispinosus and M. sulcatus was given by Duméril (1851) as ‘Monts Nilgherry (Indes orient.)’ (Nilgiri hills, India) which is the range of S. horsfieldii. The collection locality of the two syntypes of M. hirsutus, ‘Bengale’, corresponds to West Bengal of north India and Bangladesh and therefore seems to be wrong in all probability. Though the necessity of re-examination of those specimens cannot be negated entirely, we feel that Günther’s decision of relegating them to the synonymy of S. horsfieldii was absolutely correct.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Squamata

Family

Agamidae

Genus

Mecolepis

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF