Mazax ramirezi Rubio & Danişman, 2014
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.968.2731 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C4CDECB3-B960-4AB5-819F-7464D785F5F4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14188888 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/262B87B8-ED49-FFA4-CF07-FB4DFD46FC8B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Mazax ramirezi Rubio & Danişman, 2014 |
status |
|
Mazax ramirezi Rubio & Danişman, 2014 View in CoL
Mazax ramirezi Rubio & Danişman, 2014: 1185 View in CoL , figs 1a–f, 2a–d, 3a–f, 4a–g, 5a–f.
Diagnosis
Males of M. ramirezi resemble those of M. acanthaspis comb. nov. by having the carapace with a thoracic groove and feathery hairs, but differ by the tibia I ventral spination being 4-4 (5- 4 in M. acanthaspis ) and by the absence of a dorsal projection on the embolus ( Fig. 13G–H View Fig ) (present in M. acanthaspis ). Females resemble those of M. acanthaspis by the lung-shaped ST II, but differ by having a tibia I ventral spination of 5-4 ( Fig. 12D View Fig ) (5- 5 in M. acanthaspis ), ST II with the proximal region wider than the distal region ( Fig. 12H View Fig ) (distal region of the same width as the proximal in M. acanthaspis ), and by having a twisted CD ( Fig. 12H View Fig ) (nearly straight in M. acanthaspis ).
Type material
Holotype ARGENTINA • ♀; Buenos Aires Province, Campana, Reserva Natural Otamendi ; [34°13.649′ S, 58°53.916′ W]; elev. 22 m; 27 Dec. 1997; B. Fuentes and O. Di Iorio leg.; MACN-Ar 30732 (examined). GoogleMaps
Paratypes ARGENTINA • 1 ♂; same locality as for holotype; 10 Jan. 1998; MACN-Ar 30733 (examined) GoogleMaps • 2 ♀♀; same locality as for holotype; 9 Jan. 1998; B. Fuentes leg.; MACN-Ar 30734 GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; same locality as for holotype; 30 Dec. 1997; B. Fuentes and O. Di Iorio leg.; MACN-Ar 30735 (examined) GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; same locality as for holotype; 1997; O. Di Iorio leg.; MACN-Ar 16720 GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; same locality as for holotype; 21 Feb. 1998; B. Fuentes leg.; MACN-Ar 30736 (examined) GoogleMaps .
Description
See Rubio & Danişman (2014: 1185).
Remarks
Rubio & Danişman (2014) described both males and females as having a 4-4 tibia I ventral spination, reporting no significant variation. However, upon examining the female holotype as well as the paratypes, only the male (MACN-Ar 30733) has 4-4 spines on the ventral surface of tibia I ( Fig. 13J View Fig ); the holotype (MACN-Ar 30732) has 5-4 ( Fig. 12D View Fig ). The other two female paratypes (MACN-Ar-30735 and MACN-Ar-30736) examined have 5-5 ventral spines on tibia I ( Fig. 12E–F View Fig ), Therefore, both M. ramirezi and M. spinosa display intraspecific variation regarding the tibia I spination. Additionally, it is possible to notice the atypical castianeirine RTA in this species ( Fig. 13G View Fig ).
Distribution
Known only from the type locality ( Fig. 20 View Fig ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Castianeirinae |
Genus |
Mazax ramirezi Rubio & Danişman, 2014
Silva-Junior, Cláudio J., Martínez, Leonel, Villarreal, Eduardo & Bonaldo, Alexandre B. 2024 |
Mazax ramirezi Rubio & Danişman, 2014: 1185
Rubio G. D. & Danisman T. 2014: 1185 |