Marphysa hongkongensa, Wang & Zhang & Qiu, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.6620/ZS.2018.57-48 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12859226 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/262987CA-5D35-FFAE-F9DC-7D8912A2DDDC |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Marphysa hongkongensa |
status |
sp. nov. |
Marphysa hongkongensa View in CoL n. sp.
( Figs. 1-4 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig , Tables 1-2)
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:B0F18CCD-A482-4873-9525-1E6889F153EF
Materials examined: 24 type specimens collected from the intertidal zone of six beaches in Tolo Harbour, Hong Kong during 2015-2018 ( Table 1). Holotype: SWIMS-ANN-18-012. Paratypes: SWIMS-ANN-18-013-SWIMS-ANN-18-023; AM W.50930-AM W.50941.
Description: Live worms light green with iridescence; middle part with red branchial filaments on dorsal side ( Fig. 1A View Fig ). Preserved specimens beige. Complete specimens 23-147 mm long, 129-288 chaetigers; anterior prostomial margin to chaetiger 10 3.3-7.0 mm; chaetiger 10 (without parapodia) 2.2-5.3 mm wide ( Table 1).
Prostomium with two dorsoventrally flattened buccal lips and an anterior notch between them ( Fig. 1 View Fig B-D). Two palps and three antennae slender, attached on short palpiphore, arranged in a more or less curved line on the posterior margin of the prostomium. All five prostomial appendages approximately the same length, 1.5 times as long as prostomium ( Fig. 1 View Fig B-D). Peristomium approximately 3 times as long as segment 2, with notched anterior margin on ventral side ( Fig. 1C View Fig ).
Mandibles slightly longer than Mx I plus carriers ( Fig. 1 View Fig I-J). Mx I approximately 2.4 times as long as carriers. Mx II edge serrated, with teeth on left and right sides well matched. Mx III single, arched, slightly smaller than right Mx IV. Mx IV paired, both attached with basal lamellae; left Mx IV smaller than the right one. Mx V paired, flat, left one slightly smaller than right one ( Fig. 1 View Fig I-J). Maxillary formula: I = 1 + 1, II = 5-6 + 5-6, III = 7 + 0, IV = 4 + 8, V = 1 + 1.
Parapodia commencing from segment 3 ( Fig. 1 View Fig B-D). First parapodia located below the middle line of body wall, but gradually positioned dorsally in following segments ( Fig. 1 View Fig D-F). Notopodial cirri tapering, approximately as along as neuropodial cirri, longer than acicular lobes in anterior chaetigers, and similar in length with acicular lobes in posterior chaetigers ( Fig. 2 View Fig ). Neuropodial cirri conical, similar in size with notopodial cirri in first few chaetigers, but inflated in middle and posterior chaetigers ( Fig. 2 View Fig ).
Branchiae pectinate, commencing from anterior (15th-35th chaetiger) to near end. Branchiae single filament in anterior parapodia, pectinate with up to 5-10 filaments in middle parapodia ( Fig. 2B View Fig ), reducing to 1 in last several chaetigers.
Aciculae black with paler tip, approximately three per parapodia in anterior chaetigers, two per parapodia in middle chaetigers, and one per parapodia in posterior chaetigers. Supraacicular chaetae with limbate capillaries and pectinates. Capillaries present from first chaetiger to near pygidium, numbering up to 20 in anterior chaetigers. Pectinate chaetae commencing from first few chaetigers to near end, four types: a) isodont with 8-15 fine and short teeth, lateral teeth longer and usually straight, plate symmetrical or slightly asymmetrical, distributed in anterior chaetigers, 1-3 per parapodia ( Fig. 3G, J View Fig ); b) isodont with 15-23 fine and short teeth, lateral teeth longer and usually incurved, plate asymmetrical, distributed from middle to posterior chaetigers, 1-7 per parapodia ( Fig. 3I, K View Fig , O-P); c) anodont with approximately 15 median teeth, teeth length approximately ¼-⅓ plate width, plate asymmetrical, distributed in posterior chaetigers, 1-3 per parapodia ( Fig. 3L, P View Fig ); d) anodont with 7-13 large teeth, three medial teeth larger or similar in size with adjacent teeth, teeth length approximately ½ of plate width, plate asymmetrical, distributed in posterior chaetigers, 1-2 per parapodia ( Fig. 3 View Fig M-P). Pectinates arranged in rows in posterior chaetigers, with asymmetrical short and fine-toothed isodonts (type b) in anterior two rows, median- and large-toothed anodonts in posterior row (types c and d); Median-toothed anodonts (type c) in near middle chaetigers (anterior part of posterior chaetigers), approximately three in posterior row and gradually replaced by 1-2 large-toothed anodonts (type d) in posterior chaetigers ( Fig. 3L View Fig , O-P).
Subacicular chaetae compound spinigers and subacicular hooks ( Fig. 2 View Fig D-F). Compound spinigers commencing from first chaetiger to near pygidium, with long, tapered blade bearing unilateral fine serration ( Fig. 3C, F View Fig ). Subacicular hooks amber in colour, commencing from anterior chaetiger (26th-58th) to near end and inferior to bundle of spinigers, one per parapodia; slightly thinner than aciculae; Most subacicular hooks unidentate, thin and bidentate ones only present in last few parapodia ( Figs. 2 View Fig D-F; 3D-E).
Pygidium round, dorsally positioned, with two pairs of tapering pygidial cirri attached at the ventral edge, one pair 2 x and another pair half of pygidial diameter ( Fig. 1 View Fig G-H).
Variations in morphological characters: The complete specimens vary in length from 2.3 cm for 147 segments to 14.7 cm for 288 segments ( Table 1). The first pair of branchia occurs in chaetiger 15- 35, being more posterior in larger individuals. The maximum number of branchial filaments varied between 5-10. In complete specimens, the last pair of branchia is present in the last 8th-10th chaetiger with only one filament. Most of the specimens have a maxilla formula of Mx II = 5 + 5-6 (21 specimens) or Mx II = 6 + 5-6 (2 specimens); but in one specimen the left Mx II was broken and the right has five teeth. Subacicular hooks commence from parapodia 26-58, but all of these parapodia carry only one subacicular hook. Hooded bidentate subacicular hooks are only present on terminal posterior chaetigers, which explains why these hooks are missing in the several incomplete specimens.
Distinction from closely related species: Marphysa hongkongensa n. sp. resembles the other 25 Marphysa species belonging to Group B2 by having compound spinigers but no compound falcigers, and having branchiae in middle and posterior segments. This species can be distinguished from the type species M. sanguinea ( Montagu, 1813) by having unidentate and unhooded subacicular hook from anterior to middle chaetigers, hooded bidentate hook only present in terminal posterior chaetigers and subacicular limbate capillaries absent. Of the seven species that have been considered to be valid in Chinese waters ( Liu et al. 2017 2018), M. sinensis Monro, 1934 belongs to the Belli group (Group D1) by having both compound spinigers and falcigers. M. orientalis Treadwell, 1936 has pectinate chaetae from more posterior chaetigers (193th vs. 1st chaetiger), fewer teeth in Mx II (3 + 3 vs. 5-6 + 5-6), and a smaller maximal number of branchial filaments (3 vs. 5-10). M. multipectinata Liu, Hutchings & Sun, 2017 has pectinate chaetae first present from more posterior chaetigers (70th vs. 1st chaetiger), fewer teeth in Mx II (3 + 3 vs. 5-6 + 5-6), and a smaller maximal number of branchial filaments (3-5 vs. 5-10). M. tribranchiata Liu, Hutchings & Sun, 2017 has pectinate chaetae first present from more posterior chaetigers (20th vs. 1st chaetiger), fewer teeth in Mx II (4 + 4 vs. 5-6 + 5-6), and a smaller maximal number of branchial filaments (2-3 vs. 5-10). M. tripectinata Liu, Hutchings & Sun, 2017 has subacicular hook from more posterior chaetigers (170th vs. 26th- 58th chaetiger), and has only one pair of pygidial cirri. M. bulla Liu, Hutchings & Kupriyanova, 2018 has fewer teeth in Mx II (4 + 4 vs. 5-6 + 5-6), subacicular hooks from more posterior chaetigers (71th vs. 26th-58th chaetiger), more teeth (30-40 vs. 15-23) in posterior fine-toothed isodonts, and fewer teeth (3-5 vs. 7-13) in posterior large-toothed anodonts. M. maxidenticulata Liu, Hutchings & Kupriyanova, 2018 has smaller maximal number of branchial filaments (3 vs. 5-10), and fewer teeth (3-6 vs. 7-13) in posterior large-toothed anodonts.
Marphysa hongkongensa View in CoL n. sp. can also be distinguished from the other 18 species of Marphysa View in CoL of the Group B2 that were originally described from localities beyond Chinese waters. Nine species [i.e. M. acicularum Webster, 1884 View in CoL ( Molina-Acevedo & Carrera-Parra, 2015); M. brasiliensis ( Hansen, 1882) View in CoL ; M. elityeni Lewis & Karageorgopoulos, 2008 View in CoL ; M. fauchaldi Glasby & Hutchings, 2010 View in CoL ; M. gravelyi View in CoL Southern, 1921; M. kristiani Zanol, da Silva & Hutchings, 2016 View in CoL ; M. mullawa Hutchings & Karageorgopoulis, 2003 View in CoL ; M. schmardai Gravier, 1907 View in CoL and M. viridis Treadwell, 1917 View in CoL ( Molina-Acevedo & Carrera-Parra, 2015)] have bidentate subacicuar hook, but M. hongkongensa View in CoL n. sp. has unidentate subacicular hook. M. victori Lavesque, Daffe, Bonifácio & Hutchings, 2017 View in CoL has no subacicular hook. M. januarii ( Grube, 1881) View in CoL and M. teretiuscula ( Schmarda, 1861) View in CoL have a smaller maximal number of branchial filaments (4 vs. 5-10). M. borradailei Pillai, 1958 View in CoL ( Glasby and Hutchings, 2010) has a larger maximal number of branchial filaments (10- 20 vs. 5-10). Three species (i.e. M. macintoshi Crossland, 1903 View in CoL ; M. mangeri Augener, 1918 View in CoL and M. tamurai Okuda, 1934 View in CoL ) have an undivided prostomium but M. hongkongensa View in CoL n. sp. has a bilobed prostomium. M. sanguinea ( Montagu, 1813) View in CoL and M. furcellata Crossland, 1903 View in CoL have subacicular limbate capillaries but this type of chaetae are absent in M. hongkongensa View in CoL n. sp. M. simplex ( Langerhans, 1884) ( Crossland 1903) View in CoL has fewer teeth in Mx II than M. hongkongensa View in CoL n. sp. (3 + 3 vs. 5 + 5-6).
Etymology: The specific epithet hongkongensa refers to the type locality of Hong Kong.
Habitat: Lower intertidal zone on sandy shores.
Distribution: Currently only known from Tolo Harbour, Hong Kong. Given its common occurrence on several beaches in Tolo Harbour (as found in this study) and the wide presence of “ Marphysa sanguinea ” recorded from local sea shores ( Morton and Morton 1983), it is expected that this species is also distributed on other shores along the eastern coasts of Hong Kong.
Molecular analysis
Partial DNA sequences of COI (435bp) and 16S RNA (466bp) were used for phylogenetic analysis based on the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method ( Fig. 4 View Fig ). Results based on the two single genes showed that Marphysa species form a monophyletic clade; however, support for the clade is weak for both single genes (bootstrap values <65). The results of COI and 16S concatenated sequences are consistent with each single gene in that Marphysa species form a monophyletic clade, but the support value was higher (bootstrap values = 82). These results are in agreement with the results of Zanol et al. (2010 2014). Phylogenetic analysis placed M. hongkongensa n. sp. as sister to M. tripectinata Liu, Hutchings and Sun, 2017 based on the COI gene; and as sister to a clade consisting of M. victori Lavesque, Daffe, Bonifácio & Hutchings, 2017 and M. viridis Treadwell, 1917 based on 16S gene with low bootstrap values (bootstrap values <50). Nevertheless, there are much larger interspecific divergences in COI sequences (19.5%) and 16S sequences (12.1%) between M. hongkongensa n. sp. and the closest related Marphysa species than the intraspecific divergences (<1%) of both two genes in Marphysa species. These analyses, therefore, support M. hongkongensa n. sp. as a valid species.
Key to species in the Marphysa sanguinea View in CoL complex from Chinese waters
(modified after Liu et al. 2017)
1. Subacicular hooks present after chaetiger 70 .................. 2
1. Subacicular hooks present before chaetiger 60 ............... 3
2. Subacicular hooks present from posterior chaetigers, Mx II = 3 + 3, branchiae from chaetigers 35-45, up to 3 filaments; pectinates from chaetiger 193, posterior pectinate 3 types: asymmetrical isodont approximately 30 teeth, median teeth anodont 16 teeth, large-toothed anodont 4-5 teeth ............. .......................................................................... M. orientalis View in CoL
2. Subacicular hooks present from 170th chaetiger, Mx II = 5 + 5, branchiae from chaetiger 15-24, up to 6-8 filaments; Pectinates from first few chaetigers, four types, anterior isodonts approximately 10 teeth, posterior pectinates 3 types: fine-toothed isodont> 30 teeth, median teeth anodont 14-18 teeth, large-toothed anodont 5-7 teeth ........ ...................................................................... M. tripectinata View in CoL
2. Subacicular hooks present from approximately 71th chaetiger, Mx II = 4 + 4, branchiae from chaetiger 29-36, up to 5 filaments; pectinates from first few chaetigers, four types, anterior isodonts 13-17 teeth, posterior pectinates 3 types: fine-toothed isodont approximately 30-40 teeth, median-toothed anodont approximately 14 teeth, large-toothed anodonts 3-5 teeth, ventral cirri with a swollen base and a globular tip ................................................... M. bulla View in CoL
3. Subacicular hooks present after 20th chaetiger, pectinates present from first few chaetigers, 4 types ......................... 4
3. Subacicular hooks present from 20th chaetiger, pectinates present after 20th chaetiger, 3 types ................................ 5
4. Subacicular hooks present from chaetiger 25, Mx II = 4 + 6, branchiae from chaetiger 28, up to 3 filaments; anterior isodonts 10-12 teeth; posterior pectinates 3 types: fine-toothed isodont approximately 25 teeth, median-toothed anodont 14 teeth, large-toothed anodont 3-6 teeth ............. ............................................................... M. maxidenticulata View in CoL
4. Subacicular hooks present from 26 to 58 chaetigers, Mx II = 5 + 5-6, branchiae from chaetiger 14-35, up to 5-10 filaments, 1-3 anterior isodonts, 8-15 teeth, posterior pectinate 3 types: approximately 5 fine-toothed isodonts arranged in 2 rows, approximately 23 teeth; 1-2 median-toothed anodonts, approximately 15 teeth; 2-3 large-toothed anodonts, 7-13 teeth........ M. hongkongensa View in CoL n. sp.
5. Mx II = 4 + 4, branchiae present from chaetigers 16-26, up to 2-3 filaments; pectinate from approximately 20th chaetiger, anterior fine-toothed isodonts approximately 12 teeth, posterior pectinate 2 types: fine-toothed isodont approximately 17 teeth, median-toothed anodont 14 teeth, large-toothed anodont absent.................... M. tribranchiata View in CoL
5. Mx II = 3 + 3, branchiae present from chaetigers 29-32, up to 3-5 filaments; pectinate from approximately chaetiger 70, anterior fine-toothed isodonts absent; posterior pectinate 3 types: fine-toothed isodont approximately 12-16 teeth, median-toothed anodont 14 teeth, large-toothed anodont approximately 4 teeth .............................. M. multipectinata View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Marphysa hongkongensa
Wang, Zhi, Zhang, Yanjie & Qiu, Jian-Wen 2018 |
Marphysa hongkongensa
Wang & Zhang & Qiu 2018 |
M. hongkongensa
Wang & Zhang & Qiu 2018 |
M. hongkongensa
Wang & Zhang & Qiu 2018 |
M. hongkongensa
Wang & Zhang & Qiu 2018 |
M. hongkongensa
Wang & Zhang & Qiu 2018 |
M. victori Lavesque, Daffe, Bonifácio & Hutchings, 2017
Lavesque, Daffe, Bonifacio & Hutchings 2017 |
M. kristiani
Zanol, da Silva & Hutchings 2016 |
M. fauchaldi
Glasby & Hutchings 2010 |
M. elityeni
Lewis & Karageorgopoulos 2008 |
M. mullawa
Hutchings & Karageorgopoulis 2003 |
M. borradailei
Pillai 1958 |
M. tamurai
Okuda 1934 |
M. mangeri
Augener 1918 |
M. viridis
Treadwell 1917 |
M. schmardai
Gravier 1907 |
M. macintoshi
Crossland 1903 |
M. furcellata
Crossland 1903 |
M. simplex ( Langerhans, 1884 ) (
Crossland 1903 |
M. acicularum
Webster 1884 |
Marphysa
Quatrefages 1866 |