Maindronia bashagardensis, Smith & Molero-Baltanás & Jaberhashemi & Rafinejad, 2020
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3853/j.2201-4349.72.2020.1760 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E39C144E-8773-40E0-8855-15BED9363BFD |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038287BD-6958-371F-603B-10788A92F958 |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Maindronia bashagardensis |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Maindronia bashagardensis sp. nov. Smith & Molero-Baltanás
http://zoobank.org/NomenclaturalActs/ 2F101CAF-9940-4E93-9C0B-75EECCE185F4
Figs 2–41 View Figure 2 View Figure 3 View Figure 4 View Figure 5 View Figures 6–17 View Figures 18–22 View Figures 23–25 View Figures 26–36 View Figures 37–41
Holotype ♀ IRAN: Hormozgan Province, Bashagard County, Jakdan village, 26.4334°N 57.1747°E, 13.vi.2013, Seyed Aghil Jaberhashemi and colleague, collected on porcelain tiles inside rooms; K.541546 (head and nota), K.541546.001 (legs and sterna), K.541546.002 (abdominal segments I–VI), and K.541546.003 (abdominal segments VI–X and terminalia); in the Australian Museum, Sydney. Diagnosis. Distinguished from M. mascatensis by the presence of two combs on the inner process of coxites VIII (versus one), three combs on each coxite VII (versus two) and 4+4 combs on the face of urosternites III–VII (versus 3+3). Maindronia neotropicalis lacks dorsal chaetotaxy and M. beieri Schremmer, 1964 has only seven pairs of styli and the chaetotaxy appears to be less dense than in the new species.
Description
Appearance: Very large silverfish ( Fig. 6 View Figures 6–17 ), body elongate with parallel sides, dorsoventrally flattened, thorax only slightly wider than abdominal segment I, the following abdominal segments remain about the same width up until the fifth segment after which they slowly taper posteriorly to about 80% the width of the thorax. Eyes almost black. Scales absent but some areas of dark pigmentation as described below.
Body size: H+B length 16.5 mm, thorax width 2.3 mm; antennae incomplete 16.9 mm (a little longer than H+B) and terminal filaments incomplete 11.0 mm (⅔ H+B).
Cuticle and pigmentation: Surface of body, flagellum, legs and styli with tessellated appearance with scattered small setae ( Fig. 7 View Figures 6–17 ), cuticle without tessellated appearance on pedicel and scape, palps, tail filaments and ovipositor. Cuticular pigment blotchy, dark brown or deep purple. Pigment faded noticeably over several days after the specimen was mounted in Tendeiro medium. Antennae and terminal filaments without pigmentation. Head with pigment behind the eyes and along the lateral margins, with a weakly pigmented star-shaped region over much of the vertex, 3+3 distinct but small dark pigment patches occur on either side of the groove between the anterior bushes of macrochaetae and out towards the lateral margins as well as patches along the posterior margin of the vertex; a line of pigment on the dorsal surface of the mandibles; maxillary palp mostly without pigment except for the light pigmentation along the dorsal surface of the 3rd article; labial palp with line of purple pigment along the outer margin of the penultimate article. Pronotum with light pigment patchily over disk, becoming denser towards the anterolateral margins; meso- and meta-nota with very little pigment being only visible in the anterolateral region. Prosternum with conspicuous rectangular area of dark pigment posterior to the submedial combs of macrochaetae (except for between the combs), meso- and meta-sterna with oblique lines of pigment arising just posterior to the submedial combs angled towards the mid-line; pro- and mesosternum also with transverse line of dark pigment adjacent to the following segment. Coxa of all legs with blotchy purple pigment on inner anterior corners, trochanter without pigment, femora and tibia of all legs with pigment along the ventral line of strong macrochaetae and over much of dorsal surface. All urotergites pigmented in middle 50% with the pigment becoming darker towards the posterior margin of each urotergite, the degree of pigmentation of each segment is progressively stronger towards the posterior end; urotergite X darker especially along posterior margin, styli pigmented or more strongly sclerotized apically; ovipositor with light pigment along the mid-ventral surface of the anterior gonapophyses.
Macrochaetae: Smooth, apically bifid but bifurcations distinctly truncate even in smaller setae of antennae ( Figs 2 View Figure 2 , 8 View Figures 6–17 ), some appear to be apically trifurcate while others have a double bifurcation ( Fig. 3 View Figure 3 ) and others quite flattened apically although still bifurcate; light brown in colour. Some carrot-shaped macrochaetae on legs ( Fig. 9 View Figures 6–17 ). Many smaller setae or chaetic sensilla ( Fig. 2 View Figure 2 ) also apically bifurcated but some, especially on the maxillary palp, almost pointed (slightly truncated apically under high magnification). Other setae are simple and lack bifurcation or apical truncation. Macrochaetae are present on the terminal filaments, the pedicel and scape but not on the flagellum of the antennae.
Head: Longer than wide, very flattened and prognathous with the antennal bases positioned well forward ( Fig. 10 View Figures 6–17 ); chaetotaxy well developed, anterolateral corners of frons with 1+1 bushes and a groove between them, the sides of which showed dark pigment when the specimen was in alcohol but which completely faded when slide mounted; behind these anterior groups there is a small gap before a short lateral group about two macrochaetae wide with 1+1 (or 1+2) isolated macrochaetae behind them (possibly homologous with the peri-antennal group of Lepismatidae ) followed by a much longer gap to a small group of macrochaeta at the anterior corner of the eyes and another group on the margin behind the eyes and a stout carrot-shaped macrochaetae posterolaterally. Disc of head with scattered cilia. Clypeus difficult to see in slide mounted material but appears to have 1+1 proximal rows of strong macrochaetae, longer than those on the frons. Labrum with numerous long macrochaetae, two long thin setae and several cilia. Eyes dark, not prominent, composed of 12 ommatidia. — Antennae ( Figs 4 View Figure 4 , 5 View Figure 5 , 11, 12 View Figures 6–17 ) quite long and densely covered in apically bifurcate setae, scape longer than wide with subapical ring as well as four groups of strong setae in shorter (two setae) or longer (several setae) rows across the dorsal outer face, pedicel about as long as wide and only about half the length of the scape, with subapical ring of shorter strong setae and some very long macrochaetae. Limits between annuli of the flagellum are in some cases difficult to discern with a light microscope, but more evident with SEM, where they can be identified by the wrinkled integument ( Fig. 5 View Figure 5 ). Six basal annuli of the flagellum each with one ring of setae and several trichobothria; in the first one, some trichobothria are inserted below the ring of setae showing the zone where the basal growth of the antennal flagellum originates. From the seventh annulus, each one has two rings of setae, but in the section between the 10th and the 30th some annuli have three rings, and in the apical part (more distal than the 100th annulus) the annuli bear only one ring of setae. When more than one ring appears in an annulus, they are closely positioned in the basal part of the antenna and more separated in the apical part. All basal annuli have trichobothria. The first annulus without these sensilla is the 14th. The number of annuli forming an interval increases towards the apex (three from annuli 26–28 and four from 44–47), to the point that most apical surviving intervals ( Fig. 12 View Figures 6–17 ) consist of 16 annuli. A high diversity of sensilla has been detected using the SEM; most of these are difficult to see with light microscopy, not only because of their small size, but also because of the similarity of some of these types with low magnification and the fact that the high density of setae, all somewhat laid flat on the slide, makes examination of these structures difficult. Trichoid sensilla (cilia) are visible from the fifth annulus. A type of thin seta with bent base is present from the fourth annulus. At least four types of basiconic sensilla are present; three of them can be attributed to the types A, B and C described by Adel (1984). Some other types of sensilla are present, such as campaniform (usually associated with T-annuli) and dome-like sensilla that can considered as equivalent to coeloconic type. Rosette-like structures, like those described by Matushkina (2010), have also been observed in several annuli. The distribution pattern of these types of sensilla is very regular along the antenna. For example, a pair basiconic A - basiconic C is usually present in the same position of the antenna in each interval below the T-annulus (in the penultimate annulus of the interval when the interval consists of three or four annuli). — Mandibles ( Figs 13, 14 View Figures 6–17 ) quite large with a well-developed incisor region but lacking a molar region, a line of 11 shorter and six longer apically bifurcate setae along the distal ventral
limiting two consecutive annuli of the antennal flagellum.
margin proximal to the incisor region and a bush of 30+ macrochaetae externally. — Maxilla ( Figs 15, 16 View Figures 6–17 ) laterally quite prominent with several strong macrochaetae and cilia as in Fig. 15 View Figures 6–17 , with a very simple curved lacinia, which is a little longer than the slender galea, apex of galea without apical lobes, instead having a “chiselled-off” appearance like rodent teeth (on both left and right sides so probably not an injury), galea also with some stronger macrochaetae basally. Palp very long and slender, the apical article about 17 times longer than wide and similar in length to the penultimate article, basal article small with just a couple of bifurcated setae, second, third and fourth articles long with more numerous bifurcated setae and long cilia, especially around the distal end of each article, ultimate article quite thin, with three large papillae in the distal quarter, these resemble a large curved basiconic sensillum (type C of Adel, 1984) but with one or two apical papillae ( Fig. 16 View Figures 6–17 ). — Labium ( Figs 17 View Figures 6–17 , 18 View Figures 18–22 ) only very slightly longer than broad, postmentum very long with all setae confined to the distal half; prementum between palps with transverse row of cilia and setae, those laterally are bifurcated, paraglossae with oblique row of macrochaetae as well as a loose lateral bush of several macrochaetae and a row of weaker setae along the outer margin, apices of paraglossae and glossae with long cilia ( Fig. 18 View Figures 18–22 ); palps about the same length as labium, articles one to three with long bifurcated macrochaetae as illustrated ( Fig. 18 View Figures 18–22 ), apical article subrectangular, almost sausage-shaped and very wide being almost four times as wide as long, with a long anterior papilla of the aufgelöst type in the middle but becoming more compact towards each end, then something that resembles the 3+2 arrangement in many lepismatid genera although the two outer papillae in the more anterior row are also very long and the individual units of the papillae more compacted together; these papillae are fringed with a line of rod-like structures, the rest of the segment covered with numerous setae (some quite stout), no other specialized sensilla observed.
Thorax: Only slightly wider than head or abdomen, subparallel sides, the surface of all nota with scattered cilia, these being more numerous near the lateral margins. Pronotum ( Fig. 19 View Figures 18–22 ) only slightly wider than head (1.08) with slightly indented posterior margin; anterior margin without setal collar but with scattered cilia along the entire margin, lateral region of anterior margin with two groups of three macrochaetae on each side, lateral margin with a stout slightly carrot-shaped macrochaeta in the anterior corner, followed by a comb of three macrochaetae then an isolated trichobothrium slightly anterior of halfway (0.40 of total margin length along margin), followed by a comb of four or five macrochaetae, followed by another trichobothrium (0.62 along margin) followed by one or two presumably stout macrochaetae closer to the margin and an oblique comb of five macrochaetae, the trichobothria and the combs in the posterior half are much more distant from the margin than is usually observed in the Lepismatidae ; posterior margin glabrous. — Mesonotum ( Fig. 20 View Figures 18–22 ) also with numerous scattered cilia over the surface (not illustrated) with the most anterior comb consisting of five macrochaetae, the following comb of four macrochaetae followed by a trichobothrium (0.44 along margin), and another trichobothrium (0.52 along margin), followed by a comb of five macrochaetae, then two (presumably) carrot-shaped macrochaetae on the margin at close to the level of the oblique posterior combs, these combs consist of six macrochaetae which become progressively larger posteriorly; the posterior margin with a very pronounced concavity medially. — Metanotum ( Fig. 21 View Figures 18–22 ) similar to mesonotum, with three combs on each side with five, four and five macrochaetae, each posterolateral corner with only one marginal macrochaeta, oblique posterior combs of five macrochaetae ( Fig. 22 View Figures 18–22 ), the trichobothria are located 0.64 and 0.82 along margin. Combs and trichobothria of all nota without associated setae, cilia or setulae although some of the scattered cilia of the disc may lie close to the combs or trichobothria.
Presternum of prothorax ill-defined in slide material but glabrous ( Fig. 23 View Figures 23–25 ). — All thoracic sterna not free ( Figs 23–25 View Figures 23–25 ) with a large exposed area between the coxae, with 1+1 combs each of 6–10 macrochaetae adjacent to the precoxae.
Legs quite long ( Figs 23–25 View Figures 23–25 ), becoming progressively longer posteriorly with the tibia of PI only 0.64 the length of tibia of PIII and the tarsus of PI only half the length of the tarsus of PIII; tibia L/W ratio of legs PI 3.5, PII 3.3, PIII 4.1; tarsi L/W ratio PI 8.0, PII 8.6, PIII 13.7. — Precoxa of prothorax with a line of five macrochaetae, the most lateral being carrot-shaped as well as an isolated simple macrochaeta. — Coxae of all legs with several combs of up to ten macrochaetae along or near the lateral margin as well as some thicker isolated macrochaeta (three on PI, one on PIII), inner margin with three to six combs, the more proximal consisting of two combs close together, combs of up to thirteen macrochaetae as illustrated, with at least three strong and several smaller macrochaetae over the articulation with the trochanter. — Trochanter of all legs with two slender macrochaetae and one short carrot-shaped macrochaeta. — Femur with isolated stout macrochaetae along anterior margin proximally, then two or three similar macrochaetae about midway, distal quarter with two combs each of up to nine macrochaetae some of which are carrotshaped. Posterior margin of femur with up to three long carrot-shaped macrochaetae and a proximal comb. — Tibiae all with several stout carrot-shaped macrochaetae as well as mostly shorter, more slender, macrochaetae formed into numerous combs over the ventral face and anterior margin as illustrated, the carrot-shaped macrochaetae sometimes incorporated into the combs of thinner macrochaetae, apical spine with some small setae and a cilium. — Tarsus with four articles, the basal article on PI being about one third the length of the tarsus and two fifths on PIII, all tarsal articles with short carrot-shaped macrochaetae along the ventral surface and simple setae on the dorsal surface. — Pretarsus with long thick fairly straight outer claws that narrow and curve apically, medial empodial claw smooth and short.
Abdomen: Urotergite I ( Fig. 26 View Figures 26–36 ) with 4+4 combs of 2–5 macrochaetae each comb with and one or two cilia, as well as 1+1 carrot-shaped macrochaetae near the posterolateral corners. Urotergites II–III ( Figs 27, 28 View Figures 26–36 ) with 3+3 combs (missing the more anterolateral comb) as well as 1+1 carrot-shaped macrochaetae near the posterolateral corner; the redundant suture with the paratergites is vaguely visible on tergites IV–VIII ( Fig. 29 View Figures 26–36 ). Urotergites V–VIII with 4+4 combs as well as 1+1 carrot-shaped macrochaetae on the posterolateral corner. Urotergite IX ( Fig. 30 View Figures 26–36 ) with 3+3 posterior combs fairly close to the margin, the most lateral composed of two macrochaetae, the sublateral of 1–2 macrochaetae and the submedial of 1–2 macrochaetae, each comb with one or two cilia adjacent to the comb, when only one, this is usually lateral of the comb; medial region with irregular pigment — Urotergite X ( Fig. 31 View Figures 26–36 ) short, trapezoidal, with 1+1 submarginal combs of two macrochaetae on the apices and a single, carrot-shaped macrochaeta on the posterior margin adjacent to the combs, each comb associated with cilium lateral of the comb, the surface with a few scattered curved setulae, the medial area with pigment which is darker along the posterior margin, the posterior margin between the combs somewhat concave.
Urosternite I glabrous. Urosternite II ( Fig. 32 View Figures 26–36 ) with 1+1 submedial combs well anterior of the margin. Urosternites III with 3+3 combs (lacking the most lateral) ( Fig. 33 View Figures 26–36 ). Urosternites IV–VII ( Figs 34–36 View Figures 26–36 ) with 4+4 combs with two combs laterad of the styli and two mediad of the styli, the most lateral comb on II–VIII with 3–4 macrochaetae as well as a cilium laterad of the comb, the sublateral combs with 4–8 macrochaetae and rarely a cilium laterad of the comb, the lateral combs (mediad of the styli) with 7–12 thinner macrochaetae, the submedial combs with 8–10 thinner macrochaetae, often (but not always) with a small carrotshaped macrochaetae near the margin on either side of the stylet insertion and sometimes another laterad of the stylus. Coxites VIII in ♀ ( Figs 37, 38 View Figures 37–41 ) separated into two coxites each with three combs as well as five short carrot-shaped macrochaetae along the margins, one near the apex of the rounded outer process, two on either side of the rounded inner process and two more along the inner margin of the inner process; the lateral comb of 3–4 macrochaetae and a laterad cilium, the other two combs are at the base of the inner process, the comb adjacent to the stylus with 9–10 macrochaetae, the submedial combs of 7–8 macrochaetae.
Coxite IX in ♀ ( Figs 37, 39 View Figures 37–41 ) with a small lateral comb of three macrochaetae associated with a laterad cilium, and three combs quite close together on the internal process, the more lateral being slightly anterior to a smaller comb adjacent to the ovipositor and another smaller comb more posterior, apices of both inner and outer processes with one or two marginal, carrot-shaped macrochaetae.
Styli ( Fig. 37 View Figures 37–41 ) present in seven pairs i.e. on urosternites III–IX, those on IX being about 1½ times longer than those on VIII. All styli with terminal spines similar to that observed in the Nicoletiidae as well as several stout almost carrotshaped macrochaetae along the shaft of each stylus.
Ovipositor ( Figs 37, 40 View Figures 37–41 ) of primary type, moderately long (1.1 times HW), surpassing the apices of the styli by about twice their length, with 28–29 divisions, each division especially those apically with small conical setae .
Epiproct and paraprocts not strongly pigmented or sclerotized ( Fig. 41 View Figures 37–41 ), both appearing as very sharp processes over the base of the median dorsal appendage. — Cerci ( Fig. 41 View Figures 37–41 ) incomplete, basal division short, about as long as wide, with three rings of setae, macrochaetae and trichobothria, pronounced joint to next division; second division about three times longer than wide, with six rings of strong macrochaetae as well as secondary rings of smaller setae and trichobothria between them; third division similar but with only four rings of strong macrochaetae, setae, long trichoid sensilla and trichobothria as well as about thirteen secondary rings, this division subdivided by faint suture a bit beyond half way; following three divisions only half as long with only two rings containing stronger macrochaetae, as well as several secondary rings. — Median dorsal appendage ( Fig. 41 View Figures 37–41 ) incomplete (>0.17 H+B) with basal division a little longer than wide with about four rings of simple or apically slightly bifurcate setae as well as strong slightly bifurcate carrot-shaped macrochaetae on each side of the more distal rings, the joint between this and the following segment very prominent appearing almost as a separate and slightly wider segment, the second division much longer (about four times longer than wide) with six rings of stronger setae including the lateral carrot-shaped macrochaetae as well as four rings of smaller apically-bifurcate setae between the more distal rings of larger setae and several long trichobothria, again with a prominent joint between this and the following division, the third division of similar length and chaetotaxy but with three subtle suture lines, dividing the division into four subunits, the basal and the most distal each with one ring of strong macrochaetae, the middle two each with two rings of stronger seta, all subunits with additional rings of smaller setae and many long trichobothria.
Male unknown.
Biology. The specimen was collected on tiles within a home.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.