Kaloula discordia Poyarkov, Gorin, Bragin & Nguyen, 2024

Gorin, Vladislav A., Orlov, Nikolai L., Bragin, Andrey M., Pawangkhanant, Parinya, Milto, Konstantin D., Le, Dac Xuan, Nguyen, Tan Van, Dufresnes, Christophe, Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon & Poyarkov, Nikolay A., 2024, Phylogeographic pattern and taxonomic revision of the Kaloula baleata species complex (Amphibia, Anura, Microhylidae) with description of two new species from Indochina, Herpetozoa 37, pp. 391-420 : 391-420

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.3897/herpetozoa.37.e137394

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E97A128A-13B5-4781-8FEC-ADC5CB37AB45

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14396113

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0C2FCC48-DAC5-5A85-930E-B22B42429B23

treatment provided by

Herpetozoa by Pensoft

scientific name

Kaloula discordia Poyarkov, Gorin, Bragin & Nguyen
status

sp. nov.

Kaloula discordia Poyarkov, Gorin, Bragin & Nguyen sp. nov.

Figs 2 View Figure 2 , 4 View Figure 4 , 6 View Figure 6 , 7 View Figure 7 , 8 View Figure 8 , 9 C View Figure 9 , Tables 3 View Table 3 , 4 View Table 4

Chresonymy.

Kaloula baleata View in CoL [partim] — Orlov et al. (2002: 99); Nguyen et al. (2005: 43); Orlov and Ananjeva (2007: 148); Nguyen et al. (2009: 94).

Kaloula indochinensis View in CoL [partim] — Chan et al. (2013: 334, 2014: 577); Chandramouli and Prasad (2018: 52); Poyarkov et al. (2021 b: 39); Vassilieva (2021: 72–73); Holden (2023: 149).

Holotype.

ZMMU A-8134 (field number NAP-14688), adult male, from a pond in Cat Tien National Park , along the road from park headquarters to the Bau Sau Lake , Dong Nai River valley, Dac Lua Commune, Tan Phu District, Dong Nai Province, Vietnam, collected by N. A. Poyarkov, A. M. Bragin, and V. A. Gorin on 15 June, 2024 (11.44121 ° N, 107.41312 ° E; elevation 137 m a. s. l.) (Figs 6 View Figure 6 , 7 C View Figure 7 ). GoogleMaps

Paratypes

(n = 14). ZMMU A-8135 A-8140 (field numbers NAP-14689–14694), six adult males with collection data same as the holotype GoogleMaps ; ZMMU A-8141 A-8143 (field numbers NAP-14688–14694), three adult males with collection data same as the holotype GoogleMaps ; ZISP 15285 –15287 (field numbers NAP- 14687, NAP-14695–14696), three adult males with collection data same as the holotype GoogleMaps ; ZMMU A-4739 (field number NAP-01674), adult male from Cat Tien National Park , Dong Nai River valley, Dac Lua Commune, Tan Phu District, Dong Nai Province, Vietnam, collected by N. A. Poyarkov on June 1, 2011 (11.44576 ° N, 107.38673 ° E; elevation 128 m a. s. l.) GoogleMaps ; ZMMU A-4642 (field number NAP-00630), adult female from Cat Tien National Park , Dong Nai River valley, Dac Lua Commune, Tan Phu District, Dong Nai Province, Vietnam, collected by N. A. Poyarkov and A. B. Vassilieva on June 2, 2009 (11.44576 ° N, 107.38673 ° E; elevation 128 m a. s. l.) (Fig. 8 View Figure 8 ) GoogleMaps .

Referred materials

(n = 3). ZMMU -A-4602-1 – 3 (field numbers NAP- 02010, NAP- 02086, and NAP- 02122), adult female and two subadult females from Cat Tien National Park , Dong Nai River valley, Dac Lua Commune, Tan Phu District, Dong Nai Province, Vietnam, collected by E. A. Galoyan on August 22, 2011, September 15, 2011, and November 11, 2011 (11.419503 ° N, 107.426442 ° E; elevation 117 m a. s. l.) GoogleMaps .

Diagnosis.

Kaloula discordia sp. nov. is distinguished from its congeners by the following combination of morphological characters: (1) medium body size (SVL 42.9–56.2 mm); (2) eyes comparatively small (eye length comprising 60 % – 75 % of snout length); (3) dorsally uniform dark olive-brown; (4) beige-gray ventrally with irregular white mottling on belly and limbs; (5) pale yellow or orange-brown 8 - shaped patch on either side of the neck posterior to eyes; (6) yellowish to orange axillary patch present; (7) grayish to beige-yellow inguinal patch present edged with black markings; (8) from gray to beige spot on tibiotarsal articulation present; (9) dark interorbital bar absent; (10) enlarged, widened finger disks (3 FDD 6.5 % – 7.5 % of SVL), ca. 1.27 times wider than toe disks; (11) finger subarticular tubercle formula: 1: 1: 2: 2; (12) toe subarticular tubercle formula: 1: 1: 2: 2: 2; (13) two metacarpal tubercles not in touch with each other; (14) two metatarsal tubercles, outer metatarsal tubercle rounded, smaller than elongated inner metatarsal tubercle.

Description of the holotype

(Fig. 6 View Figure 6 ). Adult male in a good state of preservation, habitus robust, head wider than long (HW / HL 1.27), snout projecting beyond lower jaw, gently rounded in lateral view (Fig. 6 C View Figure 6 ); truncated in dorsal view; top of head flat; upper eyelid lacking supraciliary tubercles; eye length less than snout length (EL / SL 0.74) and less than interorbital distance (EL / IOD 0.76); pupils round; nostrils rounded, placed more towards the lateral sides of the snout, located closer to tip of snout than to eye, relatively close to each other (IND / IOD 0.60); supratympanic fold flat, glandular, rather thin; tympanum not visible (Fig. 6 C View Figure 6 ); dorsal surfaces of body and limbs with sparse tubercules, getting denser backwards; ventral surfaces of body and limbs with flat tubercules (Fig. 6 A, B View Figure 6 ). Cloacal opening unmodified, directed posteriorly. Forelimbs relatively long, more than a half of hind limb length (FLL / HLL 0.53); hand long, comprising more than a half of lower arm length (HAL / LAL 0.60) and almost half of forelimb length (HAL / FLL 0.49); fingers rather robust, notably flattened in cross section; relative finger lengths: I <II <IV <III; fingers free of webbing; terminal digits flattened forming wide transversely expanded disks (Fig. 6 E View Figure 6 ); finger subarticular tubercles distinct, large and round, finger subarticular tubercle formula 1: 1: 2: 2; inner metacarpal tubercle elongate; outer metacarpal tubercule triangular-shaped, dilated, bigger than inner metacarpal tubercle (OPTL / IPTL 1.18), two metacarpal tubercles not in touch with each other (Figs 6 E View Figure 6 , 9 C View Figure 9 ); hindlimbs robust, relatively short, not much longer than body length (HLL / SVL 1.16); relative toe lengths: I <II <V <III <IV; tarsal fold on inner surface of tarsus absent; tips of all toes widened, forming rounded terminal disks; all toe disks having dorso-terminal groves; the disk on toe IV the largest (Figs 6 D View Figure 6 , 9 C View Figure 9 ); toe webbing well developed between all toes, reaching disks at all toes except toe IV; webbing formula i 1-2 ii 1.5 - 2.5 iii 1.5 - 3 iv 3 - 1.5 v; toe subarticular tubercules distinct, rounded; toe subarticular formula 1: 1: 2: 2: 2; two metatarsal tubercles, inner metatarsal tubercle elongated, oval; outer metatarsal tubercle smaller, rounded (Figs 6 D View Figure 6 , 9 C View Figure 9 ).

Coloration.

In life, the dorsal surfaces of the head and body olive-brown, dorsal surfaces of the limbs grayish-olive with grayish-white spots (Fig. 6 A View Figure 6 ); flanks of the body and lateral sides of the head grayish olive; orange-brown 8 - shaped patches on the neck posterior to eyes; bright-orange axillary patch continuing on elbows (Fig. 7 C View Figure 7 ); grayish-white inguinal patch; small grayish-beige spots near tibiotarsal articulation; ventral surfaces of head and body gray, darker on the throat near the jaw; belly and ventral surfaces of limbs pinkish with weak white mottling (Fig. 6 B View Figure 6 ). Iris golden with brown reticulations ventrally and dorsally from the pupil (Figs 6 C View Figure 6 , 7 C View Figure 7 ). In preservation after one year of storage in ethanol, dorsal coloration faded to dark gray, light patches became less pronounced, and they faded to light gray or grayish-beige, though the pattern generally remained unchanged.

Measurements of the holotype

(in mm): SVL 51.5; HL 11.7; HW 14.8; SL 5.5; EL 4.1; N-EL 3.9; IND 3.2; IOD 5.3; UEW 3.0; FLL 31.9; LAL 26.4; HAL 15.7; HLL 60.0; TL 45.0; FL 30.2; IPTL 3.0; OPTL 3.5; 1 FL 8.1; 1 TOEL 7.9; OMTL 2.1; 3 FDD 3.6; 4 TDD 2.3.

Variation.

Table 4 View Table 4 presents the morphometric variation of the type series. Fig. 8 View Figure 8 displays the variation in dorsal coloration of the paratypes. In general, all paratypes agree well with the description of the holotype, differing only in the brightness of light inguinal and axillary markings. In male paratypes ZISP 15285 and ZMMU A- 8138, the right foot is poorly developed; in male paratype ZMMU A- 8139, the right hand is poorly developed.

Tadpole morphology.

Vassilieva (2021) provided morphometric data and a detailed description of tadpoles of Kaloula discordia sp. nov. (as K. indochinensis ). Vassilieva (2021) noted that tadpoles of ‘ K. indochinensis ’ from Cat Tien NP, Dong Nai Province, southern Vietnam (corresponding to Kaloula discordia sp. nov.) differ from K. indochinensis sensu stricto from Kon Ka Kinh NP, Gia Lai Province, and Chu Mon Ray NP, Kon Tum Province, central Vietnam, by having comparatively longer spiracle tubes (markedly longer than the vent tubes), a narrower mouth relative to body width, more developed tail musculature (tail base width more than a third of the body width), and a rather contrasting tail coloration.

Distribution and natural history.

Kaloula discordia sp. nov. is currently reliably known from Dong Nai, Lam Dong, Tay Ninh, and Binh Phuoc provinces of Southern Vietnam and was also reported from the adjacent Mondulkiri Province of eastern Cambodia; the known distribution of the new species is shown in Fig. 5 View Figure 5 , and the locality information is detailed in Appendix 1. The single Cambodian record of the new species from Phnom Prich Wildlife Sanctuary in Mondulkiri Province, originally reported as K. indochinensis by Chan et al. (2013) and Holden (2023), can be confidently assigned to Kaloula discordia sp. nov. based on the external morphology and coloration of the recorded specimen and the geographic proximity of the locality to the population of Kaloula discordia sp. nov. in Binh Phuoc Province of southern Vietnam. The new species was recorded mostly from relatively low elevations of ca. 70–300 m a. s. l.; in Bao Loc forestry of Lam Dong Province, the new species was recorded at elevations up to 550 m a. s. l. Kaloula discordia sp. nov. is restricted to lowland and hilly, seasonally dry, semi-deciduous, and evergreen monsoon forests of southern Vietnam (see Vassilieva et al. 2016). Male frogs were recorded calling from small temporary pools and flooded areas from May to November (Fig. 7 A, B View Figure 7 ); the peak of the breeding season coincides with heavy rains in June – August. The new species is semi-fossorial and quite elusive and is usually active only after periods of heavy rains; frogs are aestivating during dry periods in leaf litter, underground borrows, or tree hollows ( Vassilieva et al. 2016; Holden 2023). Diet consists of ants and beetles ( Vassilieva et al. 2016); the new species is a good climber; males can call when perching a few meters above ground level ( Holden 2023). The actual distribution of K. discordia sp. nov. is still insufficiently known, but we suppose that this species is likely to occur in those provinces of southern Vietnam where forests similar in composition are still preserved, including Dak Nong, Binh Duong, Binh Thuan, and Ba Ria-Vung Tau provinces. Syntopic species of amphibians included Microhyla butleri Boulenger, 1900 ; M. heymonsi Vogt, 1911 ; M. mukhlesuri ; Kaloula pulchra ; Fejervarya limnocharis (Gravenhorst, 1829) ; Occidozyga martensii ; Polypedates megacephalus Hallowell, 1861 ; and Rhacophorus annamensis Smith, 1924 .

Comparisons.

Kaloula discordia sp. nov. most closely resembles other frogs of the K. baleata species complex in overall morphology; most specifically, it is similar to K. indochinensis , with which it was previously confused. From K. indochinensis , the new species can be distinguished by having generally smaller eye size in males (EL mean 3.5 ± 0.3 mm [n = 14] vs. mean 3.9 ± 0.2 mm [n = 18]; EL / SVL 0.071 ± 0.004 vs. 0.079 ± 0.004); smaller finger I in males (1 FL mean 7.8 ± 0.4 mm [n = 14] vs. mean 8.5 ± 0.7 mm [n = 18]; 1 FL / SVL 0.16 ± 0.01 vs. 0.17 ± 0.007); generally smaller inner palmar tubercules in males (IPTL mean 2.8 ± 0.3 mm [n = 14] vs. mean 3.1 ± 0.4 mm [n = 18]; IPTL / SVL 0.056 ± 0.004 vs. 0.062 ± 0.005); and generally smaller outer palmar tubercules in males (OPTL mean 3.2 ± 0.2 mm [n = 14] mm vs. mean 3.3 ± 0.4 mm [n = 18]; OPTL / SVL 0.064 ± 0.004 vs. 0.067 ± 0.005); generally longer hindlimbs in both sexes (HLL mean 59.6 ± 1.9 mm [n = 14] in males, mean 67.5 ± 0.2 mm [n = 2] in females vs. mean 55.2 ± 3.3 mm [n = 18] in males; 62.7 mm [n = 1] in female; HLL / SVL 1.21 ± 0.04 vs. 1.12 ± 0.03 in both sexes); smaller metatarsal tubercule in males (OMTL mean 2.2 ± 0.3 mm [n = 14] vs. mean 2.7 ± 0.3 mm [n = 18]); by having two metacarpal tubercles, see Fig. 9 C View Figure 9 (vs. three metacarpal tubercles, see Fig. 9 B View Figure 9 ); by having two subarticular tubercles on toe IV, see Fig. 9 C View Figure 9 (vs. three well-developed subarticular tubercles, see Fig. 9 B View Figure 9 ); and by having olive dorsal coloration (vs. chocolate-brown to dark grayish-brown).

From K. baleata (morphological data taken from Chan et al. 2013), Kaloula discordia sp. nov. can be distinguished by having generally smaller eyes in both sexes (EL mean 3.5 ± 0.3 mm [n = 14] in males, mean 4.2 ± 0.01 mm [n = 2] in females vs. mean 4.1 ± 0.4 mm [n = 10] in males, mean 4.5 ± 1.7 mm [n = 2] in females); larger distance between nares in both sexes (IND mean 3.1 ± 0.1 mm [n = 14] in males, mean 3.7 ± 0.1 mm [n = 2] in females vs. mean 2.7 ± 0.4 mm [n = 10] in males, mean 3.1 ± 0.30 mm [n = 2] in females); wider finger III disks in both sexes (3 FDD mean 3.5 ± 0.3 mm [n = 14] in males, mean 3.9 ± 0.1 mm [n = 2] in females vs. mean 1.7 ± 0.2 mm [n = 10] in males, mean 2.1 ± 0.6 mm [n = 2] in females); smaller metatarsal tubercule in males (OMTL mean 2.2 ± 0.3 mm [n = 14] vs. mean 3.2 ± 0.2 mm [n = 10]); and by having two subarticular tubercles on toe IV, see Fig. 9 C View Figure 9 (vs. three well-developed subarticular tubercles).

From K. latidisca (morphological data taken from Chan et al. 2014), the new species can be distinguished by having shorter head in males (HL mean 11.2 ± 0.6 mm [n = 14] vs. mean 14.4 ± 0.8 mm [n = 4]); narrower head in males (HW mean 14.7 ± 0.7 mm (n = 14) vs. mean 18.7 ± 1.1 mm [n = 4]); smaller distance between nares in males (IND mean 3.1 ± 0.1 mm [n = 14] vs. mean 4.0 ± 0.1 mm [n = 4]); smaller distance between eyes in males (IOD mean 5.0 ± 0.2 mm [n = 14] vs. mean 5.7 ± 0.4 mm [n = 4]); smaller eye in males (EL mean 3.5 ± 0.3 mm [n = 14] vs. mean 4.6 ± 0.3 mm [n = 4]); smaller metatarsal tubercle in males (OMTL mean 2.2 ± 0.3 mm [= 14] vs. mean 3.4 ± 0.1 mm [n = 4]); and by having two subarticular tubercles on toe IV, see Fig. 9 C View Figure 9 (vs. three subarticular tubercles).

Furthermore, Kaloula discordia sp. nov. differs from K. aureata Nutphand, 1989 , by having an olive dorsum with no dark reticulations (vs. golden dorsum with dark brown reticulations); from K. borealis by having wider finger disks (vs. finger tips slightly dilated but not forming wide disks); by yellowish blotches on flanks absent (vs. present); and by olive dorsal coloration (vs. gray-brown). The new species is further diagnosed from K. conjuncta by the stratified coloration on flanks absent (vs. present) and by having distinct outer metatarsal tubercle (vs. weak or indistinct). Kaloula discordia sp. nov. differs from K. ghoshi by having axillary and inguinal light spots (vs. absent); tubercles on dorsum and venter (vs. smooth skin or with small granules dorsally); and olive dorsal coloration (vs. orange-brown). The new species further differs from K. kalingensis by having tubercles on the dorsum (vs. dorsum smooth); by having a distinct outer metatarsal tubercle (vs. indistinct); yellow or orange axillary and inguinal spots (vs. usually absent or small and red if present); lacking light pericloacal ring (vs. present); from K. kokacii by tuberculated dorsum (vs. smooth); axillary and inguinal spots (vs. absent); from K. mediolineata by lacking dorsolateral stripes (vs. present); sacral medial stripe absent (vs. present); and finger disks widened (vs. finger disks slightly dilated but not forming wide disks). Kaloula discordia sp. nov. is distinguished from K. nonggangensis by lacking protuberant tubercles on the upper surface of finger tips (vs. present); from K. picta by lacking dorsolateral stripes (vs. present); by the stratified coloration on flanks absent (vs. present); and by having wide finger disks (vs. finger disks slightly dilated but not forming wide disks). The new species further differs from K. pulchra by the absence of dorsolateral stripes (vs. always present); by having axillary and inguinal spots (vs. absent); from K. rigida by having wide finger disks (vs. finger disks slightly dilated but not forming wide disks); by the stratified coloration on flanks absent (vs. present); by the absence of dorsolateral stripes (vs. present); and by having axillary and inguinal spots (vs. absent). Kaloula discordia sp. nov. differs from K. rugifera by having wide finger disks (vs. slightly expanded small finger disks); by having axillary and inguinal spots (vs. absent); from K. verrucosa by having wide finger disks (vs. slightly expanded small finger disks); by having axillary and inguinal spots (vs. absent); from K. walteri by having wide finger disks (vs. slightly expanded small finger disks); by the stratified coloration on flanks absent (vs. present); having axillary and inguinal spots (vs. absent); and by having a distinct outer metatarsal tubercle (vs. indistinct or absent). Kaloula discordia sp. nov. is geographically isolated from other members of the K. baleata species complex and most of the other congeners, except K. pulchra , with which it occurs in sympatry everywhere throughout its range, and, possibly, K. mediolineata , with which the new species might co-occur in the Tay Ninh, Binh Phuoc, and Ba Ria-Vung Tau provinces of southern Vietnam.

Acoustic data.

For a comparison of the male advertisement calls of Kaloula discordia sp. nov. with K. indochinensis sensu stricto, see Table 3 View Table 3 ; data for K. indochinensis are taken from Nguyen et al. (2022). The power call parameters of Kaloula discordia sp. nov. and K. indochinensis are quite similar, with the dominant frequency of the call being the same in the two species (0.38 kHz, range 0.34–0.43 kHz vs. 0.38 kHz, range 0.30–0.45 kHz, respectively) (Table 3 View Table 3 ). At the same time, Kaloula discordia sp. nov. had a slightly shorter call duration (186.1 ms, range 144–214 ms) than K. indochinensis (215.6 ms, range 194–250 ms) and a significantly longer intercall interval: 1539.4 ms (range 851–8954 ms) in Kaloula discordia sp. nov. vs. 789.3 ms (range 481–1627 ms) in K. indochinensis . These differences have to be taken cautiously as the records of calling of the two species were taken with different ambient temperatures (20.5 ° C for K. indochinensis and 24.0 ° C for the new species), which also could contribute to the observed differences in call parameters between the two species. Nguyen et al. (2022) did not calculate the number of pulses per call in K. indochinensis and noted the presence of one pulse per call in this species ( Nguyen et al. 2022: Table 2 View Table 2 ), while we recorded 11–13 pulses per call in Kaloula discordia sp. nov. These differences actually result from the different terminology used by Nguyen et al. (2022) and our study, as the waveform oscillograms in Nguyen et al. (2022) clearly show the presence of several pulses in each call.

Etymology.

The specific epithet “ discordia ” is a noun in apposition, in the nominative case, given in reference to the Roman mythological goddess Discordia. According to the poet Hesiod, this goddess personified not only strife and discord but also competition and labor (Hesiod, Theogony: 20–24, 226–230; see Most 2006). The duality of this name echoes the two aspects of the discovery of the new species. The first aspect is the authors’ hard work and laborious approach in collecting data for the description of the new species. The second challenge pertains to the authors’ internal struggle to choose a politically correct and neutral name for the new species. In modern taxonomy, international teams often face the common challenge of strife and competition; however, this can also lead to overall scientific progress. We recommend “ South Vietnamese Painted Frog ” as the common name in English, “ Yuzhnovietnamskiy Bychiy Uzkorot ” as the common name in Russian, and “ Ễnh ương Nam b ộ ” as the common name in the Vietnamese language.

Conservation status.

At present, the new species is reliably known only from four localities in southern Vietnam and a single locality in eastern Cambodia (Fig. 5 View Figure 5 ; Appendix 1). The main threats to this species in Vietnam are habitat loss and degradation. The new species is restricted to the lowland monsoon tropical forests of southern Vietnam; it should be noted that these forests during the last 40 years have been subjected to greater anthropomorphic conversion (including logging, agriculture, road construction, and other human activities) than other areas in Vietnam (e. g., De Koninck 1999; Kuznetsov and Kuznetsova 2011; Laurance 2007; Meijer 1973; Meyfroidt and Lambin 2008). The range of the new species covers several nature conservation areas of southern Vietnam and Cambodia, including Cat Tien NP (Dong Nai Biosphere Reserve), Bu Gia Map NP, Lo Go-Xa Mat NP ( Vietnam), and Phnom Prich Wildlife Sanctuary ( Cambodia). Given the lack of comprehensive studies on the adjacent territories, we suggest Kaloula discordia sp. nov. be classified as Data Deficient (DD) according to the IUCN’s Red List categories ( IUCN 2019).

ZMMU

Zoological Museum, Moscow Lomonosov State University

ZISP

Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Amphibia

Order

Anura

Family

Microhylidae

Genus

Kaloula

Loc

Kaloula discordia Poyarkov, Gorin, Bragin & Nguyen

Gorin, Vladislav A., Orlov, Nikolai L., Bragin, Andrey M., Pawangkhanant, Parinya, Milto, Konstantin D., Le, Dac Xuan, Nguyen, Tan Van, Dufresnes, Christophe, Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon & Poyarkov, Nikolay A. 2024
2024
Loc

Kaloula indochinensis

Holden J 2023: 149
Vassilieva AB 2021: 72 - 73
Chandramouli SR & Prasad KVD 2018: 52
Chan KO & Grismer LL & Brown RM 2014: 577
Chan KO & Blackburn DC & Murphy RW & Stuart BL & Emmett DA & Ho CT & Brown RM 2013: 334
Poyarkov NA & Nguyen TV & Popov ES & Geissler P & Pawangkhanant P & Neang T & Suwannapoom C & Orlov NL : 39
2013
Loc

Kaloula baleata

Nguyen SV & Ho CT & Nguyen TQ 2009: 94
Orlov NL & Ananjeva NB 2007: 148
Nguyen SV & Ho CT & Nguyen TQ 2005: 43
Orlov NL & Murphy RW & Ananjeva NB & Ryabov SA & Ho CT 2002: 99
2002