Juxtlacampa juxtlahuacensis Wygodzinsky, 1944

Sendra, Alberto, Palacios, Jose, Garcia, Arturo & Montejo, Maira, 2016, New Species of Campodeidae (Diplura) from Mexican caves, Zootaxa 4072 (5), pp. 540-558 : 551

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4072.5.2

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9D67CC9E-D04E-4AF3-B3CC-E7D4557784B9

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6055037

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FE87FB-D236-FFA9-FF07-FED2FE58F87C

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Juxtlacampa juxtlahuacensis Wygodzinsky, 1944
status

 

Juxtlacampa juxtlahuacensis Wygodzinsky, 1944

( Figs. 22‒25 View FIGURES 22 ‒ 24 View FIGURE 25 , 29‒33 View FIGURES 29 ‒ 33 , 34 View FIGURE 34 )

Redescription from neotype material. Although the description by Wygodzinsky (1944) of J. juxtlahuacensis was accurately done and well-illustrated, a new redescription is needed with details of macrosetae, epicuticle, sensilla of the head and antennae, glandular setae on urosternite I and telotarsal morphology.

Body length of five females 3.5‒5.7 mm, length of five males 3.3‒4.2 mm ( Fig. 34 View FIGURE 34 ). Epicuticle with dense, thin microspines; body with numerous clothing setae covered by short, thick barbs ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 22 ‒ 24 ).

Antennae with 28 or 29 antennomeres, six antennae apparently intact but with sensilla of cupuliform organ deformed, suggesting regenerated antennae. Sensillum of third antennomere subcylindrical, sharply pointed, located in ventral position between macrosetae d and e. Central antennomeres 2.5 times longer than wide in larger adults, twice longer than wide in medium-sized adults, and 1.4 times longer than wide in the smallest adults and juveniles. Gouge sensilla ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 22 ‒ 24 , 29‒31 View FIGURES 29 ‒ 33 ) atypical, being shorter than those of typical troglomorphic species, with 10‒12 Μm long in a single distal whorl of about 12 sensilla on each medial and distal antennomere. Frontal process slightly developed ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 22 ‒ 24 ), with one apical and two posterior short, thick macrosetae with small, thick barbs. Three macrosetae along line of insertion of antennae and x setae, in female neotype (length 5.0 mm) length ratios as a = 0.56, p = 0.58, i = 1, x = 0.51; all covered with thick barbs along the distal half. Labial palp subtriangular, with subcylindrical latero-external sensillum ending in blunt tip, with two guard setae, up to 18 setae on the anterior border and up to 80 neuroglandular setae.

Thoracic macrosetae distribution ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 22 ‒ 24 ): pronotum with 1+1 ma, 1+1 la, 1+1 lp; mesonotum with 1+1 ma; metanotum without macrosetae. All macrosetae short, heavy, covered by thick barbs; marginal setae thicker and longer than clothing setae, mostly covered by thick barbs. Legs slightly elongated, metathoracic legs reaching abdominal segment VIII. Femur III without dorsal macrosetae. Tibia III without ventral macrosetae. Calcars well barbed from base to tip with long barbs. Dorsal and lateral tarsal setae completely covered by thin barbs almost from their base. Subequal elbow-like claws with short extension at the basal end of the posterior claw; lateral crests well developed, noticeably ridged on ventral side and very slightly on dorsal side ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 29 ‒ 33 ). Telotarsal process laminar in basal portion with long ventral pubescence, becoming larger in distal portion and covered with long foliate barbs on ventral side ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 29 ‒ 33 ).

Distribution of abdominal macrosetae on tergites: 2+2 post VIII and 4+4 post IX, all of them long and well barbed along the distal two-thirds. Urosternite I with 15‒17+15‒17 thick macrosetae with long barbs; urosternites II to VII with 7+7 macrosetae, urosternite VIII with 2+2 macrosetae. Apical setae of styli with basal tooth divided in two branches and completely barbed with thin barbs; subapical and medial sternal setae barbed. One cercus regenerated but complete, length 11.7 mm in paraneotype male 4.2 mm long, with 25 articles plus base; each article progressively longer and covered with increasing numbers of whorls (4 up to 20) of barbed macrosetae.

Male urosternite I ( Fig. 25 View FIGURE 25 ) with two very large bacilliform appendages, each bearing more than 110 a1 - glandular setae in a large field, and more than 100 a2 -glandular setae in another large field that starts at the base of the appendages; marginal field very large with more than 180 g 1 -glandular setae. In largest neoparatype males these appendages 0.35 mm long in males of 4.1 mm and 4.2 mm body length; in adults with well developed genital papilla and body lengths of 3.9 mm and 3.3 mm these appendages 0.2 mm and 0.13 mm long, respectively, and supporting only 6‒10 each of a1, a2 and g1 glandular setae. Female ursoternite I with thick subcylindrical appendages, in neotype with distal portion thinner and with 8 “a1-glandular setae.

Type material. Wygodzinsky (1944) did not indicate where type material was deposited and none could be found in any American or Mexican collections. Designation of a neotype is warranted, as follows: Neotype female, four female and five male paraneotypes from “Grutas de Juxtlahuaca”, 99° 07’ N, 17°25’ W, located in Xotlametzi limestone hill at Quechultnango,Guerrero, México, 8 IX 2014, O. Moldovan leg., mounted in Hoyer’s solution, deposited in UNAM.

UNAM

Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Entognatha

Order

Diplura

Family

Campodeidae

Genus

Juxtlacampa

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF