Ischnothyreus pome, Tong & Bian & Li, 2023
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1152.100341 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:272CD646-9DC9-4605-885B-2862DB1D5E4C |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/89199E5A-66CB-4CA0-8396-6000B96A81EA |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:89199E5A-66CB-4CA0-8396-6000B96A81EA |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Ischnothyreus pome |
status |
sp. nov. |
Ischnothyreus pome View in CoL sp. nov.
Figs 4D-F View Figure 4 , 6A-L View Figure 6 , 7A-I View Figure 7
Type material.
Holotype ♂ (SYNU-526): China, Tibet, Nyingchi, Pome County, road to Metok County, 80 K; 29°39.897'N, 95°29.963'E; 2140 ± 5 m; 10.VIII.2013; Qi Cao leg. Paratypes 2♂, 3♀ (SYNU-527-531): same data as for holotype.
Diagnosis.
Females of the new species are similar to those of I. jianglangi Tong & Li, 2020 in having the large, chestnut-shaped structure of the endogyne, but can be distinguished by the simple winding duct of the endogyne (Fig. 7H, I View Figure 7 ) vs. the complex winding duct (see Tong et al. 2020: fig. 17B). Males of the new species are similar to those of I. yunlong Tong & Li, 2021 in having the large flag-like sclerotized process of the cheliceral fang, but can be distinguished by the fused abdominal dorsal and epigastric scuta (Fig. 6C View Figure 6 ) vs. unfused (see Huang et al. 2021: fig. 1E), and by lacking the dorsal protuberance on the distal end of the bulb (Fig. 4D, E View Figure 4 ) vs. with dorsal protuberance (see Huang et al. 2021: fig. 2J).
Description.
Male (holotype). Body: habitus as in Fig. 6A-C View Figure 6 ; body length 1.58. Carapace: 0.84 long, 0.69 wide; yellow, oval in dorsal view, with brown egg-shaped patches behind eyes, pars cephalica strongly elevated in lateral view, surface of elevated portion of pars cephalica smooth, sides finely reticulate, lateral margin straight, smooth (Fig. 6D View Figure 6 ). Clypeus: straight in frontal view, ALE separated from edge of carapace by 1.4 × of their diameter (Fig. 6F View Figure 6 ). Eyes: ALE largest, ALE circular, PME squared, PLE oval; posterior eye row recurved from above; ALE touching, ALE-PLE touching (Fig. 6D, F View Figure 6 ). Sternum: as long as wide, pale orange (Fig. 6E View Figure 6 ). Mouthparts: chelicerae, endites, and labium yellow; chelicerae straight, with ridge-like protuberance at anterior face, base of fangs with large flag-like sclerotized process, fang groove with a few small and two larger denticles (Figs 4F View Figure 4 , 6G-I View Figure 6 ); anteromedian tip of endites with one strong, tooth-like projection (Fig. 6E View Figure 6 ). Abdomen: 0.74 long, 0.46 wide; dorsal scutum well sclerotized, dark brown, covering 3/5 of abdomen width and approximately 2/3 of abdomen length, fused to epigastric scutum (arrow in Fig. 6C View Figure 6 ); postgastric scutum covering ~ 5/6 of abdomen length. Legs: pale orange, femur I with two prolateral spines, tibia I with four pairs, metatarsus I with two pairs of long ventral spines. Leg II spination similar to leg I, except femur with only one prolateral spine. Legs III and IV spineless. Palp: trochanter with ventral projection; bulb without small ventral protuberance, distal end of bulb stout, with needle-like membrane and broad leaf-like projection (Figs 4D, E View Figure 4 , 6J-L View Figure 6 ).
Female (paratype, SYNU-529). Same as male except as noted. Body: habitus as in Fig. 7A-C View Figure 7 ; body length 1.64. Carapace: 0.77 long, 0.67 wide. Mouthparts: chelicerae and endites unmodified. Abdomen: 0.88 long, 0.65 wide; dorsal scutum very small; epigastric scutum well sclerotized, orange; postgastric scutum widely hexagonal, only around epigastric furrow. Endogyne: winding duct simple, with anterior portion straight, strongly convoluted only in posterior section, ending in large, chestnut-shaped structure (Fig. 7H, I View Figure 7 ).
Etymology.
The specific name is a noun in apposition taken from the type locality.
Distribution.
Known only from the type locality.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |