Hylopanchax leki, Van Der Zee, Jouke R., Sonnenberg, Rainer & Schliewen, Ulrich K., 2013
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3701.1.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:93511244-CE5B-4BDA-AB45-50B4D3A47D50 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5631396 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EB0F49A8-0F44-43A6-9FB2-927ACCF16534 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:EB0F49A8-0F44-43A6-9FB2-927ACCF16534 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hylopanchax leki |
status |
sp. nov. |
Hylopanchax leki View in CoL , new species
( Figs. 6–8 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 , Table 1 View TABLE 1 )
Holotype. ZSM 40764 (ex ZSM 29615), male, 26.6 mm SL, Democratic Republic of Congo, Province Bandundu, stream at Lompolé and Yaka (02° 34' S, 20° 14' E), U. Schliewen, 28–29 July 2002.
Paratypes. ZSM 40765 (ex ZSM 29615), 4 males and 5 females, 21.9–29.0 mm, collected with the holotype.
Diagnosis. Placed in Hylopanchax based on the diagnostic characters given above. Distinguished from all other Hylopanchax species except for Hylopanchax ndeko , new species, by the position of the dorsal fin (D/A = 8– 10 versus D/A = 11–14), the number of dorsal fin rays (11–13 versus 6–9), the number of pectoral fin rays (11 –13 versus 8–10), the number of transversal scales (19–20 versus 15 or 16) by its deep body (29.2–35.5 % SL versus 16.3–25.6 % SL), by the low caudal peduncle ratio (1.2–1.7 versus 1.6–2.4), and by having 2 or 3 rows of scales underneath the eye versus 1 row of scales. Longer dorsal spines of vertebrae at mid-body versus short dorsal spines with lower length differences between mid-body and anterior or posterior spines. Distinguished from Hylopanchax ndeko , new species, by having fewer scales in the longitudinal series (mode 22, range 21–23 versus mode 25 and 24–26), prominent lobes of the supra-temporal neuromast system and male colour pattern ( Figs. 6 View FIGURE 6 & 7 View FIGURE 7 ). Snout, lower jaw, and anterior part of throat dark orange versus yellow snout and lower jaw and white throat in H. ndeko , new species; flanks just below dorsal fin with orange shine versus purple shine, dorsal and anal fin dark orange versus yellow anal and dorsal fin with a red distal submarginal stripe and a nearly transparent margin, white edged caudal fin olive brown with orange shine versus white edged blue caudal fin.
Description. See Figures 6 View FIGURE 6 and 7 View FIGURE 7 for general appearance and Table 1 View TABLE 1 for morphometric and meristic data of the type series. A large and deep Hylopanchax species, laterally strongly compressed; dorsal profile convex, slightly concave at nape; greatest body depth between pelvic and anal fin; ventral profile convex from head to end of anal fin; snout rounded, mouth directed upwards; lower jaw longer then upper jaw; on both jaws an outer row of larger, slightly curved conical teeth, inner teeth row more irregular arranged with smaller teeth; symphysis forming a ridge on lower and less on upper jaw; branchiostegal appendages present in adult males.
Frontal or nasal neuromasts not present, one pre-orbital neuromast in short shallow open groove; post-orbital and supra-orbital neuromast system provided with large neuromasts and large lobes, covering a great part of the groove; pre-opercular neuromast system with 5 pores; lobes of supra-temporal neuromast system very prominent, even visible with the naked eye. A µCT scan of two specimens showed the following characters: total number of 30 vertebrae, hypurals fused to one hypural plate, ten caudal fin rays attached to hypural plate, posterior neural and hemal spines flattened, the top of the latter fused to hypural plate ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 ). Scales cycloid, body completely scaled except ventral head surface, two to three rows of scales underneath the eye, frontal squamation of G-type, no scales on dorsal and anal fin base, scales on mid longitudinal series 21–23. Number of dorsal fin rays 11–13, anal fin rays 18–20, caudal fin rays 24–27, pelvic fin rays 6, pectoral fin rays 11–13. First dorsal fin ray above anal fin ray 8–10.
Colouration. Live specimens. Males ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 ). Back olive brown changing to orange below dorsal fin, flanks silverish with light green shine, changing to white on ventral side, snout and lower jaw orange. Flanks with four to five rows of scales anteriorly edged with black crescent shaped markings. Median fins and pelvic fins orange. Caudal fin with posterior white edge. Pectoral fins translucent. Narrow black band along base of anal fin. Urogenital papilla black.
Females. No information on live colouration available.
Preserved in ethanol. Males ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 ). Back brown, flanks light brown, ventrally edged with a band of black pigmentation, ventral side below this band whitish. Snout dark brown. Black pigmentation on flanks and anal fin as in live specimens. Pectoral fins translucent, all other fins greyish, caudal fin with posterior white edge.
Females ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 ). As males, less black pigmentation on flanks, black band at base of anal fin hardly visible, urogenital opening round, edged with small black spots.
Distribution. Hylopanchax leki is currently only known from the type locality, a small shady stream at Lompolé at the right bank of the Lokoro River, Salonga National Park, central Congo basin ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). Syntopic species: Barbus sp. aff. hulstaerti/papilio, Aphyosemion sp. and Congochromis cf. sabinae .
Etymology. The species name “ leki ” is the Lingala word for the “smaller or younger sibling”, referring to the fact that the species is the slightly smaller one of the sibling species pair described herein, the larger being Hylopanchax ndeko , new species of the left bank of the Lokoro river. A noun in apposition.
Holotype ♂ TL 32.4 | Paratype ♂ 35.4 | Paratype ♂ 33.8 | Paratype ♂ 34.6 | Paratype ♂ 27.8 | Paratype ♀ 35.9 | Paratype ♀ 31.5 | Paratype ♀ 28.3 | Paratype ♀ 29.0 | Paratype ♀ 27.8 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SL 26.6 BD 30.5 HL 22.6 | 29.0 35.5 22.8 | 28.3 34.3 22.6 | 27.9 32.3 23.3 | 22.1 32.1 26.2 | 28.4 29.2 22.5 | 25.5 30.2 22.7 | 22.5 33.8 25.8 | 23.0 32.6 25.2 | 21.9 31.5 25.6 |
ED 8.3 IO 10.9 PD 63.1 | 9.3 11.7 63.4 | 9.2 11.7 61.8 | 9.0 11.1 65.2 | 11.3 12.7 64.7 | 8.5 12.0 65.8 | 9.8 11.4 65.0 | 11.1 12.4 65.3 | 11.3 12.2 65.2 | 14.2 12.8 65.2 |
PA 51.1 PP 37.2 CL 18.8 | 51.0 37.6 19.7 | 53.3 37.8 19.8 | 50.9 38.4 19.0 | 52.0 38.5 19.0 | 60.6 40.5 21.5 | 56.1 39.2 23.1 | 53.8 39.1 20.9 | 57.8 42.2 18.7 | 52.9 29.3 19.6 |
CH 14.7 CR 1.3 AB 27.8 | 14.8 1.3 26.2 | 14.8 1.3 26.9 | 14.7 1.3 29.7 | 15.4 1.2 26.7 | 14.0 1.6 18.7 | 13.7 1.7 20.4 | 15.1 1.4 24.0 | 14.8 1.2 24.3 | 15.5 1.3 25.1 |
DB 21.4 LS 22 TS 20 | 20.3 21 19 | 17.7 22 19 | 20.4 22 19 | 19.5 23 20 | 22.2 23 20 | 16.5 21 20 | 16.0 21 19 | 15.6 22 20 | 17.8 22 20 |
D 13 A 19 D/A 8 | 13 20 10 | ? 18 9 | 12 19 10 | 12 18 9 | 13 19 9 | 12 18 9 | 12 19 9 | 11 20 10 | 13 20 9 |
C 26 P 12 | 26 12 | 25 11 | 25 12 | 25 12 | 27 13 | 25 13 | 26 13 | 24 13 | 26 13 |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |