Himalaphantes auriculus, Irfan & Zhang & Peng, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.8.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7573989 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AE87CE-BD24-FFEB-FC8C-3A7FFF0EFA67 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Himalaphantes auriculus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Himalaphantes auriculus sp. nov. (ĄĝẲĦƦ) Figures 136 View FIGURE 136 , 137 View FIGURE 137 , 146 View FIGURE 146
Types. Holotype ♀, CHINA, Yunnan, Gongshan County, Cikai Township, Dabadi to Gongshan , along Pula River downward, 27.7945833°N, 98.5071389°E, 3025–3990m, 4 October 2002, Heng-mei Yan leg. (Yan021004) GoogleMaps . Paratypes: 1♀, same data as holotype female (Yan021004) GoogleMaps ; 1♀, Cikai Township , Dabadi , North bank of Pula river, 27.78333°N, 98.51667°E, alt. 3030m, 28 September 2002, Heng-mei Yan leg. (Yan020928) GoogleMaps .
Etymology. This epithet derives from the Latin adjective “ auricula ”, meaning “ear lobe”, referring to the scape lateral margin with an ear lobe-shaped outgrowth in the epigyne.
Diagnosis. The new species resembles Himalaphantes fugongensis sp. nov. in having the similar spermathecae and posterior median plate in epigyne ( Fig. 136A–C View FIGURE 136 ; Fig. 138A–C View FIGURE 138 ), but can be distinguished by the lateral lobes short in H. auriculus sp. nov. ( Fig. 136A–C View FIGURE 136 ), whereas three times longer in H. fugongensis sp. nov. ( Fig. 138A–C View FIGURE 138 ). The length of posterior margin of scape three and half times longer than the lateral lobe in H. auriculus sp. nov. ( Fig. 136A–C View FIGURE 136 ), whereas the lateral lobe two and half times longer than the posterior margin of scape in H. fugongensis sp. nov. ( Fig. 138A–C View FIGURE 138 ).
Description: Female (holotype, Fig. 137A, B View FIGURE 137 ): Total length: 4.18; carapace 1.53 long, 1.09 wide, brown; cephalic region slightly elevated, with a brown band, lateral sides brown; fovea, cervical and radial grooves distinct. Clypeus 0.29 high. Sternum longer than wide, dark brown. Labium wider than long, brown. Maxillae long, distal end broad with scopulae. Chelicerae brown, with four promarginal and three retromarginal teeth. Eye region narrow,AER recurved, PER straight, slightly wider than AER. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.09, ALE 0.12, PME 0.11, PLE 0.10, AME–AME 0.05, AME–ALE, 0.07, PME–PME 0.07, PME–PLE 0.07, AME–PME, 0.13, ALE–ALE 0.55, PLE–PLE 0.58, ALE–PLE 0.02. Legs with annuli; length of legs: I 8.77 (2.31, 2.92, 2.23, 1.31), II 7.31 (1.98, 2.43, 1.89, 1.01), III 4.57 (1.23, 1.49, 1.22, 0.63), IV 6.38 (1.78, 1.91, 1.74, 0.95); leg formula I-II-IV-III. Tm I 0.69 and Tm IV 0.46. Tibial dorsal spine formula: 2-2-2-2. Abdomen 2.65 long, 1.79 wide, oval, yellow, proximal end with a longitudinal band followed by irregular green patches extending posteriorly; ventral side green, with irregular greenish patches.
Epigyne ( Fig. 136A–C View FIGURE 136 ): Scape wider than long, with a deep depression posteriorly and a lateral lobe on each side; stretcher longer than wide with round end. copulatory openings present in lateral pockets. Entrance grooves sinuous. Posterior median plate trapezoid. Spermathecae relatively large, L-shaped.
Male. Unknown.
Distribution. Known only from the type locality ( Fig. 146 View FIGURE 146 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |