Haliclona (Flagellia) hentscheli, Van Soest, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2017.351 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:245E3075-9559-4DD4-8101-665F9321648A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3851956 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/510FEC4E-8B54-9047-FE33-FEF01592FCC5 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Haliclona (Flagellia) hentscheli |
status |
|
Haliclona (Flagellia) hentscheli View in CoL subgen. et nom. nov.
Fig. 9 View Fig
Gellius incrustans Hentschel 1912: 390 View in CoL , pl. XV fig. 3, pl. XXI fig. 45.
Etymology
The specific epithet refers to E. Hentschel, author of Gellius incrustans .
Material examined
INDONESIA: South Sulawesi, Tana Djampea, Kambarangi Bay, 7.1058° S, 120.6274° E, depth 0–32 m, trawl, coll. Siboga Expedition stat. 64, 4 May 1899 ( ZMA Por. 01225), same data as for previous ( ZMA Por. 01226); Maluku,Ambon,Ambon Bay, near Hative Besar, 3.6833° N, 128.1333° E, 0–5 m, snorkeling, coll. R.W.M. Van Soest, Snellius II Expedition stat. 002/II/18A, 6 Sep. 1984 ( ZMA Por. 08797); Snellius II Expedition, fieldnr 4.045, NE coast of Sumba, E of Melolo, 9.9033° S, 120.7167° E, depth 48–57 m, Van Veen grab, 13 Sep. 1984 (unregistered slide); Snellius II Expedition, fieldnr 56J, NE coast of Sumba, E of Melolo, 9.9° S, 120.7477° E, depth 125 m, dredge, 14 Sep. 1984 (unregistered slide).
Description
Encrusting sponges with an uneven surface ( Fig. 9A View Fig ), with slightly raised oscules ( Fig. 9A View Fig 1 View Fig ). One (ZMA 01225, Fig. 9A View Fig ) encrusts the base of an octocoral. Greyish beige in alcohol. Lateral size up to 2 × 1 cm, thickness 3–4 mm, oscules 2 mm in diameter. Consistency soft.
SKELETON. Confusedly Haliclona -like, with paucispicular primary tracts interconnected by single oxeas. Special surface reticulation lacking. No visible spongin.
OXEAS ( Fig. 9 View Fig B–B1). Sharply pointed, straight, in a narrow size range, 198– 214 –238 × 4– 6. 4 –11.5 μm.
FLAGELLOSIGMAS ( Fig. 9 View Fig C–E). Circular to ovoid in shape, in two size categories. Larger ones ( Fig. 9 View Fig C– D) with rather short but distinctly upturned long endings ( Fig. 9C View Fig 1 View Fig ), both large and small ones with gradually widely curved short endings ( Fig. 9C View Fig 2 View Fig , E). Large flagellosigmas (I), with length of long endings 69– 84 –98 μm, short endings 51– 54 –63 μm, widths 53– 66 –83 μm, thickness 1.5– 1. 7 –2 μm. Small flagellosigmas (II) ( Fig. 9 View Fig E–F), with length of long endings 27– 42 –66 μm, short endings 16– 24 – 34 μm, widths 18– 29 –39 μm, thickness 0.5– 0. 8 –1.5 μm.
NORMAL SIGMAS ( Fig. 9 View Fig G–H). The most common microscleres, occurring in two distinct size classes, the larger ones (I) ( Fig. 9G View Fig ) with rather sharply bent endings, robust, 57– 71 –81 × 1.5– 2. 4 –3 μm, the smaller thinner ones (II) ( Fig. 9H View Fig ) incurved more roundedly, 14– 22 –32 × 0.5– 0. 6 –1 μm.
Distribution and ecology
Indonesia: Aru Islands, Tana Djampea (island south of Sulawesi), Ambon, Sumba (Marine Ecoregions Arafura Sea, Banda Sea, Lesser Sunda), coral reefs and sand bottoms at 12–125 m depth.
Remarks
The specimens described here are judged to be conspecific with Gellius incrustans Hentschel, 1912 . However, data provided by Hentschel do not entirely match the present specimens: normal sigmas are described as very common, but no size categories were mentioned; only the largest size is quoted as 43– 56 μm, smaller than the present 57–81 μm. Flagellosigmas are quoted as having a largest ‘Durchmesser’ of 47–51 μm, likewise smaller than in the present specimens. Oxeas were 156–180 × 5–6 μm, according to Hentschel. It remains to be established whether the differences observed here are the result of a less than optimal description by Hentschel, or a genuine difference, in which case the present specimens belong to an undescribed species.
Apart from these differences, transferring Gellius incrustans to the combination Haliclona (Flagellia) incrustans , created a junior secondary homonym of Haliclona foraminosa incrustans ( Czerniavsky, 1880) (originally Protoschmidtia foraminosa forma incrustans ) and of Haliclona simulans incrustans ( Carter, 1887) ( Carter 1887: 70, originally Isodictya simulans var. incrustans ). Burton (1959b: 220) already solved the latter case of homonymy by giving Carter’s subspecies the new name Haliclona carteri Burton, 1959 . Here the new combination Haliclona (Flagellia) hentscheli nom. nov. is proposed to solve the homonymy with Czerniavsky’s (1880) species, which, in spite of its unrecognizable description remains a senior secondary homonym until such time as its status is resolved. Future reallocation of these species to other valid genera will require reinstatement of Hentschel’s and Carter’s names.
Burton’s (1928) deep-water record of Gellius flagellifer from the nearby Andaman Sea was possibly the present species, as the upper size of the normal sigmas falls within the variation of the above measurements. However, the oxeas of the Andaman specimens are 280–360 × 12–14 μm, well in excess of those measured above. Combined with the deepwater occurrence (300–900 m) the conspecificity appears doubtful.
ZMA |
Universiteit van Amsterdam, Zoologisch Museum |
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Haliclona (Flagellia) hentscheli
Van Soest, Rob W. M. 2017 |
Gellius incrustans
Hentschel E. 1912: 390 |