Graomys centralis (Thomas 1902)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7316535 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11325144 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6B7D3753-B469-6308-18A7-3D2E756C2DD8 |
treatment provided by |
Guido |
scientific name |
Graomys centralis (Thomas 1902) |
status |
|
Graomys centralis (Thomas 1902) View in CoL
[Graomys] centralis (Thomas 1902) View in CoL , Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, 9: 240.
Type Locality: Argentina, Córdoba Prov., Cruz del Eje, 600 m.
Vernacular Names: Central Pericote.
Distribution: C Argentina (La Rioja, Catamarca, and Córdoba Provs.); distributional limits uncertain.
Discussion: Described as a subspecies of griseoflavus and early recognized at that rank (Cabrera, 1961; Ellerman, 1941; Gyldenstolpe, 1932); later merged as a full synonym of Phyllotis g. griseoflavus by Hershkovitz (1962). Substantial divergence in allozymes, genomic content, and karyotypes, together with laboratory breeding results, collectively supports the specific status of populations referrable to centralis (Ramírez et al., 2001; Theiler and Blanco, 1996; Theiler and Gardenal, 1994; Theiler et al., 1999; Zambelli et al., 1994), as known from C Argentina. However, whether centralis will prove to be the oldest name to apply to the 2n = 42 karyomorph, versus 2n = 36-38 in G. griseoflavus , or whether other names should be added to its synonymy, will require broader analyses of populations of Graomys , especially those yet included within G. griseoflavus ; see Tiranti (1998 a) for a thoughtful overview of the geographic ranges of different karyomorphs and the nomenclatural issues to be illuminated in order to apply the proper specific epithets.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.