Gehundra sordida ( Baker, 1900 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2021.746.1323 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C82E9877-EAB4-41B1-A73A-0687C94D9472 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4716216 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03977924-1877-FFA5-A226-FBD4FE1D3822 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Gehundra sordida ( Baker, 1900 ) |
status |
|
Gehundra sordida ( Baker, 1900) View in CoL
Figs 32–49 View Figs 32–42 View Figs 43–49
Macropsis sordidus Baker, 1900: 56 View in CoL .
Bythoscopus sordidus View in CoL – Oman 1936: 354.
Stragania sordida View in CoL – Linnavuori 1956: 18.
Iassus sordidus View in CoL – Metcalf 1966: 90.
Gehundra sordida View in CoL – Blocker 1979: 23, fig. 24.
Diagnosis
Pygofer ( Figs 36–38 View Figs 32–42 ) ventral margin excavated basally, with rounded lobe at basal third, and short, thick setae grouped in line near midlength. Subgenital plate ( Figs 36–39 View Figs 32–42 ) with external margin with rounded lobe on basal half; apex of pseudostyle subacute, with thin setae along external margin and group of thicker setae on apex. Style ( Fig. 40 View Figs 32–42 ) with apophysis straight, apex rounded, curved dorsally.
Material examined
BRAZIL • 1♂;“Brasil,MS[Mato Grosso do Sul], Miranda, \ Cultura soja, 20°07’24,29”S \ 56°37’15,66”W, 122m,\ 02.II.2016, A. Specht, W. R. F. \de Camargo & H.V.B. Concone ”; DZUP 215454 View Materials GoogleMaps • 2 ♀♀; same collection data as for preceding; “ 03.II.2016 ”; DZUP 215455-215456 View Materials GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; “ Porteira , 20°06’01,22”S 56°37’06,35”W, 120m, 01.II.2016 ”; DZUP 215457 View Materials GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; “ Nativa-campo , 20°06’20,20”S 56°36’52,62”W, 121m, 14.XI.2015 ”; DZUP 215458 View Materials GoogleMaps .
Description (external characters as in the preceding description)
Male
MEASUREMENTS (mm). Total length (♂), 4.5; (♀) 4.5–4.8.
COLORATION. Head and thorax ( Figs 32–34 View Figs 32–42 ) brownish-yellow. Pronotum ( Fig. 32 View Figs 32–42 ) with irregular brown markings near anterior margin. Mesonotum ( Fig. 32 View Figs 32–42 ) with lateral angles dark brown. Forewing ( Figs 32– 33 View Figs 32–42 ) with brown setae and groups of black setae at midlength of anal margin, apex of clavus and apex of inner discal cell (variable in intensity between the specimens).
TERMINALIA. Sternite VIII ( Fig. 35 View Figs 32–42 ) convex, strongly produced posterad, 1.5 times longer than wide, longer than sternites VII and VI combined; ventral surface with many small setae, except basal portion and along median line; lateral margins with small rounded lobe at basal third; apex abruptly tapered and rounded. Valve ( Figs 36–37 View Figs 32–42 ) longer than wide, broadly fused laterally to pygofer; lateral margins convergent toward ventral margin, with strong integument thickening; ventral margin rounded. In lateral view, pygofer ( Figs 36–37 View Figs 32–42 ) without processes, higher near basal third; dorsal margin notched after half its length; dorsoposterior margin fused to pygofer lobes, straight and oblique; ventral margin excavated basally, with rounded lobe at basal third, straight on posterior ⅔, with short, thick setae grouped in line near midlength; lateral surface without macrosetae, but with few short setae near apex. In ventral view, pygofer ( Fig. 38 View Figs 32–42 ) with ventral margin folded inward, from base to apex, with short setae on inner surface. Anal tube membranous, without processes. Subgenital plate ( Figs 36–39 View Figs 32–42 ) short, with well developed pseudostyle; inner margin nearly straight; external margin with rounded lobe on basal half, overlapping pygofer laterally; apex of pseudostyle subacute, with thin setae along external margin and group of thicker setae on apex. Connective amorphous. Style ( Figs 36, 40 View Figs 32–42 ) long, approximately straight, apodeme and apophysis long, sub equal in length; apex rounded, curved dorsally. Aedeagus ( Figs 41–42 View Figs 32–42 ), with preatrium not developed; dorsal apodeme developed, lateral margins extended laterad and posterior margin extending to almost apex of shaft; shaft slightly curved dorsally, with height approximately constant from base to apex. In ventral view, aedeagus ( Fig. 42 View Figs 32–42 ) with shaft apex bifid; gonopore subapical.
Female
TERMINALIA. Sternite VII ( Figs 43–44 View Figs 43–49 ) ca two times wider than long; ventral surface with short setae; posterior margin with narrow and deep notch medially. Internal sternite VIII membranous. Pygofer ( Figs 43–44 View Figs 43–49 ) with many thin setae; ventral margin broadly rounded; apex obliquely truncated. Ovipositor slender, evenly curved dorsad, not surpassing pygofer apex. First valvifer ( Fig. 45 View Figs 43–49 ) triangular; anterior margins of both valvifers connected by sclerotized membrane. First valvula ( Fig. 45 View Figs 43–49 ) with dorsal and ventral margins, slightly convergent apically, ca 8 times longer than high at base; ventral interlocking device long, extending over basal ⅔; dorsal sculpturing area areolate starting before the midlength; apical portion ( Fig. 46 View Figs 43–49 ) with ventral sculpture present only near apex, continuous with the dorsal sculpture, apex gradually tapered and acute. Second valvifer ( Fig. 49 View Figs 43–49 ) ca three times higher than long. Second valvula ( Fig. 47 View Figs 43–49 ) ca 10 times longer than high; dorsal and ventral margins parallel; dorsal margin with three distinct subapical teeth widely spaced; apical portion ( Fig. 48 View Figs 43–49 ) dorsal margin with two rounded notches forming one rounded tooth between apex and first subapical tooth; ventral margin without denticles and with one subapical tooth. Gonoplac ( Fig. 49 View Figs 43–49 ) four times longer than high; dorsoapical margin long with half length of gonoplac; external surface without dentiform cuticular projections; ventral margin broadly rounded, with few spaced macrosetae near ventral margin; apex rounded.
Remarks
Gehundra sordida is similar to G. galbina and G. cristalinensis sp. nov. in lacking long setae on ventral margin of pygofer, and is similar to G. cristalinensis sp. nov. in having the apex of style not foot-shaped. However, G. sordida can be easily separated by the subgenital plate with external margin with lobe limited to the basal half of pseudostyle (external margin with lobe occupying more than half length of pseudostyle in G. avulsa and G. cristalinensis sp. nov., and occupying entire length of pseudostyle in G. tricosa and G. galbina .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Gehundra sordida ( Baker, 1900 )
Domahovski, Alexandre C. 2021 |
Gehundra sordida
Blocker H. D. 1979: 23 |
Iassus sordidus
Metcalf Z. P. 1966: 90 |
Stragania sordida
Linnavuori R. E. 1956: 18 |
Bythoscopus sordidus
Oman P. W. 1936: 354 |
Macropsis sordidus
Baker C. F. 1900: 56 |