Frankliniella Species
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1653/024.099.0319 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03938780-B203-2C56-FCF0-FE82F9C5FA0F |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Frankliniella Species |
status |
|
Key to Larvae II of Select Frankliniella Species of Florida Adapted from Nakahara & Vierbergen (1998).
No morphological differences were detected between the larvae II vouchers of F.bispinosa View in CoL and the larva II collected with F.tritici View in CoL adults.Therefore,larvae II that key to F.bispinosa View in CoL from areas of Florida where populations of F.tritici View in CoL are encountered should be reported as F.bispinosa View in CoL / tritici View in CoL .
1.— Pronotum with 6 pairs of setae ( Fig. 1A View Fig ); mesonotum with 5 pairs of setae ( Fig. 1A View Fig ..................................... (instar I)
1’.— Pronotum with 7 pairs of setae ( Fig. 2B View Fig ); mesonotum with 8 pairs of setae ( Fig. 2C................................... 2 View Fig (instar II)
2.— Dark band of abdominal tergite IX extends to and sometimes anterior to the campaniform sensilla ( Fig. 3G.............. F View in CoL View Fig . fusca Hind
2’.— Dark band extends anterior to the D1 setae by about the distance of the diameter of the D1 setal socket ( Fig. 3A–E................ 3 View Fig
3.— Posteromarginal teeth, abdominal tergite IX, between the D1 setae, longer than the basal width of the D1 setae ( Fig. 3A, B, D, E View Fig ..... 4
3’.— Posteromarginal teeth, abdominal tergite IX, between the D1 setae, equal to or less than the basal width of the D1 setae ( Fig. 3C, F, G View Fig ...................................................................................................................... 7
4.— Dorsal setae of abdominal tergites VIII broadly pointed or acute ( Fig 3B, C, E, G View Fig .............................................. 5
4’.— Dorsal setae of abdominal tergites VIII blunt ( Fig 3A, D, F View Fig ................................................................. 6
5.— Abdominal tergite VIII discal plaques with poorly developed or rounded microtrichia ( Fig. 3B View Fig ); D1 setae of tergite VIII usually less than 40 µm................................................................................ F. cephalica (D. L. Crawford) View in CoL
5’.— Abdominal tergite VIII discal plaques with well-developed or pointed microtrichia ( Fig. 3E View Fig ); D1 setae of tergite VIII usually greater than 40 µm....................................................................................... F. occidentalis (Pergande) View in CoL
6.— Abdominal tergite VIII discal plaques with broadly pointed to rounded microtrichia ( Fig. 3D View Fig ); D1 setae of tegite VIII 20–30 µm long..................................................................................................... F. kelliae Sakimura View in CoL
6’.— Tergite VIII discal plaques with fine narrowly pointed microtrichia ( Fig. 3A View Fig ); D1 setae of tergite VIII 30–40 µm long................................................................................................................ F. bispinosa (Morgan) View in CoL
7.— Abdominal posteromarginal teeth tergite IX minute, less than the basal width of the D1 setae ( Fig. 3F View Fig ); abdominal tergal setae blunt; antennal segment VII 20–25 µm long; anterior margin of dark band tergite IX ofen emarginate between the D1 setae............................................................................................................. F. schultzei (Trybom) View in CoL
7’.— Abdominal posteromarginal teeth tergite IX small, most equal to the basal width of the D1 setae, occasionally some teeth laterad of the D1 setae are longer ( Fig. 3C View Fig ); abdominal tergal setae broadly pointed; antennal segment VII 27–33 µm long; anterior margin of dark band tergite IX variously shaped.......................................................................... F. insularis (Franklin) View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |