Exechonella brasiliensis Canu & Bassler, 1928
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4305.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1192C3A0-5CCB-4A86-903C-A2B82906A5F9 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6017334 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CF0AB852-FFDB-E90F-FF03-FD0F9467E231 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Exechonella brasiliensis Canu & Bassler, 1928 |
status |
|
Exechonella brasiliensis Canu & Bassler, 1928 View in CoL
( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 , Table 14)
Exechonella brasiliensis: Canu & Bassler 1928a View in CoL , p. 72, pl. 3, fig. 5; Vieira et al. 2008, p. 24. Not Exechonella brasiliensis: Winston & Heimberg 1986 View in CoL , p. 15, figs 26–27; Winston 1986, p. 19; Tilbrook et al. 2001, p. 65, fig. 8g.
Material examined. Holotype: USNM 8547 About USNM , encrusting on rock. Atlantic Ocean, Brazil, Bay of Bahia, Norseman St. 320, 1876, coll. by Rathbun. Other material examined: USNM 8580 About USNM , encrusting on rock. Atlantic Ocean , Brazil, Bay of Bahia, Norseman St. 343, Plataforma , 1876, coll. by Rathbun ; USNM 8581 About USNM , encrusting on rock. Atlantic Ocean, Brazil, Bay of Bahia, Periperi, Norseman St. 335, 1876, coll. by Rathbun ; USMN 8582 . Atlantic Ocean, Brazil, Bay of Bahia, Norseman St. 326, 1876, coll. by Rathbun.
Description. Colonies encrusting, unilaminar, multiserial. Zooids pentagonal, hexagonal or oval, some with a narrow gymnocystal rim, separated by a narrow groove. Primary orifice pear-shaped or subcircular, longer than wide, poster (one-third) narrower and more angular than the anter (two-thirds) of a more rounded outline; anter wall underlain by an inner lamina the ends of which proximally form well-defined, usually ‘boot’-shaped (triangular) condyles with pointed or rounded tip, extending slightly beyond the edge of the step-like curved area below. Operculum light brown in dry non-cleaned material. A low, smooth, collar-like peristome, most prominent laterally, sometimes slightly flared, oval or with parallel lateral sides; peristome edge even or sometimes waved, its proximal edge low and flat or, incidentally, with low, central, blunt projection. Frontal shield convex, smooth, evenly covered with 12–33 round or oval, sometimes angular, well-separated foramina with very large lumen, each with a relatively narrow raised rim of smooth or wrinkled gymnocyst. Foraminal rims widen during ontogeny, but fusions between them are rare. Incidentally, a short spike is formed on the gymnocystal rim in some foramina. Rims of lateral foramina often fused with the marginal gymnocystal rim thus making the zooidal outline zigzaglike. Marginal pores are small, and often overshadowed by the wide rims of neighbouring frontal foramina. One or two lateral avicularia seen in many zooids, situated on the outer edge (often raised, reminiscent an ear) of lateralmost foramina; these foramina are comparable in size with the other foramina. Each avicularium is represented by a shallow depression with a central nipple-like elevation (thin-walled conical or cylindrical) with a central pore, pointing frontally or tilted. In non-cleaned specimens the nipple is covered with a thin cuticular mandible, oval in shape, frequently shrinking in dried material. Vertical zooidal walls wide, represented by multiporous mural septula with one row of communication pores. Kenozooids and ancestrula are unknown.
Remarks. Exechonella brasiliensis is characterized by its low, smooth, collar-like peristome and frontal shield evenly covered with very large, round or oval, well-separated foramina.
Originally described from the Atlantic coast of Brazil, Exechonella brasiliensis has since been mentioned from the Indian Ocean, Indonesia, Komodo Island ( Winston & Heimberg 1986; Winston 1986), the Pacific Ocean, Vanuatu Archipelago (Tilbrook et al. 2001) and Atlantic Ocean, Brazil, Bay of Bahia ( Almeida et al. 2015). While we consider the specimen from Vanuatu to be E. similis n. sp. (see below), specimens from Komodo and Bay of Bahia should be checked to establish the species identity.
Bay of Bahia, Atlantic Ocean
m±sd r n AzL 874±123.5 654–1121 28 AzW 607.6±98.2 467–836 29 OrL 217±28.3 154–275 31 OrW 210±25 185–266 32 FoN 19±4.7 12–33 32 FoD 108±13.6 85–138.5 51 OD 63±10.9 34.6–88.5 145 Comparison of published illustrations and recently collected material from Lizard Island (described below as E. similis n. sp.) with the material of Canu and Bassler (USNM) revealed several differences between specimens from different localities: (1) the primary orifice in E. brasiliensis is almost as long as wide, whilst on average it is wider than long in the specimens from Komodo, Vanuatu and Lizard Island; (2) while the poster is angular and narrower than the anter in most zooids of E. brasiliensis , it has the same width with a rounded outline in colonies from Komodo and Pacific; (3) the condyles are less prominent in the Indo–Pacific specimens; (4) in some zooids of E. brasiliensis the proximal border of the peristome bears a small blunt projection, but it is far more common and more prominent in the Indo–Pacific material; (5) whilst the range in foramina number is similar between the localities (12–33 in Brazil, 14–19 in Komodo, 16–23 in Vanuatu and 21–36 in Lizard Island), the average diameter of the lumen differs—almost 2.4 times larger in the holotype than in the specimen from Komodo (63 µm vs 26 µm), 1.6 times that of the specimen from Vanuatu (63 µm vs 39 µm) and 1.7 times of the specimens from Lizard Island; (5) the foramina with avicularia are normally larger than those without them in the Indo–Pacific material, and they are easily distinguished, but they are of a similar size in E. brasiliensis ; (6) in E. brasiliensis the kenozooids are not seen in the frontal view, whereas they are easily recognizable in the specimens from the Indo– Pacific; (7) finally, the marginal pores are obvious in the Indo–Pacific species, but in the Brazilian material they are frequently hidden by the rims of the nearest frontal foramina. These rims also often fused with the marginal gymnocystal rim of the zooid giving it the zigzag-like outline.
Distribution. Exechonella brasiliensis was originally described from the Bay of Bahia, Brazil, south-west Atlantic Ocean. It has not been found in the Brazilian waters since its original description (Dr L. Vieira, pers. comm. 2016).
USNM |
Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Exechonella brasiliensis Canu & Bassler, 1928
Cáceres-Chamizo, Julia P., Sanner, Joann, Tilbrook, Kevin J. & Ostrovsky, Andrew N. 2017 |
Exechonella brasiliensis
: Winston & Heimberg 1986 |
Exechonella brasiliensis
: Canu & Bassler 1928 |